“Here we go again”: unfolding HE students’ hybrid experience and resilience during post-covid times

References

• Abuhassna, H., Awae, F., Al Zitawi, D.U.D., Bayoumi, K., & Alsharif, A.H. (2022). Hybrid learning for practical-based courses in higher education organisations: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(1), 1055–1064. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i1/12861
   Google Scholar
• Acosta-Gonzaga, E., & Ruiz-Ledesma, E.F. (2022). Students’ emotions and engagement in the emerging hybrid learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(16), 10236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristika, A., & Juandi, D., (2021). The effectiveness of hybrid learning in improving of teacher-student relationship in terms of learning motivation. Emerging Science Journal, 5(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-01288
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A.W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badiozaman, I. (2021). Exploring online readiness in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1943654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badiozaman, I., Segar, A.R., & Iah, D. (2021). Examining faculty’s online teaching competence during crisis: One semester on. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-11-2020-0381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Freeman, W.H., & Lightsey, R. (1999). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (2007). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bouilheres, F., Le, L.T.V.H., McDonald, S., Nkhoma, C., & Jandug-Montera, L. (2020). Defining student learning experience through blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3049–3069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10100-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2008). The end of the paradigm wars?. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social research methods (pp. 13–25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bustamante, J.C., Segura-Berges, M., Lizalde Gil, M., & Peñarrubia-Lozano, C. (2022). Qualitative analyses of e-learning implementation and hybrid teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic at Spanish universities. Sustainability, 14(19), 12003. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carini, R.M., Kuh, G.D., & Klein, S.P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, T.K. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S14–S30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cureton, D., Jones, J., & Hughes, J. (2021). The Postdigital University: Do We Still Need Just a Little of That Human Touch?. Postdigit Sci Educ, 3, 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00204-6
   Google Scholar
• Dall’alba, G. (2020). Toward a Pedagogy of Responsive Attunement for Higher Education. Philosophy & Theory in Higher Education, 2(2), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.3726/PTIHE022020.0002
   Google Scholar
• Detyna, M., Sanchez-Pizani, R., Giampietro, V., Dommett, E.J., & Dyer, K. (2022). Hybrid flexible (HyFlex) teaching and learning: Climbing the mountain of implementation challenges for synchronous online and face-to-face seminars during a pandemic. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09408-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finn, J.D., & Rock, D.A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203986561
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon, K., Young, B., Bachman, T., Longbottom, T., Severin, R., & Walker, M.J. (2020). Doctor of physical therapy education in a hybrid learning environment: Reimagining the possibilities and navigating a “new normal”. Physical Therapy, 100(8), 1268–1277. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaa096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, B., & Greenhow, C. (2017). Hybrid education: The potential of teaching and learning with robot-mediated communication. Online Learning Journal, 21(4), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies (Dordr), 26(6), 6923–6947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guoyan, S., Khaskheli, A., Raza, S.A., Khan, K.A., & Hakim, F. (2021). Teachers’ self-efficacy, mental well-being and continuance commitment of using learning management system during COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative study of Pakistan and Malaysia. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1978503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, O.P., Jr., & Mooney, J.G. (2010). Hybrid learning systems: Meeting the challenges of graduate management education. In P. Tsang, S.K.S. Cheung, V.S.K. Lee, & R. Huang (Eds.), International Conference on Hybrid Learning 2010: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 6248, pp. 35–48). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_5
   Google Scholar
• Hara, N., Bonk, C.J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115–152. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003764722829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensley, L.C., Iaconelli, R., & Wolters, C.A. (2022). “This weird time we’re in”: How a sudden change to remote education impacted college students’ self-regulated learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S203–S218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1916414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K.F., Hu, X., Qiao, C., & Tang, Y. (2020). What predicts student satisfaction with MOOCs: A gradient boosting trees supervised machine learning and sentiment analysis approach. Computers & Education, 145, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A. (2013). Affect as Method: Feelings, Aesthetics and Affective Pedagogy. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and Research Methodologies (pp. 79–95). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.-C., Backman, S.J., Backman, K.F., McGuire, F.A., & Moore, D. (2019). An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: A self-determination theory. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9784-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Zhao, C., Shu, F., & Huang, J. (2017). Investigating and analysing teaching effect of blended synchronous classroom. 2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT) (pp. 134–135). https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2017.40
   Google Scholar
• Janesick, V.J. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd edn ed., pp. 379–399). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jo, H. (2022). Determinants of continuance intention towards e-learning during COVID-19: An extended expectation-confirmation model. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2140645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamanetz, A. (2020, March 19). Teaching online classes during the coronavirus pandemic. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/03/19/817885991/panic-gogy-teaching-online-classes-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic
   Google Scholar
• Khlaif, Z.N., Salha, S., Affouneh, S., Rashed, H., & ElKimishy, L.A. (2021). The covid-19 epidemic: Teachers’ responses to school closure in developing countries. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 30(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1851752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G.D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, (141), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
   Google Scholar
• Lakhal, S., Bateman, D., & Bédard, J. (2017). Blended synchronous delivery modes in graduate programs: A literature review and how it is implemented in the master teacher program. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v10i0.4747
   Google Scholar
• Lapitan, L.D.S., Tiangco, C.E., Sumalinog, D.A.G., Sabarillo, N.S., & Diaz, J.M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. (2022). The shift to online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic: Benefits, challenges, and required improvements from the students’ perspective. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.1.2106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Li, Z., & Han, J. (2021). A hybrid learning pedagogy for surmounting the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in the performing arts education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7635–7655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10612-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, W.M., Adi Badiozaman, I.F., & Leong, H.J. (2022). Unravelling the expectation-performance gaps in teacher behaviour: A student engagement perspective. Quality in Higher Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2022.2090746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, O. (2014). Student views of hybrid learning. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402454.2008.10784610
   Google Scholar
• Linder, K. (2017). Fundamentals of hybrid teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2017(149), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20222
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-Lledó, A., Lledó, A., Gilabert-Cerdá, A., & Lorenzo, G. (2021). The pedagogical model of hybrid teaching: Difficulties of university students in the context of COVID-19. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(4), 1320–1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11040096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marey, A., Goubran, S., & Tarabieh, K. (2022). Refurbishing classrooms for hybrid learning: Balancing between infrastructure and technology improvements. Buildings, 12(6), 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A.J., Ginns, P., & Collie, R.J. (2023). University students in COVID-19 lockdown: The role of adaptability and fluid reasoning in supporting their academic motivation and engagement. Learning and Instruction, 83(6), 101712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101712
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Müller, A.M., Goh, C., Lim, L.Z., & Gao, X. (2021). COVID-19 emergency e-learning and beyond: Experiences and perspectives of university educators. Education Sciences, 11(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munday, D. (2022). Hybrid pedagogy and learning design influences in a higher education context. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.b5af8bae
   Google Scholar
• Ndzinisa, N., & Dlamini, R. (2022). Responsiveness vs. accessibility: Pandemic-driven shift to remote teaching and online learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.2019199
   Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). Face-to-face, online and hybrid education: University students’ opinions and preferences. Journal of Digital Education Technology, 2(2), ep2206. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/12384
   Google Scholar
• Olapiriyakul, K., & Scher, J.M. (2006). A guide to establishing hybrid learning courses: Employing information technology to create a new learning experience, and a case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(4), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Phan, A.N.Q., Pham, L.T.T., & Ngo, H.N. (2023). Countering stuckness: International doctoral students’ experiences of disrupted mobility amidst COVID-19. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.2175349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pischetola, M. (2022). Teaching novice teachers to enhance learning in the hybrid university. Postdigital Science & Education, 4(1), 70–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00257-1
   Google Scholar
• Raes, A. (2022). Exploring student and teacher experiences in hybrid learning environments: Does presence matter? Postdigital Science & Education, 4(1), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00274-0
   Google Scholar
• Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, D., Evans, J., & Levy, M. (2016). Preserving the seminar experience. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(3), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2015.1077713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner, C. (2002). Cultural psychology: Theory and method. Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0677-5
   Google Scholar
• Rorimpandey, W.H.F., & Midun, H. (2021). Effect of hybrid learning strategy and self-efficacy on learning outcomes. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 48(8), 181–189.
   Google Scholar
• Roshid, M.M., Sultana, S., Kabir, M.M.N., Jahan, A., Khan, R., & Haider, M.D. (2022). Equity, fairness, and social justice in teaching and learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2122024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlechty, P.C. (2011). Engaging students: The next level of working on the work. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She, L., Ma, L., Jan, A., Sharif Nia, H., & Rahmatpour, P. (2021). Online learning satisfaction during COVID-19 pandemic among Chinese university students: The serial mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(743936). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743936
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine and post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E.A., & Pitzer, J.R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory – procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Velamazán, M., Santos, P., & Hernández-Leo, D. (2022). Socio-emotional regulation in collaborative hybrid learning spaces of formal–informal learning. In E. Gil, Y. Mor, Y. Dimitriadis, & C. Köppe (Eds.), Hybrid learning spaces: Understanding teaching-learning practice (pp. 95–111). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management, 41(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00028-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Quek, C.L., & Hu, X. (2017). Designing and improving a blended synchronous learning environment_An educational design research. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weilage, C., & Stumpfegger, E. (2022). Technology acceptance by university lecturers: A reflection on the future of online and hybrid teaching. On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 30(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-09-2021-0110
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, G.L., & Ball, T.R. (2013, June 23–26). The converged classroom [Paper presentation]. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–22561
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.-C., Hsieh, L.-F., & Lu, J.-J. (2015). What’s the relationship between learning satisfaction and continuing learning intention? Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2849–2854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.148
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, J., Sun-Lin, H., Lin, T., Li, M., Pan, Z., & Cheng, H. (2020). What makes learners a good fit for hybrid learning? Learning competences as predictors of experience and satisfaction in hybrid learning space. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, R. (2023). Chinese university EFL learners’ foreign language classroom anxiety and enjoyment in an online learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.2165036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, R., & Sheshasaayee, A. (2021, December 3–4). Challenges identified for the efficient implementation of the hybrid e-learning model during COVID-19. Paper presented at the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Mobile Networks and Wireless Communications (ICMNWC). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMNWC52512.2021.9688533
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, F., Fashola, O., Olarewaju, T., Moran, F., Dobson, P., Reszka, M., & Mitchell, K. (2022). How hybrid learning can enhance the student experience and teaching outcomes in the wake of COVID-19: A case study of a business school in the United Kingdom. In M.H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, & G. Mustafa (Eds.), Eurasian business and economics Perspectives (pp. 69–89). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94672-2_5
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, W.A., & Kulikowich, J.M. (2016). Online learning self-efficacy in students with and without online learning experience. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1193801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zydney, J.M., McKimm, P., Lindberg, R., & Schmidt, M. (2019). Here or there instruction lessons learned in implementing innovative approaches to blended synchronous learning. Tech Trends, 63(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0344-z
   Google Scholar