708
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Practicing tiered and heterogeneous grouping tasks in differentiated EFL classrooms at a military institution in Taiwan

ORCID Icon &
Pages 405-423 | Received 05 Mar 2017, Accepted 22 Nov 2020, Published online: 17 Dec 2020

References

  • Abrami, P. C., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., De Simoe, C., d’Apollonia, S., & Howden, J. (1995). Claroom connections: Understanding and using cooperative leanring. Toronto, Canada: Harcourt-Brace.
  • Aliakbari, M., & Khales Haghighi, J. (2014). Impact of differentiated instruction strategies and traditional-based instruction on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL students. Research in Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 109–129.
  • Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflections on activity theory. Educational Review, 61, 197–210.
  • Banks, J. A. (2002). An introduction to multicultural education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Beecher, M., & Sweeny, S. M. (2008). Closing the achievement gap with curriculum enrichment and differentiation: One school’s story. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 502–530.
  • Bowler, B., & Parminter, S. (2002). Mixed-level teaching: Tiered tasks and bias tasks. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anothology of current practice (pp. 59–68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chamberlin, M., & Powers, R. (2010). The promise of differentiated instruction for enhancing the mathematical understandings of college students. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 29, 113–139.
  • Chen, Y. H. (2007). Exploring the assessment aspect of differentiated instruction: College EFL learners’ perspectives on tiered performance tasks ( Doctorate dissertation). University of New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
  • Chien, C.-W. (2012). Differentiated instruction in an elementary school EFL classroom. TESOL Journal, 3, 280–291.
  • Civitillo, S., Denessen, D., & Molenaar, I. (2016). How to see the classroom through the eyes of a teacher: Consistency between perceptions on diversity and differentiation practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16, 587–591.
  • Clandfield, L. (2010). Global pre-intermediate. Oxford: Macmilan Publishers Limited.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1998). Teacher research: The question that persists. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 1, 19–36.
  • Coll, J. E., Weiss, E. L., & Yarvis, J. S. (2011). No one leaves unchanged: Insights for civilian mental health care professionals into the military experience and culture. Social Work in Health Care, 50, 487–500.
  • Cortazzi, M. (1990). Cultural and educational expectations in the language classroom. In B. Harrison (Ed.), Culture and the language classroom(pp. 54–65). London: Modern English Publications.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Damini, M. (2014). How the Group Investigation model and the Six-Mirror model changed teachers’ roles and teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards diversity. Intercultural Education, 25, 197–205.
  • DeGeorge, P. T. (1987). A code of ethics for officers. In M. M. Watkin, K. Wenker, & J. Kempf (Eds.), Military ethics: Reflectiosn on principles - the profession of arms, military leadership, ethical practices, war and morality, educating the citizen soldier (pp. 13–29). Washington, DC: National Defense University.
  • Elliott, J. (1988). Educational research and outsider‐insider relations. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1, 155–166.
  • Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
  • Exum, H., & Coll, J. E. (2008). A civilian counselor’s primer for counseling veterans. Deerpart, NY: Linus Publicaions, Inc.
  • Faikhamta, C., & Clarke, A. (2015). Thai pre-service science teachers engaging action research during their fifth year internship. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35, 259–273.
  • Flick, U. (2009). An introducation to qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Flowerdew, L. (1998). A cultural perspective on group work. ELT Journal, 52, 323–329.
  • Funday. (2018). Retrieved from https://cafa.funday.asia/
  • Gartin, B. C., Murdick, N. L., Imbeau, M., & Perner, D. E. (2002). How to use differentiated instruction with students with developmental disabilities in the general education classroom. Arlington, VA: Councial for Exceptional Children.
  • Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Ghaith, G. (2003). Effects of the Learning Together Model of cooperative learning on English as a foreign language reading achievement, academic self-esteem, and feelings of school alienation. Bilingual Research Journal, 27, 451–474.
  • Gindis, B. (1999). Vygotsky’s vision: Reshaping the practice of special education for the 21st century. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 333–340.
  • Ginsberg, M. B. (2005). Cultural diversity, motivation, and differentiation. Theory Into Practice, 44, 218–225.
  • Goodnough, K. (2010). Investigating pre-service science teachers’ developing professional knowledge through the lens of differentiated instruction. Research in Science Education, 40, 239–265.
  • Haager, D., & Klingner, J. K. (2005). Differentiating instruction in inclusive classrooms. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
  • Hall, L. K. (2011). The importance of understanding military culture. Social Work in Health Care, 50, 4–18.
  • Harrison, D. (2003). Violence in the military community. In P. R. Higate (Ed.), Military masculinities: Identity and the state (pp. 72–90). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
  • Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners, grades 3-12. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
  • Hinojosa, R. (2010). Doing hegemony: Military, men, and constructing a hegemonic masculinity. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 18, 179–194.
  • Hooker, R. D., Jr. (2003). Solders of the state: Reconsidering American civil-military relations. Parameters, 33(4), 4–18.
  • Hoover, J. J., & Patton, J. R. (2005). Differentiating curriculum and instruction for English-language learners with special needs. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40, 231–235.
  • Hung, Y.-J. (2015). Practice of differentiated instruction and alternative assessments with young EFL learners in Taiwan. TESOL International Journal, 10(2), 48–63.
  • Jalilifar, A. (2010). The effect of cooperative learning techniques on college students’ reading comprehension. System, 38, 96–108.
  • Johnson, B. (2010). A few good boys: Masculinity at a military-style charter school. Men and Masculinities, 12, 575–596.
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1998). Cooperative in the classroom (7th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Books.
  • Kagan, S. (1989). The structural approach to cooperative learning. Educaitonal Leadership, 47(4), 12–15.
  • Kaufman, D. (2004). Constructivist issues in language learning and teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 303–319.
  • Kerr, N. (1983). The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94.
  • Kim, Y. (2012). Implementing ability grouping in EFL contexts: Perceptions of teachers and students. Language Teaching Research, 16, 289–315.
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a thoery of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Research Journal, 32, 465–491.
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. D. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
  • Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Sociocultural theory and second language learning: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 418–420.
  • Levy, H. M. (2008). Meeting the needs of all students through differentiated instruction: Helping every child reach and exceed standards. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81, 161–164.
  • Liao, H.-C. (2015). EFL learner perceptions of differentiated speaking assessment tasks. English Teaching & Learning, 39(1), 29–68.
  • Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423–458.
  • Lytle, S., & Cochran-Smith, M. (1992). Teacher research as a way of knowing. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 447–474.
  • Manavathu, M., & Zhou, G. (2012). The impact of differentiated instructional materials on English language learners (ELL) students’ comprehension of science laboratory tasks. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology, 12, 334–349.
  • Manzon, M., & Areepattamannil, S. (2014). Shadow educations: Mapping the global discourse. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34, 389–402.
  • Marginson, S., & Dang, T. K. A. (2017). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory in the context of globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37, 116–129.
  • Martin, J. A., & McClure, P. (2000). Today’s active duty military familiy: The evolving challenges of military family life. In J. A. Martin, L. N. Rosen, & L. R. Sparacino (Eds.), The military family: A practice guide for human service providers (pp. 3–24). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
  • Meyer, E. G. (2015). The importance of understanding military culture. Academic Psychiatry, 39, 416–418.
  • Ning, H., & Hornby, G. (2014). The impact of cooperative learning on tertiary EFL learners’ motivation. Educational Review, 66, 108–124.
  • Nordlund, M. (2003). Differentiated instruction: Meeting the educational needs of all students in your classroom. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
  • Odgers, S., Symons, A., & Mitchell, I. (2000). Differentiating the curriculum through the use of problem solving. Research in Science Education, 30, 289–300.
  • Palinscar, A. S. (2005). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (2nd ed., pp. 285–314). NY: Routledge.
  • Papanastasiou, E. (2002). Factors that differentiate Mathematics students in Cyprus, Hong Kong, and the USA. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8, 129–146.
  • Recruitment Center of National Armed Forces. (2017). Recruitment documents of national armed forces. Retrieved from https://rdrc.mnd.gov.tw/rdrc/Recruit/A-left01c01.aspx
  • Reid, J. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 87–111.
  • Santa, C. M., & Santa, J. L. (1995). Teacher as researcher. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 439–451.
  • Santamaria, L. (2009). Culturally responsive differentiated instruction: Narrowing gaps between best pedagogical practices benefiting all learners. Teachers College Record, 111, 214–247.
  • Santangelo, T., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2008). The application of differntiated instruction in postsecondary environment: Benefits, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20, 307–323.
  • Sasson-Levey, O. (2008). Individual bodies, collective state interests: The case of Israeli combat soldiers. Men and Masculinities, 10, 296–321.
  • Seale, C., & Silverman, D. (1997). Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. European Journal of Public Health, 7, 379–384.
  • Smagorinsky, P. (2009). The culture of Vygotsky. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 85–95.
  • Szostek, C. (1994). Assessing the effects of cooperative learning in an honors foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 27, 252–261.
  • Tieso, C. (2005). The effects of grouping practices and curricular adjustments on achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(1), 60–89.
  • Tobin, R., & McInnes, A. (2008). Accommodating differences: Variations in differentiated literacy instruction in grade 2/3 classrooms. Literacy, 42, 3–9.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differenciate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Fulfilling the proise of the differentiated classroom: Strateggies and tools for repsonsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervison and Curriculum Development.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2004). Sharing responsibility for differentiating instruction. Proper Review, 26, 188–189.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Respond to the needs of all leaners (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person Education.
  • Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Alexndria, VA: Association for Supervison and Curriculum Development.
  • Valiandes, S. (2015). Evaluating the impact of differentiated instruciton on literacy and reading in mixed ability classrooms: Quality and equity dimensions of education effectivenss. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 17–26.
  • Valiandes, S., Neophytou, L., & Hajisoteriou, C. (2018). Establishing a framework for blending intercultural education with differentiated instruction. Intercultural Education, 29, 379–398.
  • van Garderen, D., & Whittaker, C. (2006). Planning differentiated, multicultural instruction for secondary inclusive classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(3), 12–21.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121–142.
  • Webb, N. M. (1984). Stability of small group interaction in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–39.
  • Willis, P. (1980). Notes on method. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 88–95). London: Hutchinson.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.