Educating science teachers in the twenty-first century: implications for pre-service teacher education

References

• Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competencies for new millennium learners in OECD countries ( OECD education working papers, No. 41). OECD publishing. Downloaded Jan 9, 2017. doi:10.1787/21852526115410.1787/19939019
   Google Scholar
• Aydeniz, M., Pabuccu, A., Cetin, P., & Kaya, E. (2012). Argumentation and students’ conceptual understanding of properties and behaviors of gases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1303–1324.10.1007/s10763-012-9336-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (1993). Reforming science education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cavagnetto, A. R. (2010). Argument to foster scientific literacy: A review of argument interventions in k-12 science contexts. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 336–371.10.3102/0034654310376953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin, P. S. (2013). Explicit argumentation instruction to facilitate conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Research in Science and Technological Education, 32, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin, P. S., Dogan, N., & Kutluca, A. Y. (2014). The quality of pre-service science teachers’ argumentation: Influence of content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 309–331.10.1007/s10972-014-9378-z
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C. P., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2003). The inquiry paradox: Why doing science doesn’t necessarily change ideas about science. Paper presented at the International Computer-Based Learning Science Conference, Nicosia, Cyprus, July 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, D., Taasoobshirazi, G., Hendricks, S., & Hickey, D. T. (2008). Argumentation: A strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identities. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 837–861.10.1080/09500690701411567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12.10.3102/0013189X023007005
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72.10.1080/03057260208560187
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., Ardac, D., & Guzel, B. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Case studies of pre-service secondary science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Eskin, H., & Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2013). Argumentation is a strategy for conceptual learning of dynamics. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1939–1956.10.1007/s11165-012-9339-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2006). An introduction of qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J. (2015). Educational implications of choosing “practice” to describe science in the Next Generation Science Standards. Science Education, 99(6), 1041–1048.10.1002/sce.2015.99.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. A. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 1–32.10.3102/0091732X030001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jime′nez-Aleixandre, M.-P., & Pereiro-Munoz, C. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1171–1190.10.1080/09500690210134857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, E. (2013). Argumentation practices in classroom: Pre-service teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1139–1158.10.1080/09500693.2013.770935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Anthony, R., & Blades, D. (2014). Decision making through dialogue: A case study of analyzing pre-service teachers’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 44, 903–926.10.1007/s11165-014-9407-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Hand, B. (2015). An analysis of argumentation discourse patterns in elementary teachers’ science classroom discussions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 221–236.10.1007/s10972-014-9416-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., & Tan, A.-L. (2011). Rethinking difficulties of teaching inquiry-based practical work: Stories from elementary pre-service teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 465–486.10.1080/09500691003639913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1318–1347.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on k-12 teachers. Science Education, 97, 936–972.10.1002/sce.2013.97.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2010). MOE to enhance learning of 21st century competencies and strengthen art, music and physical education. Retrieved January 18, 2017, from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/education-system/21st-century-competencies
   Google Scholar
• Nam, Y., & Chen, Y.-C. (2017). Promoting argumentative practice in socio-scientific issues through a science inquiry activity. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3431–3461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 553–576.10.1080/095006999290570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Next Generation Science Standards [NGSS]. (2013). The next generation science standards. Retrieved May 15, 2015, from http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/ngss/files/Final%20Release%20NGSS%20Front%20Matter%20-%206.17.13%20Update_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Retrieved April 22, 2016, from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/assessing-scientific-reading-and-mathematical-literacy_9789264026407-en#page24
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2007). OECD annual report 2007. Retrieved July 29, 2015, from http://www.oecd.org/newsroom/38528123.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science Education, 328, 463–466.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004a). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004b). IDEAS resource package. London: King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argumentation and explanation: A necessary distinction. Science Education, 95, 627–638.10.1002/sce.20438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdem, Y., Ertepinar, H., Cakiroglu, J., & Erduran, S. (2013). The nature of pre-service science teachers’ argumentation in inquiry-oriented laboratory context. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2559–2586.10.1080/09500693.2011.611835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2016). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved January 18, 2017, from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
   Google Scholar
• Roth, K. J., Druker, S. L., Garnier, H., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T., … Gallimore, R. (2006). Teaching science in five countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2006). Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(4), 323–346.10.1007/s10972-006-9025-4
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science Education, 90, 986–1004.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., & Blanchard, M. R. (2012). Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1122–1148.10.1002/tea.v49.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101–131.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Alternative paradigms of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., Crawford, B. A., Friedrichsen, P., & Land, S. (2002). Scaffolding pre-service science teachers’ evidenced-based arguments during an investigation of natural selection. Research in Science Teaching, 32, 437–463.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, J., Jocz, J. A., & Tan, A.-L. (2014). ‘Am I like a scientist?’: Primary children’s images of doing science in school. International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 553–576.10.1080/09500693.2013.791958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar