Applying blended synchronous teaching and learning for flexible learning in higher education: an action research study at a university in Hong Kong

References

• Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). Cultural impacts on e-learning systems’ success. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 58–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avison, D., Baskerville, R., & Myers, M. (2001). Controlling action research projects. Information Technology & People, 14(1), 28–45.
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, R., Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2018). The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning. Computers & Education, 120, 197–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G.E., Lee, M.J., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butz, N.T., Stupnisky, R.H., Peterson, E.S., & Majerus, M.M. (2014). Motivation in synchronous hybrid graduate business programs: A self-determination approach to contrasting online and on-campus students. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 10(2), 211–227. Retrieved from https://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no2/butz_0614.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P.S.D., Lambert, A.D., & Guidry, K.R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S.K., & Mok, S.S. (2016). Changing organizational structure and culture to enhance teaching and learning: Cases in a University in Hong Kong. In Organizing academic work in higher education: Teaching, learning and identities (pp. 186–202). Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge, 2016
   Google Scholar
• Cidral, W.A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers & Education, 122, 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Edition). Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, U. (2014). Teaching the disembodied: Othering and activity systems in a blended synchronous learning situation. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A 10-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotterweich, D.P., & Rochelle, C.F. (2012). Online, instructional television and traditional delivery: Student characteristics and success factors in business statistics. American Journal of Business Education, 5(2), 129.
   Google Scholar
• Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2014). A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: The impact of motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 30–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, C.R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J.B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, M., Hung, I.C., Chen, N.S., & Kinshuk. (2010). A blended synchronous learning model for educational international collaboration. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 9–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbert, M.C. (2014). What makes an online instructional video compelling? Online Educause Review. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/4/what-makes-an-online-instructional-video-compelling
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P. (2014). Online educational delivery models: A descriptive view. Educause Review, 47(6), 84–86. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/11/online-educational-delivery-models–a-descriptive-view
   Google Scholar
• James, R., Krause, K.L., & Jennings, C. (2010). The first-year experience in Australian universities. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/134870
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, T.C., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.Y., & Chen, N.S. (2012). Effects of applying STR for group learning activities on learning performance in a synchronous cyber classroom. Computers & Education, 58(1), 600–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, C.P., & Wang, L. (2016). Blended learning for quality higher education: Selected case studies on implementation from Asia-Pacific. Paris, France: UNESCO Bangkok Office.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre‐Mills, J., Goff, S., & Hillier, D. (2011). Systemic action research: A strategy for whole system change. Journal of Educational Action Research, 10, 245–251.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, W.A., Perini, E., Rohlf, V., Toukhsati, S., Conduit, R., & Sanson, G. (2013). A blended learning lecture delivery model for large and diverse undergraduate cohorts. Computers & Education, 64, 116–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owston, R. (2013). Blended learning policy and implementation: Introduction to the special issue. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, W.W., Graham, C.R., Bodily, R.G., & Sandberg, D.S. (2016). A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseth, C., Akcaoglu, M., & Zellner, A. (2013). Blending synchronous face-to-face and computer-supported cooperative learning in a hybrid doctoral seminar. TechTrends, 57(3), 54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (Eds.). (2012). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra, L.M.B., Gutiérrez, R.S., & Garzón-Castro, C.L. (2012). Second Life as a support element for learning electronic related subjects: A real case. Computers & Education, 58(1), 291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, A.R., Harlow, D.B., & DeBacco, K. (2011). Students’ experience of synchronous learning in distributed environments. Distance Education, 32(3), 357–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer, E.T. (2008). Action research in education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Susman, G.I. (1983). Action research: A sociotechnical systems perspective. Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research, 95, 113.
   Google Scholar
• Szeto, E. (2014). A comparison of Online/Face-to-face students’ and instructor’s experiences: Examining blended synchronous learning effects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4250–4254.
   Google Scholar
• Szeto, E. (2015). Community of Inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching? Computers & Education, 81, 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 11, 1–15. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82–83. Retrieved from http://www.msuedtechsandbox.com/MAETELy2-2015/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/the_flipped_classroom_article_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W.T., & Wang, C.C. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 761–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. (2008). Blended learning: The convergence of online and face-to-face education. Promising practices in online learning. North American Council for Online Learning, 18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008
   Google Scholar
• White, C.P., Ramirez, R., Smith, J.G., & Plonowski, L. (2010). Simultaneous delivery of a face-to-face course to on-campus and remote off-campus students. TechTrends, 54(4), 34–40. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.eproxy.lib.hku.hk/docview/744367017?accountid=14548
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.D. (2018). Student learning in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zacharis, N.Z. (2015). A multivariate approach to predicting student outcomes in web-enabled blended learning courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zainuddin, Z., Haruna, H., Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Chu, S.K.W. (2019). A systematic review of flipped classroom empirical evidence from different fields: What are the gaps and future trends? On the Horizon, 27, 72–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., & Breslow, L. (2013). Literature review on hybrid/blended learning. Teaching and Learning Laboratory, 1–22. Retrieved from http://tll-dev.mit.edu/sites/default/files/library/Blended_Learning_Lit_Reveiw.pdf
   Google Scholar