Setting aside mood-biased thoughts and judgements: theory-based bias correction / Apartar las opiniones y los pensamientos sesgados por el estado de ánimo: la corrección del sesgo basada en teoría

References / Referencias

• Adaval, R. (2001). Sometimes it just feels right: The differential weighting of affect-consistent and affect-inconsistent product information. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 1–17. doi:10.1086/321944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Avnet, T., Pham, M. T., & Stephen, A. T. (2012). Consumers’ trust in feelings as information. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 720–735. doi:10.1086/664978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, L., & Troccoli, B. T. (1990). Feelings, direction of attention, and expressed evaluations of others. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 305–325. doi:10.1080/02699939008408080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Mental construal and the emergence of assimilation and contrast effects: The inclusion/exclusion model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 319–373). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Barden, J. (2007). Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 711–727. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Stavraki, M., Lamprinakos, G., Wagner, B., & Díaz, D. (2018). Affective and cognitive validation of thoughts: An appraisal perspective on anger, disgust, surprise, and awe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 693–718. doi:10.1037/pspa0000118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 69–83. doi:10.1086/314309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, E., & Sengupta, J. (2010). Insincere flattery actually works: A dual attitude perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 122–133. doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.1.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartrand, T. L., Dalton, A. N., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2007). Nonconscious relationship reactance: When significant others prime opposing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 719–726. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, Y.-W., & Hsiao, C.-C. (2015). Be yourself, image is nothing: Bias correction when viewing ads in sequence. Social Influence, 10, 19–30. doi:10.1080/15534510.2014.890667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, Y.-W., Hsiao, C.-C., Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (2019). Consumers’ correction for steady versus shifting mood bias: The moderating role of utilitarian versus hedonic focus. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, Y.-W., Wegener, D. T., Hsiao, C.-C., & Petty, R. E. (2010). Dimensional range overlap and context effects in consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 530–542. doi:10.1086/652415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien,Y.-W., Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Hsiao,C.-C. (2014). The flexible correction model: Bias correction guided by naïve theories of bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 275–286. doi:10.1111/spc3.12105
   Google Scholar
• Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 323–417). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. B., & Andrade, E. B. (2004). Affective intuition and task-contingent affect regulation. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 358–367. doi:10.1086/422114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dermer, M., Cohen, S. J., Jacobsen, E., & Anderson, E. A. (1979). Evaluative judgments of aspects of life as a function of vicarious exposure to hedonic extremes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 247–260. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Rucker, D. D., Wegener, D. T., & Braverman, J. (2004). Discrete emotions and persuasion: The role of emotion-induced expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 43–56. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, M., Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1999). Procedural and legal motivations to correct for perceived judicial biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 186–203. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (1994). The role of emotion in social judgments: An introductory review and an affect infusion model (AIM). European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 1–24. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Mood effects and person-perception judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, M. P. (1985). Mood states and consumer-behavior – A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 281–300. doi:10.1086/208516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, J., & Banaji, M. R. (1999). When fair is foul and foul is fair: Reverse priming in automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 669–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorn, G. J., Goldberg, M. E., & Basu, K. (1993). Mood, awareness, and product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2, 237–256. doi:10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80016-2
   Google Scholar
• Herr, P. M. (1989). Priming price: Prior knowledge and context effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 67–75. doi:10.1086/jcr.1989.16.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, P. M., Sherman, S. J., & Fazio, R. H. (1983). Consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323–340. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntsinger, J. R., Isbell, L. M., & Clore, G. L. (2014). The affective control of thought: Malleable, not fixed. Psychological Review, 121, 600–618. doi:10.1037/a0037669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isbell, L. M., Lair, E. C., & Rovenpor, D. R. (2013). Affect‐as‐information about processing styles: A cognitive malleability approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 93–114. doi:10.1111/spco.2013.7.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., Shalker, T. E., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978). Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: A cognitive loop. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L., Kaye, D., & Kirschner, P. (1965). Facilitating effects of eating while reading on responsiveness to persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 181–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, C. R., & Pratt-Hyatt, J. S. (2009). Distributing prejudice unequally: Do whites direct their prejudice toward strongly identified minorities? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 432–445. doi:10.1037/a0012877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Y. S., & Herr, P. M. (2006). Beauty and the beholder: Toward an integrative model of communication source effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 123–130. doi:10.1086/504143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laran, J., Dalton, A. N., & Andrade, E. B. (2011). The curious case of behavioral backlash: Why brands produce priming effects and slogans produce reverse priming effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 999–1014. doi:10.1086/656577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. (2004). The impact of bias awareness timing and the compatibility of naïve theory and experience on correction processes (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Maddux, W. W., Barden, J., Brewer, M. B., & Petty, R. E. (2005). Saying no to negativity: The effects of context and motivation to control prejudice on automatic evaluative responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 19–35. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L. (1986). Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L., Abend, T., Sedikides, C., & Green, J. D. (1997). How would it feel if …? Mood as input to a role fulfillment evaluation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 242–253. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L., Seta, J. J., & Crelia, R. A. (1990). Assimilation and contrast as a function of people’s willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27–37. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaslin, M., Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (2010). Self-enhancement and theory-based correction processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 830–835. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, C., White, K., & Newth, S. (2003). Mood acknowledgment and correction for the mood-congruency bias in social judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 483–491. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00025-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottati, V., & Isbell, L. M. (1996). Effects of mood during exposure to target information on subsequently reported judgments: An on-line model of misattribution and correction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 39–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (2007). The role of meta-cognition in social judgment. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 254–284). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2003). Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 752–772). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high- and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 5–20. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1993). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for context-induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 137–165. doi:10.1006/jesp.1993.1007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 41–72). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, M. T. (1998). Representativeness, relevance, and the use of feelings in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 144–159. doi:10.1086/jcr.1998.25.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razran, G. H. S. (1940). Conditioned response changes in rating and appraising sociopolitical slogans. Psychological Bulletin, 37, 481–493.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992). Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgment (pp. 217–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (2007). Mental construal processes: The inclusion/exclusion model. In D. A. Stapel & J. Suls (Eds.), Assimilation and contrast in social psychology (pp. 119–141). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., Strack, F., & Mai, H. P. (1991). Assimilation and contrast effects in part-whole question sequences: A conversational logic analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 3–23. doi:10.1086/269239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sczesny, S., & Kühnen, U. (2004). Meta-cognition about biological sex and gender-stereotypic physical appearance: Consequences for the assessment of leadership competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 13–21. doi:10.1177/0146167203258831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strack, F. (1992). The different routes to social judgments: Experiential versus informational strategies. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgment (pp. 249–276). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Strack, F., Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Kübler, A., & Wänke, M. (1993). Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 53–62. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir, M. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 199–222. doi:10.1177/1088868315586325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Contextual contrast and perceived knowledge: Exploring the implications for persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 17–30. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Clark, J. K., & Petty, R. E. (2006). Not all stereotyping is created equal: Differential consequences of thoughtful versus non-thoughtful stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 42–59. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Flexible correction process in social judgment: The role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141–208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (2001). On the use of naive theories of bias to remove or avoid bias: The flexible correction model. Advances in Consumer Research, 28, 378–383.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Klein, D. J. (1994). Effects of mood on high elaboration attitude change: The mediating role of likelihood judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 25–43. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 5–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, C. W. M., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2004). Affect, appraisal, and consumer judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 412–424. doi:10.1086/422119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanna, M. P., Kiesler, C. A., & Pilkonis, P. A. (1970). Positive and negative attitudinal affect established by classic conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 321–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R. (2013). Mood and processing of proattitudinal and counterattitudinal messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 482–495. doi:10.1177/0146167213478020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R., Schlett, C., & Aydinli, A. (2013). Mood and threat to attitudinal freedom: Delineating the role of mood congruency and hedonic contingency in counterattitudinal message processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1083–1096. doi:10.1177/0146167213490808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar