Constructing parallels: Brazilian expertise and the commodification of land, labour and money in Mozambique

References

• ABC (Agência Brasileira de Cooperação). 2010. Catálogo ABC de Cooperação Técnica do Brasil para a África. Brasilia: Agência Brasileira de Cooperação.
   Google Scholar
• Abreu, Fernando. 2013. “O Brasil e a Cooperação Sul-Sul.” Presentation at the BRICS Policy Centre in Rio de Janeiro, June 28.
   Google Scholar
• Akram-Lodhi, H. 2012. “Contextualising Land Grabbing: Contemporary Land Deals, the Global Subsistence Crisis and the World Food System.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 33 (2): 119–142. doi:10.1080/02255189.2012.690726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• allAfrica. 2012. “Mozambique: Agreement on Nacala Fund.” July 6, 2012. Retrieved September 17, 2012. http://allafrica.com/stories/201207061132.html
   Google Scholar
• Arezki, R., K. Deininger, and H. Selod. 2011. “What Drives the Global Land Rush?.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5864. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Batistella, M., and E. Bolfe, eds. 2010. Paralelos: Corredor de Nacala. Campinas, SP: Embrapa Monitormento por Satélite.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2004. “Changing Before Our Very Eyes: Agrarian Questions and the Politics of Land in Capitalism Today.” Journal of Agrarian Change 4 (1–2): 190–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2004.00078.x
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2006. “Agrarian Questions of Capital and Labour: Some Theory about Land Reform (and a Periodisation).” In The Land Question in South Africa. The Challenge of Transformation and Redistribution, edited by Lungisile Ntsebeza and Ruth Hall, 27–59. Cape Town: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow-Strain, A. 2007. Intimate Enemies: Landowners, Power, and Violence in Chiapas. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, Saturnino Jr, David Fig, and Sofia Monsalve Suarez. 2011. “The Politics of Agrofuels and Mega-land and Water Deals: Insights from the ProCana Case, Mozambique.” Review of African Political Economy 38 (128): 215–234. doi:10.1080/03056244.2011.582758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M.Jr. and J. C. Franco. 2010. “Redistributing Land in the Philippines: Social Movements and State Reformers.” In Citizen Action and National Policy Reform: Making Change Happen, edited by J. Gaventa and R. McGee, 69–88. London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S. Jr., C. Kay, S. Gómez, and J. Wilkinson. 2012. “Land Grabbing and Global Capitalist Accumulation: Key Features in Latin America.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 33 (4): 402–416. doi:10.1080/02255189.2012.745394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Lester R. 2011. “The New Geopolitics of Food.” Foreign Policy, May/June. Accessed December 12, 2012. Washington, DC: FP Group. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/04/25/the_new_geopolitics_of_food
   Google Scholar
• Burges, S. 2011. “Brazilian International Development Cooperation: Budgets, Procedures and Issues with Engagement.” Global Studies Review 7 (3): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Captain, Yvonne. 2010. “Brazil's Africa Policy under Lula.” The Global South 4 (1): 183–198. doi:10.2979/GSO.2010.4.1.183
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M., ed. 2010. Combatendo a Desigualdade Social: O MST e a Reforma Agrária no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade Estadual Paulista.
   Google Scholar
• Castro de Rezende, G. 2001. “Inconsistência Espacial da Política de Preços Mínimas e a Questão do Desenvolvimento Agrícola da Região.” Paper presented at the IX Meeting of Economists of Portuguese Language. Evora, Portugal, October 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• CEPAGRI – Mozambican Center for the Promotion of Agriculture. 2011. Procedures Manual for Investments in Agri-Business. Maputo: CEPAGRI.
   Google Scholar
• Chichava, S., J. Duran, L. Cabral, A. Shankland, L. Buckley, T. Lixia, and Z. Yue. 2013. “Brazil and China in Mozambican Agriculture: Emerging Insights from the Field.” IDS Bulletin 44 (4): 101–115. Brighton, United Kingdom: University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies. doi: 10.1111/1759-5436.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dávila, Jerry. 2010. Hotel Trópico: Brazil and the Challenge of African Decolonization, 1950–1980. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deininger, Klaus W., Derek Byerlee, J. Lindsay, A. Norton, H. Selod, and M. Stickler. 2011. Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can it Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, Guilherme da Costa. 1985. Capital Financeiro e Agricultura no Brasil: 1965–1985. São Paulo: Icone/Editora da Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and C. James. 2011. “Peasants’ Rights and the UN System: Quixotic Struggle? Or Emancipatory Idea whose Time has Come?” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (1): 81–108. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embrapa. 2012. História da Embrapa. Brasilia, Brazil: Embrapa. http://www.embrapa.br/
   Google Scholar
• Embrapa. n.d. “Africa, A Continent Full of Opportunities for Agricultural Research.” Brasilia, Brazil: Embrapa. Accessed September 12, 2012. www.cnpmf.embrapa.br/destaques/AFRICA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. 1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M. 2013. “Indirect Dispossession: Domestic Power Imbalances and Foreign Access to Land in Mozambique.” Development and Change 44 (2): 335–356. doi:10.1111/dech.12013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2000. “Land Resource Potential and Constraints at Regional and Country Levels.” World Soil Resources Report 90. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2009. How to Feed the World in 2050. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/expert_paper/How_to_Feed_the_World_in_2050.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Federal Government of Brazil. 2012. Orçamento da União Exercício Financeiro 2013. Ministério do Planajamento, Orçamento e Gestão, Volume IV Tomo 1. Accessed March 20, 2015. http://www.planejamento.gov.br/secretarias/upload/Arquivos/sof/ploa2013/Volume_4_Tomo_I.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Federal Government of Mozambique. 2011. Poverty Reduction Action Plan (PARP) 2011–2014. Maputo, Mozambique: Ministry of Planning and Development.
   Google Scholar
• FGV Projetos. n.d. Nacala Corridor Fund. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Projetos. http://www.oecd.org/forum/issues/NACALA%20CORRIDOR%20FUND-FGV%20Projetos.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, R. E. 2014. “A Agropecuária na Balança Comercial Brasileira.” Política Agrícola 23 (2): 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Freyre, G. 1933. Casa-Grande & Senzala. Rio de Janeiro: Maia y Schmidt.
   Google Scholar
• Freyre, G. 1953. Um Brasileiro em Terras Portuguêses. Rio de Janeiro: Livraria José Olympio.
   Google Scholar
• Frontlines. 2012. “In Development, Three Heads are Better than One.” Partnering for Development, March/April. Washington, DC: USAID.
   Google Scholar
• Galeano, L. A. 2012. “Paraguay and the Expansion of Brazilian and Argentinian Agribusiness Frontiers.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 33 (4): 458–470. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2012.744301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, David, Bernardo Sorj, and John Wilkinson. 1984. “Agro-industry, State Policy and Rural Social Structures: Recent Analyses of Proletarianisation in Brazilian Agriculture.” In Proletarianisation in the Third World, edited by B. Munslow and M. Finch, 189–215. Kent: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano da Silva, José. 1982. A Modernização Dolorosa: Estrutura Agrária, Fronteira Agrícola e Trabalhadores Rurais no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano da Silva, José. 1985. Para Entender o Plano Nacional de Reforma Agrária. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D. 2013. Land. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., and G. Paradza. 2012. “Foxes Guarding the Hen-House: The Fragmentation of ‘The State’ in Negotiations over Land Deals in Congo and Mozambique.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing II, October 17–19, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Hanlon, J. 2002. “Are Donors to Mozambique Promoting Corruption?” Working Paper No. 15. Crisis States Programme, DESTIN, London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, G. 2002. Disabling Globalization: Places of Power in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, co-published with University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, N. 1998. The Chiapas Rebellion: The Struggle for Land and Democracy. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, S. B. 2011. “The New Amazon Geographies: Insurgent Citizenship, ‘Amazon Nation’ and the Politics of Environmentalisms.” Journal of Cultural Geography 28 (1): 203–223. doi:10.1080/08873631.2011.548500
   Google Scholar
• Helfand, Steven M. 1999. “The Political Economy of Agricultural Policy in Brazil: Decision Making and Influence from 1964–1992.” Latin American Research Review 34 (2): 3–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFDC (International Fertilizer Development Center). 2012. “Mozambique Fertilizer Assessment.” Muscle Shoals, AL: IFDC. Accessed November 22, 2014. http://soybeaninnovationlab.illinois.edu/sites/soybeaninnovationlab.illinois.edu/files/Mozambique-Fertilizer-Assessment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2014. World Economic Outlook Database. Washington, DC: IMF. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2014/02/weodata/index.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Kabemba, C., and C. Nhancale. 2012. “Coal Versus Communities: Exposing Poor Practices by Vale and Rio Tinto in Mozambique.” Open Policy. Rosebank, South Africa: South Africa Resource Watch.
   Google Scholar
• Klink, C. A. and A. G. Moreira. 2002. “Past and Current Human Occupation and Land-use.” In The Cerrado of Brazil. Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna, edited by P. S. Oliveira and R. J. Marquis, 69–88. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leite, I. C., B. Suyama, L. T. Waisbich, M. Pomery, J. Constantine, L. Navas-Alemán, A. Shankland, and M. Younis. 2014. Brazil's Engagement in International Development Cooperation: The State of the Debate. Evidence Report #59. Brighton, United Kingdom: University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, W. Arthur. 1954. “Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor.” Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 22: 139–191. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. 2014. Land's End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, C., and C. Boone. 2013. “Introduction: Land Politics in Africa? Constituting Authority Over Territory, Property, and Persons.” Africa 83 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1017/S000197201200068X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1990 [1867]. Capital, Volume 1. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., and W. Wolford. 2011. Land, Energy, Water: From Scarcity to Security. Final Report to Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, B., R. Nehring, and M. Walsh-Dilley. 2014. “The ‘State’ of Food Sovereignty in Latin America: Political Projects and Alternative Pathways in Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1175–1200. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.964217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2000. “World-Systems Analysis, Globalization, and Incorporated Comparison.” Journal of World-Systems Research 1 (3): 68–99.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2006. “Peasant Prospects in the Neoliberal Age.” New Political Economy 11 (3): 407–418. doi: 10.1080/13563460600841041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norfolk, S., and C. Tanner. 2007. Improving Tenure Security for the Rural Poor: Mozambique – Country Case Study. LEP Working Paper #5. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
   Google Scholar
• O'Laughlin, B. 1995. “Past and Present Options: Land Reform in Mozambique.” Review of African Political Economy 22 (63): 99–106. doi:10.1080/03056249508704104
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Michael. 2000. The Invention of Capitalism: Classical Political Economy and the Secret History of Primitive Accumulation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Pierro, Bruno. 2012. “A Missão da Embrapa na África.” Agência Dinheiro Vivo, May 25. Accessed May 29, 2012. http://jornalggn.com.br/blog/luisnassif/a-missao-da-embrapa-na-africa
   Google Scholar
• Pino, Bruno Ayllón. 2013. A Cooperação Triangular e as Transformações da Cooperação Internacional para o Desenvolvimento. Texto para Discussão #1845. Brasilia: Institute for Applied Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 2001 [1957]. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Presidência da República. 2011. “Lei No. 12.383 de 1 de Março de 2011.” Brasilia, Brazil: Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos. Accessed January 4, 2013. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2011/Lei/L12383.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. 2005. The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for our Time. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Schutter, O. 2009. Agribusiness and the Right to Food. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food. Human Rights Council. New York: United Nations, General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• de Schutter, O. 2011. “How Not to Think of Land-Grabbing: Three Critiques of Large-scale Investments in Farmland.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (2): 249–279. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.559008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., L. Cabral, and H. Tugendhat. 2013. “New Development Encounters: China and Brazil in African Agriculture.” IDS Bulletin 44 (4): 1–19. doi:10.1111/1759-5436.12042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith. Adam. 2003 [1776]. The Wealth of Nations. New York: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sumich, J. 2010. “The Party and the State: Frelimo and Social Stratification in Post-socialist Mozambique.” Development and Change 41 (4): 679–698. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01653.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, Christopher. 2010. “Land Rights and Enclosures: Implementing the Mozambican Land Law in Practice.” In The Struggle over Land in Africa: Conflicts, Politics, and Change, edited by W. Anseeuw and C. Alden, 105–130. Cape Town: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• TIA. 2008. Trabalho de Inquérito Agrícola. Agriculture Surveys. Maputo: MINAG/DE.
   Google Scholar
• Urioste, M. 2012. “Concentration and “Foreignisation” of Land in Bolivia.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 33 (4): 439–457. doi:10.1080/02255189.2012.743878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Braun, J. 2009. “Addressing the Food Crisis: Governance, Market Functioning, and Investment in Public Goods.” Food Security 1 (1): 9–15. doi:10.1007/s12571-008-0001-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. 2008. Landmarked: Land Claims and Land Restitution in South Africa. Cape Town: Jacana Press. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warnken, P. F. 1999. The Development and Growth of the Soybean Industry in Brazil. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wittman, H. 2010. “Agrarian Reform and the Environment: Fostering Ecological Citizenship in Mato Grosso, Brazil.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 29 (3–4): 281–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2008. “Environmental Justice and the Construction of Scale in Brazilian Agriculture.” Society and Natural Resources 21 (7): 641–655. doi:10.1080/08941920802096432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. Forthcoming. “From Pangaea to Partnership: The Many Fields of Rural Development in Mozambique.” Sociology of Development.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2008. World Development Report, 2008. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2010. “South–South Cooperation is a Force for Change.” Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved November 20, 2014. http://wbi.worldbank.org/wbi/stories/south-south-high-level-event-colombia
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2011. Bridging the Atlantic, Brasil and Sub-Saharan Africa: South–South Partnering for Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• WRI (World Resources Institute). 2008. World Resources 2008: The Roots of Resilience: Growing the Wealth of the Poor. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A., and W. Wolford. 2003. To Inherit the Earth. Oakland, CA: Food First! Press.
   Google Scholar