Publication Cover
International Journal of Social Psychology
Revista de Psicología Social
Volume 35, 2020 - Issue 2
469
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Numbing the perception of stigma: system justification decreases psychological distress by reducing perceived stigma among gay men and lesbians (Adormeciendo la percepción del estigma: la justificación del sistema disminuye el malestar psicológico mediante la reducción del estigma percibido entre gays y lesbianas)

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 282-309 | Received 06 Aug 2019, Accepted 22 Jan 2020, Published online: 24 Apr 2020

References / Referencias

  • Adimark. (2000). El nivel socio económico ESOMAR. Manual de Aplicación [The socio-economic status ESOMAR. Application manual]. Retrieved from http://www.microweb.cl/idm/documentos/ESOMAR.pdf
  • Almeida, J., Johnson, R. M., Corliss, H. L., Molnar, B. E., & Azrael, D. (2009). Emotional distress among LGBT youth: The influence of perceived discrimination based on sexual orientation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1001–1014. doi:10.1007/s10964-009-9397-9
  • APA. (2011). Guidelines for psychological practice with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. American Psychological Association, 67, 10–42. doi:10.1037/a0024659
  • Badaan, V., Jost, J. T., Osborne, D., Sibley, C. G., Ungaretti, J., Etchezahar, E., & Hennes, E. P. (2018). Social protest and its discontents: A system justification perspective. Contention, 6, 1–22. doi:10.3167/cont.2018.060102
  • Bahamondes, J., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2019a). ‘We look (and feel) better through system justifying lenses’: Evidence of the palliative function of ideology among the disadvantaged. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 1391–1408. doi:10.1177/0146167219829178
  • Bahamondes, J., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2019b). System justification and perceptions of group-based discrimination: Investigating the temporal order of the ideologically motivated minimization (or exaggeration) of discrimination across low- and high-status groups. Paper submitted for publication.
  • Bahamondes-Correa, J. (2016). System justification’s opposite effects on psychological well-being: Testing a moderated mediation model in a gay men and lesbian sample in chile. Journal of Homosexuality, 63, 1537–1555. doi:10.1080/00918369.2016.1223351
  • Barrientos, J. (2012). Homosexualidades y homofobia en América Latina: Balances y perspectivas. In C. Zúñiga (Ed.), Psicología, sociedad y equidad: Aportes y desafíos (pp. 151–176). Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
  • Barrientos, J. (2015). Violencia homofóbica en América Latina y Chile. Santiago: Ediciones el Desconcierto.
  • Barrientos, J., & Cárdenas, M. (2012). A confirmatory factor analysis of the spanish language version of the Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Scale (ATLG). Universitas Psychologica, 11, 579–586. doi:10.11144/Javeriana.upsy11-2.cfas
  • Barrientos, J., & Cárdenas, M. (2014). Construction and validation of a Subjective Scale of Stigma and Discrimination (SISD) for the gay men and transgender women population in Chile. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11, 187–198. doi:10.1007/s13178-014-0150-0
  • Barrientos, J., Cárdenas, M., & Saíz, J. L. (2016). Hate crimes in Chile. In E. Dumbar, A. Blanco, & D. Crèvecoeur-MacPhail (Eds.), The psychology of hate crimes as domestic terrorism: U.S. and global issues (Vol. 2, pp. 29–45). Los Angeles, CA: Praeger.
  • Blanz, M., Mummendey, A., Mielke, R., & Klink, A. (1998). Responding to negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 697–729.
  • Brandt, M. J. (2013). Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status-legitimacy hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 765–785. doi:10.1037/a0031751
  • Cárdenas, M., & Barrientos, J. (2008). The Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Scale (ATLG): Adaptation and testing the reliability and validity in Chile. The Journal of Sex Research, 45, 140–149. doi:10.1080/00224490801987424
  • Cárdenas, M., Barrientos, J., Gómez, F., & Frías-Navarro, D. (2012). Attitudes toward gay men and lesbians and their relationship with gender role beliefs in a sample of Chilean university students. International Journal of Sexual Health, 24, 226–236. doi:10.1080/19317611.2012.700687
  • Cochran, S. D., Sullivan, J. G., & Mays, V. M. (2003). Prevalence of mental disorders, psychological distress, and mental health services use among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in the United States. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 53–61. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.71.1.53
  • Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. The American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371–386. doi:10.1177/000276484027003008
  • De La Parra, G., Von Bergen, A., & Del Río, M. (2002). Primeros hallazgos de la aplicación de un instrumento que mide resultados psicoterapéuticos en una muestra de pacientes y de población general. Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatría, 40, 201–209. doi:10.4067/S0717-92272002000300003
  • Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2009). A psychological advantage for the status quo. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 85–106). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I., Kim, H. J., Barkan, S. E., Muraco, H., & Hoy-Ellis, C. P. (2013). Health disparities among lesbians, gay, and bisexual older adults: Results from a population-based study. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 1802–1809. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.301110
  • Garnets, L., Herek, G. M., & Levy, B. (1990). Violence and victimization of lesbians and gay men: Mental health consequences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 366–383. doi:10.1177/088626090005003010
  • Gómez, F., & Barrientos, J. (2012). Efectos del prejuicio sexual en la salud mental de gays y lesbianas en la ciudad de Antofagasta, Chile. Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad, 10, 100–123. doi:10.1590/S1984-64872012000400005
  • Hammond, M. D., & Sibley, C. G. (2011). Why are benevolent sexists happier? Sex Roles, 65, 332–343. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0017-2
  • Harding, J. F., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). The palliative function of system justification: Concurrent benefits versus longer-term costs to wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 113, 401–418. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0101-1
  • Hennes, E. P., Nam, H. H., Stern, C., & Jost, J. T. (2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30, 669–688. doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669
  • Herek, G. M. (2000). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19–22. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00051
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Janoff-Bulman, R. (1989). The benefits of illusions, the threat of disillusionment, and the limitations of inaccuracy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 158–175. doi:10.1521/jscp.1989.8.2.158
  • Jost, J., & Hunyady, O. (2003). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153. doi:10.1080/10463280240000046
  • Jost, J. T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 263–314. doi:10.1111/bjso.12297
  • Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi:10.1111/bjso.1994.33.issue-1
  • Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. doi:10.1111/pops.2004.25.issue-6
  • Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305. doi:10.1177/0146167200265003
  • Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36. doi:10.1002/ejsp.127
  • Jost, J. T., Wakslak, C. J., & Tyler, T. R. (2008). System justification theory and the alleviation of emotional distress: Palliative effects of ideology in an arbitrary social hierarchy and in society. Advances in Group Processes, 25, 181–211. doi:10.1016/s0882-6145(08)25012-5
  • Kaiser, C. R., Dyrenforth, P. S., & Hagiwara, N. (2006). Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system- and group-justifying motivations. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1523–1536. doi:10.1177/0146167206291475
  • Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
  • Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., Umphress, V., Hansen, N. B. V., Vermeersch, D. A., Clouse, G. C., & Yanchar, S. C. (1996). The reliability and validity of the outcome questionnaire. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 3, 249–258. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(199612)3:4<249::aid-cpp106>3.0.CO;2-S
  • Lerner, M. J. (1980). Belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Lingiardi, V., Nardelli, N., Ioverno, S., Falanga, S., Di Chiacchio, C., Tanzilli, A., & Baiocco, R. (2016). Homonegativity in Italy: Cultural issues, personality characteristics, and demographic correlates with negative attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13, 95–108. doi:10.1007/s13178-015-0197-6
  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
  • Major, B., Gramzow, R. H., McCoy, S. K., Levin, S., Schmader, T., & Sidanius, J. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82, 269–282. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.269
  • Major, B., & Kaiser, C. R. (2017). Ideology and the maintenance of group inequality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 582–592. doi:10.1177/1368430217712051
  • Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., O’Brien, L. T., & McCoy, S. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1068–1086. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1068
  • Major, B., & Sawyer, P. J. (2009). Attributions to discrimination: Antecedents and consequences. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 89–110). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341–351. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009
  • Meyer, I. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 38–56. doi:10.2307/2137286
  • Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2010). The joy of sexism? A multinational investigation of hostile and benevolent justifications for gender inequality and their relations to subjective well-being. Sex Roles, 62, 405–419. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9712-7
  • Nierman, A. J., Thompson, S. C., Bryan, A., & Mahaffey, A. L. (2007). Gender role beliefs and attitudes toward lesbians and gay men in Chile and the US. Sex Roles, 57, 61–67. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9197-1
  • Olson, J. M., & Hafer, C. L. (2001). Tolerance of personal deprivation. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 157–175). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Through rose-colored glasses: System-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 991–1004. doi:10.1177/0146167213487997
  • Pascoe, E. A., & Richman, L. S. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 531–554. doi:10.1037/a0016059.supp
  • Sengupta, N. K., Greaves, L. M., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2017). The sigh of the oppressed: The palliative effects of ideology are stronger for people living in highly unequal neighbourhoods. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 437–454. doi:10.1111/bjso.12192
  • Sengupta, N. K., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2015). The status-legitimacy hypothesis revisited: Ethnic-group differences in general and dimension-specific legitimacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 324–340. doi:10.1111/bjso.12080
  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and opression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sinclair, S., Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., & Colangelo, A. (2005). Social tuning of automatic racial attitudes: The role of affiliative motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 583–592. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.583
  • Stangor, C., & Crandall, C. S. (2000). Threat and the social construction of stigma. In T. Heatherton, R. Kleck, M. Helb, & J. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 62–87). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Suppes, A., Napier, J. L., & Van der Toorn, J. (2019). The palliative effects of system justification on the health and happiness of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 372–388. doi:10.1177/0146167218785156
  • Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., Moghaddam, F. M., & Lalonde, R. N. (1990). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy: Perceiving my group, but not myself, to be a target for discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 254–262. doi:10.1177/0146167290162006
  • UNDP. (2016). Human development report 2016: Human development for everyone. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf
  • Vargas-Salfate, S. (2017). The palliative function of hostile sexism among high and low-status chilean students. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1733. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01733
  • Vargas-Salfate, S., Paez, D., Khan, S. S., Liu, J. H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). System justification enhances well-being: A longitudinal analysis of the palliative function of system justification in 18 countries. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 567–590. doi:10.1111/bjso.12254
  • Vargas-Salfate, S., Paez, D., Liu, J. H., Pratto, F., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). A comparison of social dominance theory and system justification: The role of social status in 19 nations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1060–1076. doi:10.1177/0146167218757455

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.