Publication Cover
International Journal of Social Psychology
Revista de Psicología Social
Volume 3, 1988 - Issue 2
1
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Tema De Discusión

La investigación-acción en la frontera del siglo XXI

Pages 213-227 | Published online: 29 Apr 2014

Referencias

  • Argyris, C. (1980). Inner Contradictions of rigorous Research. NY: Academic Press.
  • Bergson, H. (1981). Creative Evolution. NY: Mac Millan.
  • Beyer, J. M., y Trice, H. M. (1982). «The utilization process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings». Admini. Scien. Quarterly, 591–622.
  • Cassier, E. (1957). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, 3: The Phenomenology of Knowledge. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Connolly, T.; Conlon, E.J., y Deutsch, S. J. (1980). «Organizational effectiveness: A multiple constituency approach». Acad. Mana. R., 5:211–217.
  • Cook, T. D., y Shadish, W. R. (1986). «Program Evaluation: The Worldly Science. Ann. Rev. Psychol., 37: 193–232.
  • Cunninham, B. (1976). «Action Research: Towards a procedural model». Human relations, 29: 215–257.
  • Daft, R. L., y Steers, R. M. (1986). Organizations: A Micro/Macro Approach. Glenview, II.: Scott, Foresman & Co.
  • Elliot, J. (1973). «What is Action Research in Schools? J. Curriculun Studies, 10: 355–357.
  • Evan, W. M. (1976). «Organization Theory and Organizational Effectiveness: An Exploratory Analysis». Qrganization and Administrative Sciences, 7: 15–328.
  • Foster, M. (1972). «The Theory and practice of Action Research in work organizations». Human Relations, 25: 529–556.
  • French, W., y Bell, C. (1973). Organizational Development. Englewood Clifs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon.
  • House, E. R. (1980). Evaluating with Validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Keeley, M. (1984). «Impartiality and Participant-Interest Theories of Organizational Effectiviness». Admi. Scien. Quarterly, 29: 1–25.
  • Kemmis, S. (1981). «Research approaches and Methods: Action Research». En D. Anderson y C. Blakers (Eds.), Transitions from School: An exploration of research and policy. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
  • Ketterer, R.; Rice, R., y Politser, R. (1980). «The action research paradigm». In R. Price y Politser (eds.), Evalutation and Action in social environment. NY: Academic Press.
  • Lewin, K. (1946). «Action Reseacher and Minority Problems». J. of Social Issues, 2: 34–46.
  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. NY: Basic Books.
  • Peters, M., y Robinson, V. (1984). «The origins and Status of Action Research». J. Appli. Behav. Scien. 20, 2: 113–124.
  • Popper, K. (1959). The logic of Scientific Discovery. NY: Basic Books.
  • Price, J. (1972). «The Study of Organizational Effectiveness». The Sociological Quarterly, 13: 3–15.
  • Rapoport, R. N. (1970). «Three dilemmas of action research». Human Relations, 23: 499–513.
  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Rebolloso, E. (1987). La investigatión de Evaluation vista a través de los «EVALUATIONS STUDIES REVIEW ANNUAL», en prensa.
  • Scriven, M. S. (1980). The logic of evaluation. Inverness, CA: Edgepress.
  • Strasser, S.; Eveland, J. D., et al. (1981). «Conceptualizing the Goal and System models of organizational Effectiveness-Implications for Comparative Evaluation Research». J. of Management Studies, 18, 3: 321–340.
  • Sullivan, J.J. (1986). «Human Nature, Organizations, and Management Theory». Acad. Mana. R., 3: 534–549.
  • Susman, G. I., y Everet, R. D. (1978). «As Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research». Admin. Scien. Q., 23: 582–603.
  • Yuchtman, E., y Seashore, S. E. (1967). «A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness». Ame. Sociol. Rev., 32: 891–903.
  • Zammuto, R. F. (1982). Assessing organizational effectiveness. Alvany. NY: State University of New York Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.