Does shadow education discourage or encourage creative thinking? Evidence from South Korea (La educación en la sombra, ¿fomenta o desincentiva el pensamiento creativo? Evidencia de Corea del Sur)

References / Referencias

• Baker, D. P., Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Wiseman, A. W. (2001). Worldwide shadow education: Outside-school learning, institutional quality of schooling, and cross-national mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, D. P., & LeTendre, G. K. (2005). National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503624870
   Google Scholar
• Batey, M. (2012). The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.649181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355–429. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benckwitz, L., Guill, K., Roloff, J., Ömeroğulları, M., & Köller, O. (2022). Investigating the relationship between private tutoring, tutors’ use of an individual frame of reference, reasons for private tutoring, and students’ motivational-affective outcomes. Learning and Individual Differences, 95, 102137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, M. (2010). Researching shadow education: Methodological challenges and directions. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9056-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, M. (2014). The impact of shadow education on student academic achievement: Why the research is inconclusive and what can be done about it. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(3), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9326-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, M. (2023). Understanding private supplementary tutoring: Metaphors, diversities and agendas for shadow education research. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2023.2194792
   Google Scholar
• Byun, S. (2010). Does policy matter in shadow education spending? Revisiting the effects of the high school equalization policy in South Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, S. (2014). Shadow education and academic success in Republic of Korea. In H. Park, & K. Kim (Eds.), Korean education in changing economic and demographic contexts (pp. 39–58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-27-7_3
   Google Scholar
• Byun, S., & Baker, D. P. (2015). Shadow education. In R. Scott, S. Kosslyn, & N. Pinkerton (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (pp. 1–9). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0301
   Google Scholar
• Byun, S., & Chung, H. (2014). Cross-national differences in shadow education: Search for explanatory factors. [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Byun, S., Chung, H., & Baker, D. (2018). Global patterns of the use of shadow education: Student, family, and national influences. Research in the Sociology of Education, 20, 71–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-353920180000020004
   Google Scholar
• Byun, S., & Park, H. (2012). The academic success of East Asian American youth: The role of shadow education. Sociology of Education, 85(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040711417009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, S., & Pong, S. (2016). Children’s highbrow cultural activities and academic achievement in Hong Kong. Research in the Sociology of Education, 19, 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-353920150000019006
   Google Scholar
• Byun, S., Schofer, E., & Kim, K. (2012). Revisiting the role of cultural capital in East Asian educational systems: The case of South Korea. Sociology of Education, 85(3), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040712447180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, M. A. (2011, April 3). S. Korea tries to wrest control from booming private tutoring industry. The Washington Post. //www.washingtonpost.com/world/s-korea-tries-to-wrest-control-from-booming-private-tutoring-industry/2011/01/12/AFNXQfXC_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S., & Byun, S. (2022, June 30). Socioeconomic inequality in non-cognitive skills among young adolescents in Korea: Gaps, trends, and heterogeneity. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/gbm5j
   Google Scholar
• Chung, H., & Raymo, J. (2022, April 6-9). Parenting in a “universal concerted cultivation” society: Class and childrearing in South Korea [Paper presentation]. Population Association of America 2022, Atlanta, GA, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review, 23(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554069
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang, H. (2007). The determinants and impact of private tutoring classes in Vietnam. Economics of Education Review, 26(6), 684–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance (1st ed.). Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Entrich, S. R. (2018). Shadow education and social inequalities in Japan. Evolving patterns and conceptual implications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69119-0
   Google Scholar
• Entrich, S. R. (2021). Worldwide shadow education and social inequality: Explaining differences in the socioeconomic gap in access to shadow education across 63 societies. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 61(6), 441–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715220987861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, K., & Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1060–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. (2016). Linkographic evidence for concurrent divergent and convergent thinking in creative design. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guill, K., Lüdtke, O., & Köller, O. (2020). Assessing the instructional quality of private tutoring and its effects on student outcomes: Analyses from the German National educational panel study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guill, K., Ömeroğulları, M., & Köller, O. (2021). Intensity and content of private tutoring lessons during German secondary schooling: Effects on students’ grades and test achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37(4), 1093–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00581-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2015). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Chen, Q., Zhai, S., & Pei, C. (2020). Does private tutoring improve student learning in China? Evidence from the China education panel survey. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 7(3), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S., & Suh, H. (2020). The effects of shadow education on high school students’ creative thinking and academic achievement in mathematics: The case of the Republic of Korea. Educational Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1850427
   Google Scholar
• He, Y., Zhang, Y., Ma, X., & Wang. (2021). Does private supplementary tutoring matter? The effect of private supplementary tutoring on mathematics achievement. International Journal of Educational Development, 84, 102402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., & Rubinstein, Y. (2001). The importance of noncognitive skills: Lessons from the GED testing program. The American Economic Review, 91(2), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichino, J. (2011, September 24–28). Discriminating divergent/convergent phases of meeting using non-verbal speech patterns. In S. Bødker, N. O. Bouvin, W. Lutters, V. Wulf, & L. Ciolfi (Eds.), ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 153–172). Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R., & Young, R. (2011). Toward best practices in analyzing datasets with missing data: Comparisons and recommendations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(5), 926–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00861.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. C. (2016). Shadow education, curriculum, and culture of schooling in South Korea. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. C., Jo, J., & Jung, J. (2020). The education of academically gifted students in South Korea: Innovative approaches in shadow education. European Journal of Education, 55(3), 376–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. C., & Jung, J. H. (Eds.). (2021). Theorizing shadow education and academic success in East Asia: Understanding the meaning, value, and use of shadow education by East Asian students. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuan, P. (2011). Effects of cram schooling on mathematics performance: Evidence from junior high students in Taiwan. Comparative Education Review, 55(3), 342–368. https://doi.org/10.1086/659142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. (2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review, 67(5), 747–776. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Lee, H., & Jang, H. (2010). The history of policy responses to shadow education in South Korea: Implications for the next cycle of policy responses. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9064-6
   Google Scholar
• Matsuoka, R. (2019). Concerted cultivation developed in a standardized education system. Social Science Research, 77, 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). PISA 2021 creative thinking framework (3rd draft). //www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA-2021-creative-thinking-framework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Park, H., Buchmann, C., Choi, J., & Merry, J. J. (2016). Learning beyond the school walls: Trends and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 42(1), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Byun, S., & Kim, K. (2011). Parental involvement and students’ cognitive outcomes in Korea: Focusing on private tutoring. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040710392719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, W. (1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 13, 19–23. https://www.stata-press.com/journals/stbcontents/stb13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician, 39, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1985.10479383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royston, P., & White, I. R. (2011). Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE): Implementation in Stata. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316696
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1991). The evaluative, valuative and divergent thinking of children. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(4), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.1991.25.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Basadur, M. (1993). Assessing ideational and evaluative skills and creative styles and attitudes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2(3), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.1993.2.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaub, M., Kim, H., Jang, D., & Baker, D. P. (2020). Reformer’s dream or nightmare? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(7), 1066–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1733797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Martin, C., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W. H., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs. American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Seth, M. (2002). Education fever: Society, politics, and the pursuit of schooling in South Korea. University of Hawaii Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824862305
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Wadswordth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, E. (2008). The more, the better? Intensity of involvement in private tuition and examination performance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(5), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610802246395
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Korea. (2023). Private education expenditures survey of elementary, middle and high school students in 2022. Retrieved April 12, 2023, from //kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10301070100&bid=245&act=view&list_no=424071 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in culture of conformity. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Technical- norms manual. Scholastic Testing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent-Lancrin, S., González-Sancho, C., Bouckaert, M., Luca, F., Fernández-Barrerra, M., Jacotin, G., Urgel, J., & Vidal, Q. (2019). Fostering students’ creativity and critical thinking: What it means in school. Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/62212c37-en
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, P. T. (2005). How many imputations are needed? A comment on Hershberger and Fisher (2003). Structural Equation Modeling, 12(2), 334–335. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1202_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, P. T. (2007). Regression with missing Ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37(1), 83–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2007.00180.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, W., Shang, S., Jiang, W., Pei, M., & Su, Y. (2019). Convergent thinking moderates the relationship between divergent thinking and scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwier, D., Geven, S., & van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2021). Social inequality in shadow education: The role of high-stakes testing. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 61(6), 412–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715220984500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar