Rebound effects in persuasion: considering potential ironic effects of suppression and correction / Efectos rebote en la persuasión: una consideración de los posibles efectos irónicos de la supresión y la corrección

References / Referencias

• Abramowitz, J. S., Tolin, D. F., & Street, G. P. (2001). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression: A meta-analysis of controlled studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 683–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albarracín, D., Johnson, B., & Zanna, M. (2005). The handbook of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Fishman, D. J., Mrazek, M. D., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Unnoticed intrusions: Dissociations of meta-consciousness in thought suppression. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1003–1012. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkley, E. (2008). The role of self-control in resistance to persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 419–431. doi:10.1177/0146167207310458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1387–1397. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, Y.-W., & Hsiao, C.-C. (2015). Be yourself, image is nothing: Bias correction when viewing ads in sequence. Social Influence, 10, 19–30. doi:10.1080/15534510.2014.890667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, Y.-W., Wegener, D. T., Hsiao, C.-C., & Petty, R. E. (2010). Dimensional range overlap and context effects in consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 530–542. doi:10.1086/652415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, Y.-W., Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Hsiao, C.-C. (2014). The flexible correction model: Bias correction guided by näive theories of bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8/6, 275–286. doi:10.1111/spc3.12105
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Guadagno, R. E. (2004). Sequential request compliance tactics. In R. H. Gass & J. S. Steiter (Eds.), Perspectives on persuasion, compliance-gaining, and social influence (pp. 207–222). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2016). Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 68–80. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, J., & Liberman, N. (2004). A motivational model of post-suppressional rebound. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 1–32. doi:10.1080/10463280340000081
   Google Scholar
• Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Friedman, R. S. (2007). Seven principles of goal activation: A systematic approach to distinguishing goal priming from priming of non-goal constructs. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 211–233. doi:10.1177/1088868307303029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gailliot, M., Baumeister, R., DeWall, C., Maner, J., Plant, E., Tice, D., … Schmeichel, B. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 325–336. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D., & Hixon, J. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509–517. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano, R. J., & Wicha, N. Y. (2010). Why the white bear is still there: Electrophysiological evidence for ironic semantic activation during thought suppression. Brain Research, 1316, 62–74. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordijn, E., Hindriks, I., Koomen, W., Dijksterhuis, A., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Consequences of stereotype suppression and internal suppression motivation: A self-regulation approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 212–224. doi:10.1177/0146167203259935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johar, G. V., & Simmons, C. J. (2000). The use of concurrent disclosures to correct invalid inferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 307–322. doi:10.1086/jcr.2000.26.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Y., & Herr, P. (2006). Beauty and the beholder: Toward an integrative model of communication source effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 123–130. doi:10.1086/jcr.2006.33.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G., Milne, A., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808–817. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McShane, B. B., & Böckenholt, U. (2017). Single-paper meta-analysis: Benefits for study summary, theory testing, and replicability. Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 1048–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minear, M., & Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 630–633. doi:10.3758/BF03206543
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pashler, H., & Harris, C. R. (2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 531–536. doi:10.1177/1745691612463401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 323–390). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & White, P. (1998). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Implications for persuasion. Social Cognition, 16, 93–113. doi:10.1521/soco.1998.16.1.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, H., & Wyer, R. S. (2008). Procedural priming and consumer judgments: Effects on the impact of positively and negatively valenced information. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 727–737. doi:10.1086/523292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, P. P. (2012). Controlo de impactos indesejados em contexto persuasivo: Correcção, supressão e seus efeitos irónicos (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). ISPA, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Sleeth-Keppler, D., & Wheeler, S. C. (2011). A multi-dimensional association approach to sequential consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 14–23. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). Resisting influence: Judgmental correction and its goals. In J. P. Forgas & K. Williams (Eds.), Social influence: Direct and indirect processes. The Sydney symposium of social psychology (pp. 199–212). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tormala, Z. L., & Clarkson, J. J. (2007). Assimilation and contrast in persuasion: The effects of source credibility in multiple message situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 559–571. doi:10.1177/0146167206296955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tormala, Z. L., & Clarkson, J. J. (2008). Source trustworthiness and information processing in multiple message situations: A contextual analysis. Social Cognition, 26, 357–367. doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.3.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tottenham, N., Tanaka, J. W., Leon, A. C., McCarry, T., Nurse, M., Hare, T. A., & Nelson, C. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168, 242–249. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naïve theories in bias correction. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141–208). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., Smoak, N. D., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2004). Multiple routes to resisting attitude change. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 13–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Silva, P. P., Petty, R. E., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2012). The metacognition of bias regulation. In P. Briñol & K. DeMarree (Eds.), Social metacognition (pp. 81–99). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D., Carter, S., & White, L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzlaff, R., & Wegner, D. M. (2000). Thought suppression. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 59–91. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. C., Briñol, P., & Hermann, A. (2007). Resistance to persuasion as self-regulation: Ego-depletion and its effects on attitude change processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 150–156. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117–142. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer, N. (2007). Motivational influences on compliance with and consequences of instructions to suppress stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 417–424. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer, N., Sherman, J., & Stroessner, S. (2000). The roles of motivation and ability in controlling the consequences of stereotype suppression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 13–25. doi:10.1177/0146167200261002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yzerbyt, V., Corneille, O., Dumont, M., & Hahn, K. (2001). The dispositional inference strikes back: Situational focus and dispositional suppression in causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 365–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar