Structural relationships among self-regulation, transactional distance, and learning engagement in a large university class using flipped learning

References

• Astin, A.W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J. (2017). Solving the homework problem by flipping the learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Best, B., & Conceição, S.C.O. (2017). Transactional distance dialogic interactions and student satisfaction in a multi-institutional blended learning environment. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 20(1), 138–152. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2017/Best_Conceicao.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P., Russell, A., & Brown, P. (2009). Teaching in large and small classes. International Handbook of Research on Teachers and Teaching, 21, 779–790.
   Google Scholar
• Bolliger, D.U., & Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 39(3), 299–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botha, L., Fourie, N., & Geyser, H. (2005). Teaching, learning and assessment in large classes – A reality of educational change. Education as Change, 9(1), 60–79.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, E. (1999). Students behaving badly in large classes. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 1999(77), 35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M.R. (2018). Effect of professional satisfaction on learning engagement in undergraduates majoring in preschool education: Mediating role of professional commitment. Psychology, 9(8), 2250–2260.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P.Y., & Hwang, G.J. (2019). An IRS-facilitated collective issue-quest approach to enhancing students’ learning achievement, self-regulation, and collective efficacy in flipped classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1996–2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education: University connections. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, M.P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R.G., Brewer, D.J., Gamoran, A., & Willms, J.D. (2001). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(1), 1–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekwunife-Orakwue, K.C., & Teng, T.L. (2014). The impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student learning outcomes in online and blended environments. Computers & Education, 78, 414–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flip Learning. (2014, March 12). Definition of flipped learning. Flip Learning. Retrieved from https://flippedlearning.org/definition-of-flipped-learning/
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). School engagement. In K.A. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.), Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development: What do children need to flourish (pp. 305–321). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullwood, E.D. (2015). Influence of the use of online communications media on perceptions of transactional distance and student satisfaction in a hybrid education program. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Oklahoma State University.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, K. (2012, June/July). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 13–17. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ982840.pdf
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step a simple guide and reference 17.0 Update (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Gilboy, M.B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giossos, Y., Koutsouba, M., Lionarakis, A., & Skavantzos, K. (2009). Reconsidering Moore’s transactional distance theory. European Journal of Open Distance and Elearning, 2009(2), 1–6. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?article=374
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, B., & Miller, K. (2013). Research says/evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in. Technology-Rich Learning, 70(6), 78–80. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar13/vol70/num06/Evidence-on-Flipped-Classrooms-Is-Still-Coming-In.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, G.J., Yin, C., & Chu, H.C. (2019). The era of flipped learning: Promoting active learning and higher order thinking with innovative flipped learning strategies and supporting systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 991–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishton, J.M., & Widaman, K.F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 757–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkelenberg, E.C., Dillon, M., & Christy, S.M. (2008). The effects of class size on student grades at a public university. Economics of Education Review, 27(2), 221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G.D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, C.L., & Hwang, G.J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics courses. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 517–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H.C., Hwang, G.J., & Hsu, Y.D. (2019). Effects of ASQ-based flipped learning on nurse practitioner learners’ nursing skills, learning achievement and learning perceptions. Computers & Education, 139, 207–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K.F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, K.R., Swart, W.W., & Paul, R.C. (2019). Continual improvement of online and blended teaching using relative proximity theory. Journal of Innovative Education, 17(1), 53–75.
   Google Scholar
• Mbwesa, J.K. (2014). Transactional distance as a predictor of perceived learner satisfaction in distance learning courses: A case study of bachelor of education arts program, University of Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 176–188.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, S., Schultz, J., Sellke, K., & Spartz, J. (2015). An examination of the flipped classroom approach on college student academic involvement. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(1), 42–55.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. (2011). Measuring deep, reflective comprehension and learning strategies: Challenges and successes. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems review. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, R., Brooks, E., & Mason, M. (2018, September 9). How U.S. News calculated the 2019 best college rankings. U.S. News. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/articles/how-us-news-calculated-the-rankings
   Google Scholar
• Mulryan- Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: Challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Survey of Student Engagement. (2017). Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education – Annual results 2017. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, E.M.W. (2018). Integrating self-regulation principles with flipped classroom pedagogy for first year university students. Computers & Education, 126, 65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D.J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, R.C., Swart, W.S., Zhang, A., M., & MacLeod, K.R. (2015). Revisiting Zhang’s scale of transactional distance: Refinement and validation using structural equation modelling. Distance Education, 36(3), 364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P.R., & de Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self–regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiner, L.A., & Louis, M. (2006, November). Measuring engaged learning in college students: Beyond the borders of NSSE. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the association for the study of higher education, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiner, L.A., & Louis, M.C. (2011). The engaged learning index: Implications for faculty development. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 22(1), 5–28. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ 926854).
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721–1731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Li, C., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175–190.
   Google Scholar
• Sletten, S.R. (2017). Investigating flipped learning: Student self-regulated learning, perceptions, and achievement in an introductory biology course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(3), 347–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., Jong, M.S.Y., Chang, M., & Chen, W. (2017). Guest editorial: “How” to design, implement and evaluate the flipped classroom? – A synthesis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 180–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soo, K.S., & Bonk, C.J. (1998, June). Interaction: What does it mean in online distance education. Paper presented at Ed-Media & Ed-Telecom 98, Freiberg, Germany. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED 428724).
   Google Scholar
• Steen-Utheim, A.T., & Foldnes, N. (2018). A qualitative investigation of student engagement in a flipped classroom. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(3), 307–324. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No EJ 1171433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82–83.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L.R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandler, J., & Imbriale, W. (2017). Promoting undergraduate student self-regulation in online learning environments. Online Learning, 21(2), doi:10.24059/olj.v21i2.881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., Willett, J.B., & Eccles, J.S. (2010). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49(4), 465–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, R.R., & Qi, J. (2005). Classroom organization and participation: College students’ perceptions. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 570–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C., Pintrich, P., & Karabenick, S. (2005). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In K. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish?: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 251–270)). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Woo, Y., & Reeves, T.C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15–25. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No EJ 796881.
   Google Scholar
• Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S.H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B.J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learner: Beyondachievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D.H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar