Direct democracy in mining conflicts in Latin America: mobilising against the La Colosa project in Colombia

References

• Abromeit, Heidrun. 2003. “Nutzen und Risiken direktdemokratischer Instrumente.” In Demokratisierung der Demokratie, edited by Claus Offe, 95–110. Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Acquatella, Jean. 2013. “Latin America Mining Sector: Review in Current Trends and Prospects.” Presentation at UNECE-IAEA UNFC Workshop, July 9–13. Santiago de Chile. Accessed 26 May 2017. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/energy/se/pp/unfc_egrc/unfc_ws_IAEA_CYTED_UNECE_Santiago_July2013/9_July/10_Acquatella_LatAm_MiningSector.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilar-Støen, Mariel, and Cecilie Hirsch. 2017. “Bottom-up Responses to Environmental and Social Impact Assessments: A Case Study from Guatemala.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 62 (Supplement C): 225–232.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, Sonia, Evelina Dagnino, and Arturo Escobar, eds. 1998. Culture of Politics – Politics of Cultures: Revisioning Latin American Social Movements. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• AngloGold Ashanti. 2015. “La Colosa, una oportunidad de oro para el Tolima.” Accessed 29 November 2015. http://www.anglogoldashanti.com.co/saladeprensa/Presentaciones/presentacion_lacolosa_2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Arenas, Natalia. 2015. “Hoy: el día D del oro.” La Silla Vacía. February 13. Accessed 28 September 2015. http://lasillavacia.com/historia/hoy-el-dia-d-del-oro-49576.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. 1963. On Revolution. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, Peter, and Aryeh Botwiniek. 1992. Power and Empowerment: A Radical Theory of Participatory Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, Anthony, and Jeffrey Bury. 2013. Subterranean Struggles: New Dynamics of Mining, Oil, and Gas in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, Andrea. 2002. Making Spaces, Changing Places: Situating Participation in Development. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, Andrea. 2007. “Spaces for Transformation? Reflections on Issues of Power and Difference in Participation in Development.” In Participation. From Tyranny to Transformation? edited by Samuel Hickey, and Giles Mohan, 85–91. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, Kristina. 2017. “Politics of Scale and Struggles over Mining in Colombia.” In Contested Extractivism, Society and the State: Struggles over Mining and Land, edited by Bettina Engels, and Kristina Dietz, 127–148. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, Bettina. 2016. “Mining Conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa: Actors and Repertoires of Contention.” GLOCON Woking Paper Series, no. 2. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Garcés Villamil, Miguel Ángel, and William Gabriel Rapalino Bautista. 2015. “La Consulta Popular como mecanismo de participación ciudadana para evitar actividades mineras.” Justicia Juris 11 (1): 52–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, John. 2007. “Towards Participatory Governance: Assessing the Transformative Possibilities.” In Participation. From Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development, edited by Samuel Hickey, and Giles Mohan, 25–41. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grajales, Jacobo. 2015. “Land Grabbing, Legal Contention and Institutional Change in Colombia.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (3–4): 541–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoetmer, Raphael. 2010. “Esta democracia, ya no es democracia: Reflexiones a propósito de la consulta vecinal sobre la minería en la frontera norte del Perú.” YUYAYKUSUN 3: 183–208.
   Google Scholar
• Holland-Cunz, Barbara. 1998. Feministische Demokratietheorie: Thesen zu einem Projekt. Opladen: Barbara-Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• ICMM. 2014. The Role of Mining in National Economies: Mining’s Contribution to Sustainable Development. 2nd ed. London: International Council on Mining & Metals.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2007. “The Role of the Political Elite in Swiss Direct-Democratic Votes.” In Direct Democracy in Europe: Developments and Prospects, edited by Zoltán Tibor Pállinger, B. Kaufmann, W. Marxer, and T. Schiller, 82–93. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, David S. 2004. “Protest and Political Opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 125–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möckli, Silvano. 1994. Direkte Demokratie: Ein Vergleich der Einrichtungen in der Schweiz und Kalifornien unter Berücksichtigung von Frankreich, Italien, Dänemark, Irland, Österreich, Liechtenstein und Australien. Bern: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Özkaynak, Begüm, and Beatriz Rodríguez-Labajos. 2012. “Mining Conflicts around the World. Common Grounds from an Environmental Justice Perspective.” EJOLT Report no. 07. Accessed 17 November 2016. http://www.ejolt.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Mining-Report-low.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Perreault, Tom. 2015. “Performing Participation: Mining, Power, and the Limits of Public Consultation in Bolivia.” The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 20 (3): 433–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D., Robert Leonardi, and Raffaella Y. Nonetti. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Ttraditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, Elisabet. 2012. “Transformations in Citizenship: Local Resistance against Mining Projects in Huehuetenango (Guatemala).” Journal of Developing Societies 28 (2): 159–184.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, Elisabet. 2017. “Citizens, Criminalization and Violence in Natural Resource Conflicts in Latin America.” European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe 103: 131–142.
   Google Scholar
• Renauld, Martin. 2016. “The Esquel Effect: Political Opportunity Structure and Adaptation Mechanisms in Anti-mining Mobilisation in Argentine Patagonia.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 37 (4): 524–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, Birgit. 2002. “Demokratie und Geschlecht: Institutionelle Verhältnisse und Verhinderungen.” In Die Bürgergesellschaft: Perspektiven für Bürgerbeteiligung und Bürgerkommunikation, edited by Thomas Meyer, and Reinhard Weil, 116–138. Bonn: J.H.W. Dietz.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, Theo. 2007. “Direct Democracy and Theories of Participatory Democracy: Some Observations.” In Direct Democracy in Europe: Developments and Prospects, edited by Zoltán Tibor Pállinger, B. Kaufmann, W. Marxer, and T. Schiller, 52–63. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Svampa, Maristella, and Mirta Alejandra Antonelli. 2009. Minería transnacional, narrativas del desarrollo y resistencias sociales. Buenos Aires: Biblos.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney G. 1996. “States and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald, 41–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terwindt, Carloijn, and Christian Schliemann. 2017. Supporting Civil Society under Pressure – Lessons from Natural Resource Exploitation. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Van Cott, Donna Lee. 2008. Radical Democracy in the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, Mariana, and Leire Urkidi. 2017. “Community Mining Consultations in Latin America (2002–2012): The Contested Emergence of a Hybrid Institution for Participation.” Geoforum 84: 265–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welp, Yanina. 2008. “La participación ciudadana en la encrucijada: Los mecanismos de democracia directa en Ecuador, Perú y Argentina.” Iconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 31: 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. 2009. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar