Referencias

• Aguiñiga, C.; Sebastián, J., y Moreno, B. (1987). La androginia y el ajuste de pareja. Estudios de Psicología, 32, 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, J. (1989). The relationship between gender-role measmes: A review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 173–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, J. (1991). A methodological commentary on gender scheme research. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 185–188.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L.; Martyna, W., y Watson, C. (1976). Sex typing and Androgyny: Further Explorations of the Expressive Domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 1.016–1.023.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender Schema Theory: A Cognitive Account of Sex Typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1982). Gender schema theory and self-schema theory compared: A comment on Markus, Crane, Bernstein, and Siladi's «Self-schemas and gender». Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1.192–1.194.
   Google Scholar
• Berzins, J. I.; Welling, M. A., y Wetter, R. E. (1978). A new measure of psychological androgyny based on the Personality Research Form. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 126–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, J. H. (1973). Conceptions of sex-role: some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. American Psychologist, 28, 512–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-feminity: an exception to the famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cota, A. A., y Fekken, G. C. (1988). Dimensionality of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire: An empirical replication. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 3, 135–140.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz Loving, R.; Díaz Guerrero, R.; Helmreich, R. L., y Spencej, T. (1981). Comparación transcultural y análisis psicométrico de una medida de rasgos masculinos (instrumentales) y femeninos (expresivos). Revista de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Psicología Social, 1, 3–37.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkender, P. J. (1987). Validity of using Bem Sex Role Inventory norms on other samples: Analysis of a southern sample. Psychological Reports, 60, 399–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., y Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition. Nueva York: McGraw-Hil.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudreau, P. (1977). Factor analysis of the BSRI. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 229–302.
   Google Scholar
• Helmreich, R. L.; Spencej, T., y Holaman, C. K. (1979). Psychological Androgyny and Sex Role Flexibility: A Test of two Hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1.631–1.644.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helmreich, R. L.; Spencej, T., y Wilhelm, J. A. (1981). A psychometric analysis of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 7, 1.097–1.108.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, C. (1988). Roles and Gender in Relationships. En S. Duck (Ed.). Handbook of Personal Relationships. Chichester: Wiley y Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, J. (1964). Acquisition and significance of sex typing and sex-role identity. En M. Hoffman y L. W. Hoffman (Eds.). Review of child development research, vol. 1. Nueva York: Rusell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• King, L., y Emmons, R. (1990). Conflict Over Emotional Expression: psychological and physical correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 864–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahe, B. (1989). Sex-Role orientation and memory for gender-related terms: Another uncertain link. British journal of Social Psychology, 28, 327–340.
   Google Scholar
• Lenney, L. (1991). Sex Roles: the Measurement of Masculinity, Feminity, and Androgyny. En J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver y L. S. Wrightsman. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lippa, R. (1991). Some psychometric characteristics of gender diagnosticity measures: Reliability, Validity, Consistency across domains and relationship to the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 1.000–1.011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mackenzie-Mohr, D., y Zanna, M. (1990). Treating Women as Sexual Objects: Look to the (Gender Schematic) Male Who Has Viewed Pornography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(2), 296–308.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, H.; Crane, M.; Bernstein, S., y Siladi, M. (1982). Self-Schemas and Gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 38–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H.; Smith, J., y Moreland, K. L. (1985). Role of the self-concept in the perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1.492–1.512.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, H., y Wurf, E. (1987). The Dinamic self concept: a social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., y Myers, M. R. (1986). Masculinity, feminity and androgyny: A methodological and theoretical critique. Sex Roles, 14, 397–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W.; Antill, J. K., y Cunningham, J. D. (1987). Masculinity, Feminity and Androgyny: Relations to Self-Esteem and Social Desiderability. Journal of Personality, 55(4), 661–685.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., y Byrne, B. M. (1991). Differentiated additive androgyny model: Relations between masculinity, feminity and multiple dimensions of self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(5), 811–828.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin, P., y Bateson, P. (1991). La medición del comportamiento. Madrid. Alianza Universidad.
   Google Scholar
• Mcadams, P. (1988). Personal Needs and Personal Relationships. En S. Duck (Ed.). Handbook of Personal Relationships. Chichester: Wiley y Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mccreary, D. R. (1990). Multidimensionality and measurement of gender role attributes: A comment on Archer. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 265–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland, J. R.; Gulanick, N.; Montagne, E. R., y Harren, V. (1978). A some psychometric properties of the BSRI. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41, 735–745.
   Google Scholar
• Moya, M. C., y Pérez, C. (1990). Nuevas perspectivas en el Estudio de los Estereotipos de Género. En M.P. Valcárcel y J.L. meliá Comp.). Métodos y Técnicas de Intervención, vol. II. Actas del II Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social: Sociedad del Bienestar y Psicología Social. Barcelona: P.P.U.
   Google Scholar
• Páez, D.; Torres, B., y Echebarría, A. (1990). Esquema de sí, representación social y estereotipo sexual. En G. Musitu Comp.). Procesos Psicosociales Básicos, Vol. I. Actas del II Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social. Barcelona: P.P.U.
   Google Scholar
• Páez, D., y Vergara, A. (1992). Factores psicosociales en la construcción del conocimiento prototípico de las emociones. Revista de Psicología Social, 6(1), 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, T. J.; Connor, J. M., y Colletti, G. (1987). Gender-based schematic processing: An empirical investigation and reevaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 937–945.
   Google Scholar
• Pedhazur, E. J., y Tetembaum, T. J. (1979). Bem Sex Role Inventory: A Theoretical and Methodological Critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 996–1.016.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. P.; Shaver, P. R., y Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, L. O. (1984). Dimensionality of the BSRI: A multidimensional analysis. Sex Roles, 10, 99–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastián, J., y Agiñiga, C. (1988). La androginia psicológica: un acercamiento definicional. En J. Fernández Coord.). Nuevas perspectivas en el desarrollo del sexo y el género. Madrid. Pirámide.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastián, J. (1990). Las escalas de masculinidad y feminidad: presupuestos subyacentes al modelo clásico y actual. Segunda parte: El modelo Actual. Evaluación Psicológica, 6, 327–367.
   Google Scholar
• Siem, F. M., y Spence, J. T. (1986). Gender-related traits and helping behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 615–621.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, J. T.; Helmreich, R., y Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of Self and Peers on Sex-Role Attributes and Their Relation to Self-Esteem and Conceptions of Masculinity and Feminity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, J. T. (1983). Comment on Lubinsky, Tellegan and Butcher's masculinity, feminity and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 440–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srull, T. (1984). Methodological techniques for the study of person memory and social cognition. En R. Wier y T. Stull (Eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition, II. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara, A. (1993). Sexo e Identidad de Género: Diferencias en el Conocimiento Social de las Emociones y en el Modo de Compartirlas. Tesis Doctoral. Dpto. de Psicología Social y Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento de la Universidad del País Vasco.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, C. W.; Waters, L. K., y Pincus, I. (1977). Factor analysis of masculine and feminine sex typed items from the BSRI. Psychological Reports, 40, 567–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. E. (1983). Sex-Role orientation and Self-Esteem: A Critical Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(4), 765–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, F. R., y Cook, E. P. (1984). Concurrent validity of four androgyny instruments. Sex Roles, 11, 813–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zammichieli, M. E.; Gilroy, F. D., y Sherman, M. F. (1988). Relation between sex-role orientation and marital satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(4), 747–754.
   Google Scholar