School culture, self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and teacher agency toward reform with curricular autonomy in South Korea: a social cognitive approach

References

• Ab Hamid, M.R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M.M. (2017, September). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 48(1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Awang, Z., Afthanorhan, A., & Asri, M.A.M. (2015). Parametric and non parametric approach in structural equation modeling (SEM): The application of bootstrapping. Modern Applied Science, 9(9), 58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology, 51(2), 269–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, P.A., & O’Sullivan, M. (2007). Enhancers and inhibitors of teacher change among secondary physical educators. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26(3), 221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brezicha, K., Bergmark, U., & Mitra, D.L. (2015). One size does not fit all: Differentiating leadership to support teachers in school reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(1), 96–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridwell-Mitchell, E.N., & Cooc, N. (2016). The ties that bind: How social capital is forged and forfeited in teacher communities. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink, A.G., Gouldman, A., & Victoravich, L.M. (2018). The effects of organizational risk appetite and social pressure on aggressive financial reporting behavior. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 30(2), 23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B.M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cerit, Y. (2013). Relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and their willingness to implement curriculum reform. International Journal of Educational Reform, 22(3), 252–270.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A. (2012). Teacher agency in educational reform: Lessons from social networks research. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 193–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devi, B., Khandelwal, B., & Das, M. (2017). Application of Bandura’s social cognitive theory in the technology enhanced, blended learning environment. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(1), 721–724.
   Google Scholar
• Donnell, L.A., & Gettinger, M. (2015). Elementary school teachers’ acceptability of school reform: Contribution of belief congruence, self-efficacy, and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font, X., Garay, L., & Jones, S. (2016). A social cognitive theory of sustainability empathy. Annals of Tourism Research, 58, 65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, A.A., Galligan, H.T., Albano, C.M., & O’Connor, K. (2009). Teacher subcultures of democratic practice amidst the oppression of educational reform. Journal of Educational Change, 10(4), 249–276.
   Google Scholar
• Geijsel, F.P., Sleegers, P.J., Stoel, R.D., & Krüger, M.L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 406–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruenert, S., & Whitaker, T. (2015). School culture rewired: How to define, assess, and transform it. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D.M. (2012). Varying teacher expectations and standards: Curriculum differentiation in the age of standards-based reform. Education and Urban Society, 44(2), 128–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, W., & Youngs, P. (2014). Why are teachers afraid of curricular autonomy? Contradictory effects of the new national curriculum in South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, M.H., Ju, T.L., Yen, C.H., & Chang, C.M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2), 153–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2011). Structural equation modeling in language testing and learning research: A review. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(3), 250–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2013). Structural equation modeling in educational research. In M.S. Khine (Ed.), Application of structural equation modeling in educational research and practice (pp. 23–51). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H.W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 567–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. (2003). Teaching and learning in Korean classrooms: The crisis and the new approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(2), 140–150.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunnari, I., & Ilomäki, L. (2016). Reframing teachers’ work for educational innovation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(2), 167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Park, D. (2014). Do American and Korean education systems converge? Tracking school reform policies and outcomes in Korea and the USA. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(3), 391–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (2009). A study on the curricular autonomy in the history of the general guideline of the national curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(2), 83–112.
   Google Scholar
• Macho, S., & Ledermann, T. (2011). Estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects in structural equation models: The phantom model approach. Psychological Methods, 16(1), 34–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D.P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• März, V., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Sense-making and structure in teachers’ reception of educational reform. A case study on statistics in the mathematics curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlister, A.L., Perry, C.L., & Parcel, G.S. (2015). How individuals, environments, and health behaviors interact: Social cognitive theory. In K. Glanz, B.K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 169–185). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H.T.M., & Bui, T. (2016). Teachers’ agency and the enactment of educational reform in Vietnam. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(1), 88–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ockey, G.J., & Choi, I. (2015). Structural equation modeling reporting practices for language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 12(3), 305–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormond, B.M. (2017). Curriculum decisions–The challenges of teacher autonomy over knowledge selection for history. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(5), 599–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk, I.H. (2012). Teacher’s role and autonomy in instructional planning: The case of secondary school history teachers with regard to the preparation and implementation of annual instructional plans. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 295–299.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. (2012). Teachers’ perception of curriculum autonomy plan and the status and demand of teachers’ autonomy in curriculum (Unpublished master thesis). Ewha Womans University, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, H.N. (2013). A novel approach to estimating and testing specific mediation effects in educational research: Explication and application of Macho and Ledermann’s (2011) phantom model approach. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 1(1), 39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Philippou, S., Kontovourki, S., & Theodorou, E. (2014). Can autonomy be imposed? Examining teacher (re) positioning during the ongoing curriculum change in Cyprus. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(5), 611–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, A. (2010). On having one’s chance: Autonomy as education’s limit. Educational Theory, 60(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Price, H.E. (2012). Principal–Teacher interactions: How affective relationships shape principal and teacher attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 39–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravindran, L. (2018). The effects of school culture impacting on the process of change. In S.F. Tang & S.E. Cheah (Eds.), Redesigning learning for greater social impact (pp. 141–147). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, M., Perkins, H., & Bodey, K. (2016). Academic motivation and information literacy self-efficacy: The importance of a simple desire to know. Library & Information Science Research, 38(1), 2–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, L.D., Ridgley, L.M., Callan, G.L., Karami, S., & Ehlinger, J. (2018). How teachers perceive factors that influence creativity development: Applying a social cognitive theory perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 100–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, D.Y. (2014). The structural relationship among elementary school teacher’s communication competence, school organization culture, teacher efficacy, and subjective happiness (Unpublished master thesis). Soongsil University, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Scharp, K.M., & Dorrance Hall, E. (2019). Examining the relationship between undergraduate student parent social support-seeking factors, stress, and somatic symptoms: A two-model comparison of direct and indirect effects. Health Communication, 34(1), 54–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, E.H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Seashore Louis, K., & Lee, M. (2016). Teachers’ capacity for organizational learning: The effects of school culture and context. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(4), 534–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, K.H. (2009). American teachers’ autonomy in curriculum and its implications for Korean education. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(3), 191–212.
   Google Scholar
• So, K., & Kang, J. (2014). Curriculum reform in Korea: Issues and challenges for twenty-first century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(4), 795–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somekh, B. (2008). Factors affecting teachers’ pedagogical adoption of ICT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 449–460). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weems, G.H., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2001). The impact of midpoint responses and reverse coding on survey data. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(3), 166–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatley, K.F. (2005). The case for reconceptualizing teacher efficacy research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(7), 747–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, K.C., & Lawson, H.A. (2018). Teachers’ agency, efficacy, engagement, and emotional resilience during policy innovation implementation. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2): 181–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, G.B. (2004). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., & Liu, Y. (2014). A study of secondary school English teachers’ beliefs in the context of curriculum reform in China. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 187–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar