Using the UTAUT-TPACK model to explain digital teaching behaviour of elementary school mathematics teacher

References

• Abidin, Z., Mathrani, A., & Hunter, R. (2018). Gender-related differences in the use of technology in mathematics classrooms. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(4), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2017-0109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktas, I., & Ozmen, H. (2022). Assessing the performance of Turkish science pre-service teachers in a tpack-practical course. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3495–3528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10757-z
   Google Scholar
• Akyuz, D. (2018). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through performance assessment. Computers & Education, 125, 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alabdulaziz, M.S. (2021). COVID-19 and the use of digital technology in mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7609–7633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10602-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alghazi, S.S., Wong, S.Y., Kamsin, A., Yadegaridehkordi, E., & Shuib, L. (2020). Towards sustainable mobile learning: A brief review of the factors influencing acceptance of the use of mobile phones as learning tools. Sustainability, 12(24), 10527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410527
   Google Scholar
• Al-Nuaimi, M.N., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Learning management systems and technology acceptance models: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5499–5533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10513-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, X., Chai, C.S., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Shen, X., Zheng, C., & Chen, M. (2023). Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5187–5208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11286-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., & Romli, A. (2021). Predicting academic staffs behaviour intention and actual use of blended learning in higher education: Model development and validation. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 28(3), 1223–1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09579-2
   Google Scholar
• Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avvisati, F., Hennessy, S., Kozma, R.B., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Salso-sulphide thermal water in the prevention of recurrent respiratory infections in children. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, 26(4), 941–952. https://doi.org/10.1177/039463201302600412
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ay, Y., Karadag, E., & Acat, M.B. (2015). The technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-Practical) model: Examination of its validity in the Turkish culture via structural equation modeling. Computers & Education, 88, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.017
   Google Scholar
• Aytekin, A., Ozkose, H., & Ayaz, A. (2022). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in mobile learning adoption: Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics & Information Management, 16(1), 75–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2021.2007037
   Google Scholar
• Baydas, O., & Goktas, Y. (2016). A model for preservice teachers’ intentions to use ICT in future lessons. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1232277
   Google Scholar
• Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910600789498
   Google Scholar
• Birch, A., & Irvine, V. (2009). Preservice teachers’ acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: Applying the UTAUT model. Educational Media International, 46(4), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980903387506
   Google Scholar
• Birgin, O., & Acar, H. (2020). The effect of computer-supported collaborative learning using GeoGebra software on 11th grade students’ mathematics achievement in exponential and logarithmic functions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1788186
   Google Scholar
• Borba, M.C. (2021). The future of mathematics education since COVID-19: Humans-with-media or humans-with-non-living-things. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(1), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10043-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borba, M.C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M.S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 48(5), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4
   Google Scholar
• Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research: A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, C., Carlsson, J., Hyvönen, K., Puhakainen, J., & Walden, P. (2006). Adoption of Mobile Devices/Services — searching for answers with the UTAUT. 6, 132a–132a. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2006.38
   Google Scholar
• Castéra, J., Coiffard, C., Chan, M., Sherab, K., Impedovo, M., Sarapuu, T., Delserieys Pedregosa, A., Khatoon Malik, S., & Armand, H. (2020). Self-reported TPACK of teacher educators across six countries in Asia and Europe. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3003–3019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10106-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00339.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone, L., Brøgger, K., Berghmans, M., Decuypere, M., Förschler, A., Grimaldi, E., Hartong, S., Hillman, T., Ideland, M., Landri, P., van de Oudeweetering, K., Player-Koro, C., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., Rönnberg, L., Taglietti, D., & Vanermen, L. (2022). Pandemic acceleration: COVID-19 and the emergency digitalization of European education. European Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 845–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211041793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncheon, J.C., & Tierney, W.G. (2013). Changing conceptions of time: Implications for educational research and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(2), 236–272. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313478492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmaadaway, M.A.N., & Abouelenein, Y.A.M. (2022). In-service teachers’ TPACK development through an adaptive e-learning environment (ALE). Education and Information Technologies, 28, 8273–8298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11477-8
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. The Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1086/209351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foluke, O. (2019). Determinants of electronic book adoption in Nigeria. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 39(4), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.4.14384
   Google Scholar
• Geng, J., Chai, C., Jong, M., & Luk, E. (2019). Understanding the pedagogical potential of interactive spherical video-based virtual reality from the teachers’ perspective through the ACE framework. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1593200
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Trigueros, I.M. (2023). Digital skills and ethical knowledge of teachers with TPACK in higher education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep406. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12874
   Google Scholar
• Granić, A. (2022). Educational technology adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9725–9744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. (2018). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782570
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 60–70. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/29544/
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermita, N., Wijaya, T., Yusron, E., Abidin, Y., Alim, J., & Putra, Z. (2023). Extending unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to understand the acceptance of digital textbook for elementary school in Indonesia. Frontiers in Education, 8, 958800. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.958800
   Google Scholar
• Hornik, S., & Tupchiy, A. (2006). Culture’s impact on technology mediated learning: The role of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Global Information Management, 14(4), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2006100102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyles, C. (2018). Transforming the mathematical practices of learners and teachers through digital technology. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1484799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-K. (2023). Coaching for change: Preparing mathematics teachers for technology integration in differentiated classrooms. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 13913–13941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11684-x
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, S., Flavin, E., & Lee, J.-E. (2023). Exploring research trends of technology use in mathematics education: A scoping review using topic modeling. Education and Information Technologies, 28(8), 10753–10780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11603-0
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, J.S., & González-Gómez, D. (2020). Adapting to PSTs’ pedagogical changes in sustainable mathematics education through flipped e-learning: Ranking its criteria with MCDA/F-DEMATEL. Mathematics, 8(5), 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050858
   Google Scholar
• Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junger, A.P., de Oliveira, V.I., Yamaguchi, C.K., de Oliveira, M.A.M.L., de Aguiar, H.M., & de Lima, B.L.S. (2023). The role of school management in technological practices as a tool for futuristic teaching. Revista de Gestão E Secretariado (Management and Administrative Professional Review), 14(7), 10749–10765. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i7.2426
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D., & Bolger, M. (2016). Analysis of Korean elementary pre-service teachers’ changing attitudes about integrated STEAM pedagogy through developing lesson plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9709-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, S.C., Chan, T.-W., Huang, R., & Cheah, H.M. (2014). A review of e-learning policy in school education in Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Beijing: Implications to future policy planning. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(2–3), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0011-0
   Google Scholar
• Li, N., Zhang, X., & Limniou, M. (2023). A country’s national culture affects virtual learning environment adoption in higher education: A systematic review (2001–2020). Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4407–4425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1967408
   Google Scholar
• Lindfors, M., Pettersson, F., & Olofsson, A.D. (2021). Conditions for professional digital competence: The teacher educators’ view. Education Inquiry, 12(4), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1890936
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Ritzhaupt, A.D., Dawson, K., & Barron, A.E. (2017). Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A multilevel path analysis model. Educational Technology Research & Development, 65(4), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9487-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, S., & Zou, D. (2022). A systematic review of research on technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) for online teaching in the humanities. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 21, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2139026
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, L. (2017). Applying multigroup analysis in PLS-SEM: A step-by-step process. Partial Least Squares Path Modeling, 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_10
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOE. (2013). An opinion on the implementing a project named improvement of information technology application abilities of elementary and secondary school teachers of China. The In-service Education and Training of School Teachers, 12, 3–4. http://ywyc.hnadl.cn/vpn/1008/https/kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3uoqIhG8C44YLTlOAiTRKjw8pKedNdX5_mkCYmAjR9yUjfo6MGPXYjzBEc36OHjQ-qZZHe_1pIs1VVaPMJZ15NtXsVnbBCsB&uniplatform=NZKPT
   Google Scholar
• MOE(2022). Standards for teachers’ digital literacy (in Chinese). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/202302/t20230214_1044634.html
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1523–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of education 4.0. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 194, 122664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122664
   Google Scholar
• Nan, R., & Zhang, H. (2019). Multimedia learning platform development and implementation based on cloud environment. Multimedia Tools & Applications, 78(24), 35651–35664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08187-8
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, P.A., Horberg, E., Dweck, C.S., & Walton, G.M. (2023). A growth-theory-of-interest intervention increases interest in math and science coursework among liberal arts undergraduates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(6), 859. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000798
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou, K., Makri, K., & Roussos, P. (2017). Learning design as a vehicle for developing TPACK in blended teacher training on technology enhanced learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0072-z
   Google Scholar
• Pittalis, M. (2021). Extending the technology acceptance model to evaluate teachers’ intention to use dynamic geometry software in geometry teaching. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(9), 1385–1404. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1766139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poçan, S., Altay, B., & Yaşaroğlu, C. (2023). The effects of mobile technology on learning performance and motivation in mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 683–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11166-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, Y., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao, P., Zhu, X., Guo, Y., Sun, Y., & Qin, C. (2021). The development and adoption of online learning in pre- and post-COVID-19: Combination of technological system evolution theory and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14040162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussinos, D., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2019). Examining primary education teachers’ perceptions of TPACK and the related educational context factors. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(4), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1666323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed, K., & Sidorova, A. (2023). Explaining digital technology: Digital artifact delineation and coalescence. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 63(6), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2165578
   Google Scholar
• Sailer, M., Schultz-Pernice, F., & Fischer, F. (2021). Contextual facilitators for learning activities involving technology in higher education: The C♭-model. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Cruzado, C., Santiago Campión, R., & Sánchez-Compaña, M.T. (2021). Teacher digital literacy: The indisputable challenge after COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(4), 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman, L.S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching (5th ed.). American Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, K., & Nimon, K. (2020). Construct validity of data from a TPACK self-assessment instrument in 2-year public college faculty in the United States. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1790444
   Google Scholar
• Shaqrah, A., & Almrs, A. (2022). Examining the internet of educational things adoption using an extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Internet of Things, 19, 100558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2022.100558
   Google Scholar
• Shim, J., & Yoon, S.A. (2024). Improving STEM education through resource activation: A study of culturally relevant teaching for critical data literacy in a high school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.311si
   Google Scholar
• Skare, M., de Obesso, M.D.L.M., & Ribeiro-Navarrete, S. (2023). Digital transformation and European small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A comparative study using digital economy and society index data. International Journal of Information Management, 68, 102594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E.E., Kahlke, R., & Judd, T. (2020). Not just digital natives: Integrating technologies in professional education contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X., Yuan, Z., Deng, X., & Xiang, L. (2023). Predicting secondary school mathematics teachers’ digital teaching behavior using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Electronic Research Archive, 31(10), 6274–6302. https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2023318
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A multi-group analysis of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.641674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M.O., Hong, Y.Y., & Oates, G. (2017). Innovative Uses of Digital Technology in Undergraduate Mathematics. In E. Faggiano, F. Ferrara, & A. Montone (Eds.) Innovation and Technology Enhancing Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era (Vol. 9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61488-5_6
   Google Scholar
• Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S.V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A.M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosuntaş, Ş., Karadağ, E., & Orhan-Özen, S. (2014). The factors affecting acceptance and use of interactive whiteboard within the scope of FATIH project: A structural equation model based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Computers & Education, 81, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.009
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: In a new social contract for education. https://unes⁃doc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707?posInSet=1&queryId=ceaa8665-88bb-4ac3-9fb8-3a4bafd6ab65
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2022). The ICT competency framework for teachers harnessing OER project: Digital skills development for teachers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000383206?posInSet=1&queryId=c213d75f-952e-4acc-b8c4-be703c79e7e6
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing Digital Transformation, 13–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Viberg, O., Mavroudi, A., Khalil, M., & Balter, O. (2020). Validating an instrument to measure teachers’ preparedness to use digital technology in their teaching. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-01-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-S., & Shih, Y.-W. (2009). Why do people use information kiosks? A validation of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijaya, T., Cao, Y., Bernard, M., Rahmadi, I.F., Lavicza, Z., & Surjono, H.D. (2022). Factors influencing microgame adoption among secondary school mathematics teachers supported by structural equation modelling-based research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 952549. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijaya, T., Cao, Y., Weinhandl, R., Yusron, E., & Lavicza, Z. (2022). Applying the UTAUT model to understand factors affecting micro-lecture usage by mathematics teachers in China. Mathematics, 10(7), 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10071008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K.-T., Teo, T., & Goh, P. (2013). Understanding the intention to use interactive whiteboards: Model development and testing. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.806932
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Du, H. (2012). Toward a better understanding of behavioral intention and system usage constructs. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(6), 680–698. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Z., & Li, S. (2012). Developing prospective mathematics teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A case of normal distribution. In J. Sung (Ed.),Proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education, COEX, Seoul, South Korea (pp. 5804–5813).
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Z., Deng, X., Ding, T., Liu, J., & Tan, Q. (2023a). Factors influencing secondary school teachers’ usage behavior of dynamic mathematics software: A partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method. Electronic Research Archive, 31(9), 5649–5684. https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2023287
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Z., Liu, J., Deng, X., Ding, T., & Wijaya, T. (2023b). Facilitating conditions as the biggest factor influencing elementary school teachers’ usage behavior of dynamic mathematics software in China. Mathematics, 11(6), 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11061536
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, A., & Ma, W. (2002). Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 10, 4225–4258. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-021-10775-x
   Google Scholar
• Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluca, T. (2012). The effect of dynamic mathematics software geogebra on student achievement in teaching of trigonometry. Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences, 31, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.038
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, P., Kynäshlahti, H., & Sintonen, S. (2016). A qualitative analysis of the digital literacy of arts education teachers in Chinese junior high and high schools. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616658341
   Google Scholar