References
- Bates, R. H. , Greif, A., Levi, M., Rosenthal, J.-L. and Weingast B. R. (1998). Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Baumgarther, F. R. and Leech, B. M. (1999). Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Beck, N. (2010). ‘Causal process observation: oxymoron or (fine) old wine’, Political Analysis, 18: 499–505. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpq023
- Bennett, A. and George, A. L. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Bevir, M. (2003). ‘A decentered theory of governance’ in H. Bang (ed.), Governance as Social and Political Communication. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 141–67.
- Brady, D. and Collier, D. (2010). Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
- Büthe, T. (2002). ‘Taking temporality seriously: modeling history and the use of narratives and evidence’, American Political Science Review, 96: 481–493. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402000278
- Collier, D. and Levitsky, S. (1997). ‘Democracy with adjectives: conceptual innovation in comparative research’, World Politics, 49: 430–451. doi: 10.1353/wp.1997.0009
- Geddes, B. (2003). Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Grindle, M. S. (2004). ‘Good enough governance: poverty reduction and reform in developing countries’, Governance, 17: 529–548. doi: 10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x
- Gutman, A. and Thompson, D. F. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Hedstrom, P. and Swedborg, R. (1999). Social Mechanisms: An Analytic Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hoppe, R. (2010). The Governance of Problems: Puzzling, Powering and Participation. Cambridge: Policy Press.
- Kaplan, A. (1960). The Conduct of Inquiry. San: Francisco: Chandler.
- Lasswell, H. D. (1936). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Levi-Faur, D. (2011). ‘From big government to big governance’ in D. Levi-Faur (ed.), Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–18.
- Lukes, S. (2004). Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
- March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions. New York: Free Press.
- Mayntz, R. (1999). ‘Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34: 227–259.
- Offe, C. (2008). ‘Governance: “empty signifier” [or social science research program]’ in G. F. Schuppert and M. Zürn (eds), Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 61–76.
- Peters, B. G. (2012). Institutional Theory in Political Life: The New Institutionalism, 3rd edn. London: Continuum.
- Pressman, J. L. and Wildavsky, A. (1974). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press).
- Ragin, C. (2005). Fuzzy Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). ‘The new governance: governing without government’, Political Studies, 44: 651–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
- Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview.
- Schmidt, V. A. (2010). ‘Taking ideas and discourses seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the Fourth New Institutionalism’, European Political Science Review, 2: 1–25. doi: 10.1017/S175577390999021X
- Sorensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2007). Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
- Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. and Sorenson, E. (2011). Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.