Professional learning of observers, collaborators, and contributors in a teacher-created online community in Korea

REFERENCES

• Author, et al. [details removed for peer review] (2011)
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J. A., Cunningham, D. J., & The ILF Design Team (2001). Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the Inquiry Learning Forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 71–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., & Scheckler, R. (2004). Designing system dualities: Characterizing an online professional development community. In S. A.Barab, R.Kling, & J. H.Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 53–90). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: Professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Trees.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one?Educational Researcher, 31, 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S., & Sommers, W. A. (2007). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: The Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hur, J. W., & Brush, T. A. (2009). Teacher participation in online communities: Why do teachers want to participate in self-generated online communities of K-12 teachers?Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 279–303.
   Google Scholar
• Hur, J. W., & Hara, N. (2007). Factors cultivating sustainable online communities for K-12 teacher professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36, 245–268.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. (2008). The development process of network-based community of practice for teachers' knowledge sharing and expertise development. The Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, K. W., Pratt, K., Anderson, M., & Stigter, J. (2006). Literature review and synthesis: Online communities of practice. New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1993). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B.Resnick, J. M.Levine, & S. D.Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–84). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A. (2007). Professional learning communities: A reflection. In L.Stoll & K. S.Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 199–203). England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A., & Mace, D. P. (2010). Making practice public: Teacher learning in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development. (2003). Adapting education to an information age. Seoul: Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development.
   Google Scholar
• Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2000). Lurker demographics: Counting the silentProceddings of CHI 2000. The Hague: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Nonnecke, N., & Preece, J. (2001). Why lurkers lurkAmerica Conference on Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Nonnecke, N., & Preece, J. (2003). Silent participants: Getting to know lurkers better. In D.Fisher & C.Lueg (Eds.), From usernet to co webs: Interacting with social information spaces (pp. 110–132). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, S., Ravid, G., & Soroka, V. (2004). De-lurking in virtual communities: A social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capitalPaper presented to the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., & Shumar, W. (2002). Community building with and for teachers at the Math Forum. In K. A.Renninger & W.Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities (pp. 60–95). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., & Shumar, W. (2004). The centrality of culture and community to participant learning at and with the Math Forum. In S. A.Barab, R.Kling, & J. H.Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 181–209). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, M. A., Fusco, J., & Schank, P. (2002). Evolution of an online education community of practice. In K. A.Renninger & W.Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities (pp. 129–158). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, M. A., & Schank, P. (1997). Tapped in: A new on-line community concept for the next generation of internet technology. In R.Hall, N.Myake, & N.Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 231–240). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, N., & Beach, B. (2004). From lurkers to posters. Retrieved May 15, 2012, from http://flexiblelearning.net.au/resources/lurkerstoposters.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, Choi, & Kim (2011). Sharing instructional materials online: A case study of online teacher community. The Journal of Elementary Education, 24(2), 257–284.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., & Louis, K. S. (2007). Professional learning communities: Elaborating new approaches. In L.Stoll & K. S.Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 1–13). England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identify. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. & Snyder, W. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2001). Supporting communities of practice: A survey of community-oriented technologies. Retrieved May 15, 2012, from http://www.ewenger.com/tech/executive_summary.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar