From functional literacy to multiliteracies: understanding the challenges of integrating rich and visual texts in Singapore writing classrooms

References

• Albright, J., & Kramer-Dahl, A. (2009). The legacy of instrumentality in policy and pedagogy in the teaching of English: The case of Singapore. Research Papers in Education, 24(2), 201–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning: A role for summative assessment? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Borsheim, C., Merritt, K., & Reed, D. (2008). Beyond technology for technology’s sake: Advancing multiliteracies in the twenty-first century. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82(2), 87–90.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2009). Mashup: Digital media and drama conventions. In M. Anderson, J. Carroll, & D. Cameron (Eds.), Drama education with digital technology (pp. 52–66). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Cara, C. (2010). Welcome to my world: Empowering many though multiliteracies-based inclusive teaching and learning. The International Journal of Learning, 17(7), 523–538.
   Google Scholar
• Cheah, Y.M. (1996). Beyond functional literacy: A new curriculum in Singapore schools. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40(3), 218–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design (pp. 1–36). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Planning and Development Division [CPDD]. (2010). English language teaching and learning syllabus 2010. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Planning and Development Division [CPDD]. (2020). English language teaching and learning syllabus 2020. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A., Webb, S., Lackey, D., & DeVoss, D.N. (2010). Remix, play and remediation: Undertheorized composing practices. In H. Urbanski (Ed.), Writing and the digital generation: Essays on new media rhetoric (pp. 186–197). North Carolina: McFarland & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J.P., & Hayes, E.R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (2000). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gyenes, T., & Wilks, J. (2014). Is the essay dead? Revitalising argument in the era of multiliteracies. English in Australia, 49(1), 7–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, D., & Gopinathan, S. (2008). Knowledge management, sustainable innovation, and pre‐service teacher education in Singapore. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 369–384.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J.M., & Morrison, L. (2014). The impact of social networking and a multiliteracies pedagogy on English language learners’ writer identities. Writing & Pedagogy, 6(3), 607–631.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, S., Ganapathy, M., & Sidhu, G.K. (2012). Designing learning elements using the multiliteracies approach in an ESL writing classroom. The Southeast Journal of English Language Studies, 18(3), 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, K., Chan, J., Fok, P., & Yu, W. (2008). Forms of assessment and their potential for enhancing meaning: Conceptual and cultural issues. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7(3), 197–207.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, T., & Mizusawa, K. (2018). Revisiting the pedagogy of multiliteracies: Writing instruction in a multicultural context. Changing English, 25(1), 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kittle, P., & Gallagher, K. (2020). The curse of “helicopter teaching”. Educational Leadership, 77(6), 14–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2016). Analysing meritocratic (in)equality in Singapore: Ideology, curriculum and reproduction. Critical Studies in Education, 57(2), 160–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mee, C.Y. (1998). The examination culture and its impact on literacy innovations: The case of Singapore. Language and Education, 12(3), 192–209.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K.A. (2009). Multiliteracies: Interrogating competing discourses. Language and Education, 23(2), 103–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New London Group [NLG]. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, S.S., Botelho, M.J., Jang, E., & Kerekes, J. (2007). Writing assessment: What would multiliteracies teachers do? Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 15(1), 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Poon, A. (2007). The politics of pragmatism: Some issues in the teaching of literature in Singapore. Changing English, 14(1), 51–59.
   Google Scholar
• Poon, A. (2010). Constructing the cosmopolitan subject: Teaching secondary school literature in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(1), 31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowsell, J., Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2008). Fostering multiliteracies pedagogy through preservice teacher education. Teaching Education, 19(2), 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey, A. (2007). Writing and teaching writing. Changing English, 14(2), 145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar