My teammate is AI: understanding students’ perceptions of student-AI collaboration in drawing tasks

References

• Baker, T., Smith, L., & Anissa, N. (2019). Educ-AI-tion rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. NESTA. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Future_of_AI_and_education_v5_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bansal, G., Nushi, B., Kamar, E., Lasecki, W. S., Weld, D. S., & Horvitz, E. (2019). Beyond accuracy: The role of mental models in human-AI team performance. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, 7 (1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1609/hcomp.v7i1.5285.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, E., Kumar, V., Li, X., Sollers, J., 3rd, Stafford, R.Q., MacDonald, B.A., Wegner, D.M., & Slater, M. (2013). Robots with display screens: A robot with a more humanlike face display is perceived to have more mind and a better personality. PloS One, 8(8), e72589. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., Lee, Y., Cho, J., Baek, J., Shin, D., Lee, S., Shin, J., Bae, C., Kim, B., & Heo, J. (2020). Assessment modeling: Fundamental pre-training tasks for interactive educational systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05505. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.05505
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y.H., Seol, B., Lee, H., Kang, D., & Cho, A.R. (2017). Exploring self-regulation and group-regulation in collaborative problem solving with cloud computing technology. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 23(3), 345–371. https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.23.3.345
   Google Scholar
• Echeverria, V., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Shum, S. B., Chiluiza, K., Granda, R., & Conati, C. (2018). Exploratory versus explanatory visual learning analytics: Driving teachers’ attention through educational data storytelling. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(3), 72–97. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2018.53.6
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P. R., & Lin, X. (2018). I, teacher: Using artificial intelligence (AI) and social robots in communication and instruction. Communication Education, 67(4), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1502459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–607.
   Google Scholar
• Gunkel, D.J. (2012). Communication and artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges for the 21st century. Communication+, 1(1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., Kim, K. H., Rhee, W., & Cho, Y.H. (2021). Learning analytics dashboards for adaptive support in face-to-face collaborative argumentation. Computers & Education, 163, 104041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. S. (2012). The UX book: Process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2017, March). Intelligent tutors as teachers' aides: Exploring teacher needs for real-time analytics in blended classrooms. Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference, New York, NY, USA (pp. 257–266). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027451
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019, June). Designing for complementarity: Teacher and student needs for orchestration support in AI-enhanced classrooms. International conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 157–171). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, H., Han, I., & Ko, Y. (2022). A systematic review of conversational AI in language education: Focusing on the collaboration with human teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2142873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A., Cho, M., Ahn, J., & Sung, Y. (2019). Effects of gender and relationship type on the response to artificial intelligence. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(4), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Jo, I.H., & Park, Y. (2016). Effects of learning analytics dashboard: Analyzing the relations among dashboard utilization, satisfaction, and learning achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Lee, S. S. (2020). A comparative study on the expected roles and appearance of social robots according to students’ personality traits. Journal of Education & Culture, 26(3), 71–91.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Lee, S. S. (2023). Are two heads better than one?: The effect of student-AI collaboration on students’ learning task performance. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS, 67(2), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00788-9
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Lee, H., & Cho, Y.H. (2022). Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: Perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6069–6104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10831-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2012). Anthropomorphism of computers: Is it mindful or mindless? Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., Rajan, B., Venkatesan, R., & Lecinski, J. (2019). Understanding the role of artificial intelligence in personalized engagement marketing. California Management Review, 61(4), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619859317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., & Burriss, S. K. (2020). Critical literacy for a posthuman world: When people read, and become, with machines. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1262–1276. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, U. G., Kang, S. H., Lee, J. C., Choi, S. Y., Choi, W. M., & Lim, C. I. (2020). Development of deep learning-based art learning support tool: Using generative modeling. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 26(1), 207–236. https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.26.1.207
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. S., & Kim, J. (2020). An exploratory study on student-intelligent robot teacher relationship recognized by middle school students. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(4), 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lehne, M., Sass, J., Essenwanger, A., Schepers, J., & Thun, S. (2019). Why digital medicine depends on interoperability. NPJ Digital Medicine, 2(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0158-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liang, C., Proft, J., Andersen, E., & Knepper, R. A. (2019, May). Implicit communication of actionable information in human-AI teams. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York (pp. 1–13). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300325
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., Guo, J., Chen, Y., Yao, C., & Ying, F. (2020). It is your turn: Collaborative ideation with a co-creative robot through sketch. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, United States (pp. 1–14). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376258
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J. A., & Patterson, N. C. (2002). Bridging the gap: Supporting beginning science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(4), 267–282.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. (1994). Using communications media in open and flexible learning. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda, N. (2022). Teachable agent as an interactive tool for cognitive task analysis: A case study for authoring an expert model. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00265-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrikis, M., Cukurova, M., DiMitri, D., Schneider, J., & Drachsler, H. (2021). A short history, emerging challenges and co-operation structures for artificial intelligence in education. Bildung und Erziehung, 74(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.13109/buer.2021.74.3.249
   Google Scholar
• McNeese, N. J., Demir, M., Cooke, N. J., & Myers, C. (2018). Teaming with a synthetic teammate: Insights into human-autonomy teaming. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 60(2), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817743223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, T. R., Tan, K. B., Ong, C., Thomas, A., Chuah, T. L., & McGee, K. (2011, March). Are artificial team-mates scapegoats in computer games. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, New York, NY, United States (pp. 685–688). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958945
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, I. (2022). Towards hybrid human‐AI learning technologies. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 632–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33–35.
   Google Scholar
• Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B., & Dryer, D. C. (1995). Can computer personalities be human personalities? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1995.1042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. (2020). In AI we trust: Ethics, artificial intelligence, and reliability. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(5), 2749–2767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00228-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rzepka, C., & Berger, B. (2018). User interaction with AI-enabled systems: A systematic review of is research. Thirty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 540–547. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano, M. Á., Vidal‐Abarca, E., & Ferrer, A. (2018). Teaching self‐regulation strategies via an intelligent tutoring system (TuinLecweb): Effects for low‐skilled comprehenders. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrdal, D. S., Dautenhahn, K., Walters, M. L., & Koay, K. L. (2008, November). Sharing spaces with robots in a home scenario-anthropomorphic attributions and their effect on proxemic expectations and evaluations in a live HRI trial. In AAAI fall symposium: AI in Eldercare: new solutions to old problems, Amsterdam, Netherlands. (pp. 116–123).
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S.C., Lee, A.V.Y., & Lee, M. (2022). A systematic review of artificial intelligence techniques for collaborative learning over the past two decades. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100097
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2019). How can artificial intelligence enhance education?.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, A., Rummel, N., Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V., Molenaar, I., Campen, C.K., Schiwarz, B., Prusak, N., Swidan, O., Segal, A., & Gal, K. (2018). Orchestration tools for teachers in the context of individual and collaborative learning: What information do teachers need and what do they do with it?. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS].
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Weisz, J. D., Muller, M., Ram, P., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Tausczik, Y., Samulowitz, H., & Gray, A. (2019). Human-AI collaboration in data science: Exploring data scientists’ perceptions of automated AI. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 1–24). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.02309
   Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth, A. (2009). Information obesity. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Mou, Y., Li, Z., & Xu, K. (2020). Investigating American and Chinese subjects’ explicit and implicit perceptions of AI-generated artistic work. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam, K. C., Bigman, Y. E., Tang, P. M., Ilies, R., De Cremer, D., Soh, H., & Gray, K. (2020). Robots at work: People prefer—and forgive—service robots with perceived feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(10), 1557–1572. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar