Run by others: school autonomy in Shanghai’s entrustment management reform

References

• Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2016). Using collaborative inquiry to foster equity within school systems: Opportunities and barriers. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(1), 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M., & West, M. (2006). Improving urban schools: Leadership and collaboration. Buckingham: OU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (2005). Accountability in education. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, P., & Ainscow, M. (2018). School-to-school support within a competitive education system: Views from the inside. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(4), 614–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brindley, E. (2011). Moral autonomy and individual sources of authority in the Analects. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 38(2), 257–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, T., & Qian, H. (2000). Leadership and culture in Chinese education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 20(2), 58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. (2002). Moral autonomy, civil liberties, and Confucianism. Philosophy East and West, 52(3), 281–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. (2015). From one school to many: Reflections on the impact and nature of school federations and chains in England. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 43(1), 46–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., & Muijs, D. (2014). Does school-to-school collaboration promote school improvement? A study of the impact of school federations on student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(3), 351–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2014). Zouxiang youzhijunheng de bentuchuangxin – Shanghaishi xuexiao weituoguanli jiqi pinggu yanjiu [Indigenous innovation towards quality equity – The study of school entrustment management and its evaluation]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2000). Developing comparative and international educational leadership and management: A cross-cultural model. School Leadership and Management, 20(2), 143–160.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, X. (2012). Policy metamorphosis in China: A case study of minban education in Shanghai. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glatter, R. (2012). Persistent preoccupations: The rise and rise of school autonomy and accountability in England. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 40(5), 559–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D., & Ames, R. (1987). Thinking through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead, M. (1994). Accountability and values. In D. Scott (Ed.), Debating governance (pp. 146–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J. (2006). Walking on three legs: Centralization, decentralization, and recentralization in Chinese education. In C. Bjork (Ed.), Educational decentralization: Asian experiences and conceptual contributions (pp. 27–42). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, X. (2010). Gonglixuexiao weituoguanli gaige wenti yu zouxiang. [The issues and tendency of entrustment management reform in public schools]. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 11, 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, G. (2009). Weituoguanli yu zexiaowenti de xiaojie – Yi Shanghaishi Jinshan District L zhongxue weili. [Entrustment management reform and the dispel of select school – Take L middle school in Shanghai’s Jinshan District as example]. Journal of Schooling Studies, 6(10), 34–36.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, G. (2000). Decentralized centralism: Framework for a better understanding of governance in the field of education. Journal of Educational Policy, 15(50), 525–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. (2016). School autonomy as ‘the way of the future’: Issue of equity, public purpose and moral leadership. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 44(5), 713–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, W. (2009). Culture and school leadership in China: Exploring school leaders’ views of relationship- and rule-based governance. In A. Wiseman (Ed.), Educational leadership: Global contexts and international comparisons (International perspectives on education and society, Vol. 11) (pp. 303–342). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2010). Xuexiao weituoguanli de shishicelue yu fazhansikao. [Implementation strategies and development thought about school entrustment management]. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 11, 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, S. (1949/2011). Zhongguo wenhua yaoyi. [The essence of Chinese culture]. Shanghai: Shanghai Century Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lindley, R. (1986). Autonomy. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. (2014). Qiangneikaihua qiangwaixiang: Weituoguanli yu chenggongjiaoyu [Blossoming inside and sweet outside: Entrusted management and ‘success education’]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, T. (1988). Confucian thought and the modern Chinese quest for moral autonomy. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 1(1), 297–358.
   Google Scholar
• MOE. (2004). The action plan for education renovation (2003–2007). Beijing: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• MOE. (2010). The outline of China’s national plan for medium- and long-term education reform and development (2010–2020). Beijing: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). School governance, assessments and accountability. In PISA 2012 results: What makes schools successful (Volume IV): Resources, policies and practices (pp 127–164). Paris. doi: 10.1787/9789264201156-8-en
   Google Scholar
• Pan, G. (2014). Qianlun nongcun boruoxuexiao weituoguanli de chenggongjingyan – Yi Shanghaishi Fengxianqu weili. [Discussion about the successful experience of entrustment management reform: A case study of Fengxian District]. Shanghai Research on Education, 5, 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Pepper, S. (1996). Radicalism and education reform in 20th-century China: The search for an ideal development model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, H., & Walker, A. (2014). Principalship in China: Emerging propositions. Leading & Managing, 20(2), 60–74.
   Google Scholar
• Rosemont, H. (1988). Review of B. I. Schwartz’s the world of thought in ancient China. Journal of Asian Studies, 47, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salokangas, M., & Chapman, C. (2014). Exploring governance in two chains of academy schools: A comparative case study. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 42(3), 372–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayama, K. (2016). Deploying the post-colonial predicaments of researching on/with ‘Asia’ in education: A standpoint from a rich peripheral country. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(1), 70–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., Peters, G., Bouckaert, G., & Verschuere, B. (2004). The study of organizational autonomy: A conceptual review. Public Administration Development, 24(2), 101–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, A. (2003). Developing cross-cultural perspectives on education and community. In P. Begley & O. Johansson (Eds.), The ethical dimensions of school leadership (pp. 145–160). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, P. (1993). Centralized decentralization: Sloanism, marketing quality and higher education. Australian Universities Review, 36(2), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. (2010). School-to-school cooperation as a strategy for improving student outcomes in challenging contexts. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1), 93–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstanley, D., Sorabji, D., & Dawson, S. (1995). When the pieces don’t fit: A stakeholder power matrix to analyze public sector restructuring. Public Money and Management, 15(2), 19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X. (2013). Yi ‘duoyangyouzhi junheng’ huiying ‘gaoduanxuqiu’. [Responding to the ‘high-end education needs’ through promoting ‘diverse high-Quality balanced’]. Journal of Schooling Studies, 10(2), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• You, Y. (2017). Comparing school accountability in England and its East Asian sources of ‘borrowing’. Comparative Education, 53(2), 224–244.
   Google Scholar
• You, Y. & Morris, P. (2016). Imagining school autonomy in high-performing education systems: East Asia as a source of policy referencing in England. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(6), 882–905.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, G. (2016). Civilizational dialogue and a new understanding of the human person: Implications for Chinese education as person-making. In G. Zhao & Z. Deng (Eds.), Re-envisioning Chinese education: The meaning of person-making in a new age (pp. 165–181). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, L. (2007). Zhongguo difangguanyuan de jinsheng jinbiaosai moshi yanjiu. [Governing China’s local officials: An analysis of the promotion tournament model.]. Economic Research, 7, 36–50.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., & Lian, H. (2012). Zhongguo zhengfu de zhilimoshi: Yige ‘kongzhiquan’ lilun. [Modes of governance in the Chinese bureaucracy: A ‘control rights’ theory]. Sociological Studies, 5, 69–93.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., Lian, H., Ortolano, L., & Ye, Y. (2013). A behavioral model of “muddling through” in the Chinese Bureaucracy: The case of environmental protection. The China Journal, 70, 120–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, L. (2013). Qiujie quyujiaoyu junhengfazhan – Shanghaishi jichujiaoyu weituoguanli moshi tanxi. [Solving the balanced development of regional education – Exploring the model of entrustment management]. Journal of Schooling Studies, 10(2), 11–16.
   Google Scholar