Optimal design of traffic calming devices using computer simulation

References

• World Health Organization (WHO-2013). Global status report on road safety (2013), supporting a decade of action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. p. 1–318.
   Google Scholar
• Weber PA, Braaksma JP. Towards a North American geometric design standard for speed humps. Ite J. 2000;70(1):30–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO-2004). In: Peden M, Scurfield R, Sleet D, et al., editors. World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. p. 1–244.
   Google Scholar
• Pasanen E. Driving speeds and pedestrian safety. Finland: Helsinki; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Antić B, Pešić D, Vujanić M, et al. The influence of speed bumps heights to the decrease of the vehicle speed–Belgrade experience. Saf Sci. 2013;57:303–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards DC. Relationship between speed and risk of fatal injury: pedestrians and car occupants; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Champness PG, Sheehan MC, Folkman LM. Time and distance halo effects of an overtly deployed mobile speed camera. Road Safety Research Policing and Education Conference, 14–16 November; 2005; Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott MA, Broughton J. How methods and levels of policing affect road casualty rates. TRL Report 637. Wokingham, England: Transport Research Laboratory; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn F, Collier T, Frost C, et al. Area-wide traffic calming for preventing traffic related injuries. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman L, Macpherson A, Buliung R, et al. Installation of speed humps and pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in Toronto, Canada: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaitkus A, Čygas D, Jasiūnienė V, et al. Traffic calming measures: an evaluation of the effect on driving speed. Promet – Traffic Transp. 2017;29(3):275–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziolkowski R. Influence of traffic calming measures on drivers’ behavior. The 9th International Conference “Environmental Engineering”; 2014 May; Vilnius, Lithuania. Available from: http://enviro.vgtu.lt
   Google Scholar
• Moreno A, García A. Use of speed profile as surrogate measure: effect of traffic calming devices on crosstown road safety performance. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;61:23–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munjin MA, Zamorano JJ, Marré B, et al. Speed hump spine fractures: injury mechanism and case series. Clin Spine Surg. 2011;24(6):386–389.
   Google Scholar
• Ghafghazi G, Hatzopoulou M. Simulating the air quality impacts of traffic calming schemes in a dense urban neighborhood. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2015;35:11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jazcilevich A, Vázquez J, Ramírez P, et al. Economic-environmental analysis of traffic-calming devices. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2015;36:86–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowrey D, Thomas R, Evans R, et al. Road humps: accident prevention or hazards? J Accid Prev Hazards. 1997;13:288–289.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster S, Elliott M, Kelly S. Evidence that implementation intentions reduce drivers’ speeding behavior: testing a new intervention to change driver behavior. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;74:229–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin A, Ozqur K, Yavuz K, et al. Speed bump-induced spinal column injury. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23:563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankarani HM. Current issues regarding aircraft crash injury protection. Crashworthiness of Transportation Systems: Structural Impact and Occupant Protection; 1997; Kluwer, Dordrecht, p.579–612.
   Google Scholar
• U’Brien J. Analysis aims to reduce injuries while travelling underground. Report SB15-06. NSW Government, Department of Industry, Mine safety; 2015. Available from: www.resourcesandenergey.nsw.gov.au/safety
   Google Scholar
• Watts GR. Road humps for the control of vehicle speeds. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Lab. Report # 597, Department of Environment and Department of Transport, Crow Thorne. Berkshire, United Kingdom; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin MJ. Handbook of human vibration, London. 1st ed. United Kingdom: Academic Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 2631-1. Mechanical vibration and shock - evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration - part 1: general requirements. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Khorshid E, Alfares M. Model refinement & experimental evaluation of optimized design of speed humps. Int J Veh Syst Model Testing. 2007;2(1):80–99.
   Google Scholar
• Khorshid E, Alkalby F, Kamal H. Measurement of whole-body vibration exposure from speed control humps. J Sound Vib. 2007;304:640–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorshid AM, Majeed A. Optimal design of speed control dip based on human comfort & health. The Second International Conference on Modeling, Simulation, and Applied Optimization, The Petroleum Institute; 2010; Abu Dhabi, UAE.
   Google Scholar
• Khorshid E, Alfares M. Numerical study on the optimal geometric design of speed control humps. J Glob Optim. 2004;36(1/February):77–100.
   Google Scholar
• Botha T, Els P, Uys P, et al. Profile optimization of table top speed hump for speed control. ASME 2011, International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers; Washington, DC; 2011. p. 733–738.
   Google Scholar
• Sezgin A, Arslan Y. Analysis of the vertical vibration effects on ride comfort of vehicle driver. J Vibro Eng. 2012;14:559–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qassem W, Othman MO, Abdul-Majeed S. The effects of vertical and horizontal vibrations on the human body. Med Eng Phys. 1994;16(2):151–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO/DIS 2631-5. Mechanical vibration and shock - evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration - part 5: method for evaluation of vibration containing multiple shocks. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• BS6841:1987. Guide for evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shocks. London: British Standard Institution; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Blood RP, Rynell PW, Johnson PW. Vehicle design influences whole body vibration exposures: effect of the location of the front axle relative to the cab. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011;8(6):364–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekulić D, Dedović V, Rusov S. Effect of shock vibrations due to speed control humps to the health of city bus drivers. Sci Res Essays. 2012;7(5):573–585.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund J, Brandt A. Bus drivers’ exposure to mechanical shocks due to speed bumps. Proceedings of the 26th International Modal Analysis Conference; 2008 February; Orlando, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund J, Lindström F, Vägen R. Design of a shock-free speed hump. Proceedings, 10th international congress on sound and vibration; 2003 July 7; Stockholm, Sweden. Vol. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Thamsuwan O, Blood RP, Ching RP, et al. Whole body vibration exposures in bus drivers: A comparison between a high-floor coach and a low-floor city bus. Inter J Ind Ergon. 2013;43(1):9–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Wahed TA, Hashim IH. Effect of speed hump characteristics on pavement condition. J Traffic Transport Eng (English Edition). 2017;4(1):103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RR. ADAMS—Multibody system analysis software. In: Multibody systems handbook. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1990. p. 361–402.
   Google Scholar
• Akanmu A, Alabi F, Agboola O. Toward efficient application of speed-bumps as traffic calming device. J Environ Sci Resour Manage. 2014;6:127–136.
   Google Scholar
• Berloco N, Colonna P, Intini P, et al. Low-cost smartphone-based speed surveying methods in proximity to traffic calming devices. Procedia Comput Sci. 2018;134:415–420.
   Google Scholar
• Ardeh HA, Shariatpanahi M, Bahrami MN. Multiobjective shape optimization of speed humps. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2008;37(2):203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başlamişli SC, Ünlüsoy YS. Optimization of speed control hump profiles. J Transp Eng. 2009;135(5):260–269.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson L, Nedzesky AJ. A comparative study of speed humps, speed slots and speed cushions. Lake Buena Vista (FL): ITE Annual Meeting; 2004 August.
   Google Scholar
• Khorshid E, AlAli F, Alfares M. Performance analysis of speed control humps and dips based on health and comfort criteria. Int J Veh Noise Vibr. 2017;13(3–4):295–325.
   Google Scholar
• Kumara V, Saranb V, Guruguntla V. Study of vibration dose value and discomfort due to whole body vibration exposure for a two wheeler drive. Indian Institute of Technology. International and 16 National Conference on Machines and Mechanism; 2013. India: IIT Roorkee. p. 947–952.
   Google Scholar
• Dedović V, Sekulić D. Effect of shock vibrations due to speed control humps to the health of city bus passengers using oscillatory model with six DOF. International conference on traffic and transport engineering; 2012 Nov 29–30; Belgrade, Serbia; 2012; p. 633–642.
   Google Scholar
• Molan AM, Kordani AA. Optimization of speed hump profiles based on vehicle dynamic performance modeling. J Transp Eng. 2014;140(8):04014035.
   Google Scholar
• Bachok KS, Hamsa AA, bin Mohamed MZ, et al. A theoretical overview of road hump effects on traffic noise in improving residential well-being. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017;25:3383–3397.
   Google Scholar