State-varying optimal decoupled sliding mode control for the Lorenz chaotic nonlinear problem based on HEPSO and MLS

References

• Piccardi C, Rinaldi S. Optimal control of chaotic systems via peak-to-peak maps. Phys D. 2000;144(3–4):298–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Gohary A, Sarhan A. Optimal control and synchronization of Lorenz system with complete unknown parameters. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2006;30(5):1122–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Li Y, Liu B, et al. Model-free control of Lorenz chaos using an approximate optimal control strategy. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2012;17(12):4891–4900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin L, Zhang Y, Qiao T, et al. Tracking control of modified Lorenz nonlinear system using ZG neural dynamics with additive input or mixed inputs. Neurocomputing. 2016;196:82–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao R. A novel track control for Lorenz system with single state feedback. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2019;122:236–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Braselton J, Jin Y, et al. Adaptive control of bi-directionally coupled Lorenz systems with uncertainties. J Franklin Inst. 2019;356(3):1287–1301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoodabadi MJ, Momennejad S, Bagheri A. Online optimal decoupled sliding mode control based on moving least squares and particle swarm optimization. Inf Sci. 2014;268:342–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoodabadi MJ, Bagheri A, Nariman-zadeh N, et al. Pareto design of decoupled sliding-mode controllers for nonlinear systems based on a multiobjective genetic algorithm. J Appl Math. 2012;2012:1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayramoglu H, Komurcugil H. Nonsingular decoupled terminal sliding-mode control for a class of fourth-order nonlinear systems. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2013;18(9):2527–2539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayramoglu H, Komurcugil H. Time-varying sliding-coefficient based decoupled terminal sliding-mode control for a class of fourth-order systems. ISA Trans. 2014;53(4):1044–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Yan Y. Decoupled nonsingular terminal sliding mode control for affine nonlinear systems. J Syst Eng Electron. 2016;27:192–200.
   Google Scholar
• Ashtiani Haghighi D, Mobayen S. Design of an adaptive super-twisting decoupled terminal sliding mode control scheme for a class of fourth-order systems. ISA Trans. 2018;75:216–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JH, Ya HT, Hung W. Design and study on sliding mode extremum seeking control of the chaos embedded particle swarm optimization for maximum power point tracking in wind power systems. Energies. 2014;7(3):1706–1720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djari A, Bouden T, Boulkroune A. Design of fractional-order sliding mode controller (FSMC) for a class of fractional-order non-linear commensurate systems using a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Control Eng Appl Inf. 2014;16:46–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang EC, Yang LS, Liao KY. Particle swarm-based terminal sliding mode control with grey predictor of a single-phase inverter for electric vehicles. Int J Electr Energy. 2015;3(3):186–190.
   Google Scholar
• Chang EC, Su Z, Xu Z, et al. Particle swarm optimization tuned fuzzy terminal sliding mode control for UPS inverters. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2015;29(6):2483–2488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soufi Y, Kahla S, Bechouat M. Particle swarm optimization based sliding mode control of variable speed wind energy conversion system. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(45):20956–20963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouya M, Vahidi Pashaki P. The optimal design of fractional sliding mode control based on multi-objective genetic algorithms for a two-link flexible manipulator. Adv Sci Technol Res J. 2017;11(3):56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang P, Guo R, Pan X, et al. Study on the sliding mode fault tolerant predictive control based on multi agent particle swarm optimization. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2017;15(5):2034–2042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong H, Song R, Guo XY, et al. A simple characteristic model-based adaptive control for unstable processes with time delay. Int J Model Simulat. 2017;37(3):156–166.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoodabadi MJ, Bisheban M. An online optimal linear state feedback controller based on MLS approximations and a novel straightforward PSO algorithm. Trans Inst Meas control. 2014;36(8):1132–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirfakhrian M, Mafikandi H. Approximation of parametric curves by moving least squares method. Appl Math Comput. 2016;283:290–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong H, Wu Q. Learning performance of regularized moving least square regression. J Comput Appl Math. 2017;325:42–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Song G, Yao G. Piece-wise moving least squares approximation. Appl Numer Math. 2017;115:68–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Li S. Analysis of the complex moving least squares approximation and the associated element-free Galerkin method. Appl Math Modell. 2017;47:45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Zheng H, Sun G. The moving least squares based numerical manifold method for vibration and impact analysis of cracked bodies. Eng Fract Mech. 2018;190:410–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoodabadi MJ, Mahmoodabadi F, Atashafrooz M. Development of the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method to analyze three-dimensional transient incompressible laminar fluid flow. J Serb Soc Comput Mech. 2018;12(2):128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoodabadi MJ, Salahshoor Mottaghi Z, Bagheri A. HEPSO: high exploration particle swarm optimization. Inf Sci. 2014;273:101–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng CC, Chen CL. Robust chaotic control of Lorenz system by backstepping design. Chaos Soliton Fract. 2008;37(2):598–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoodabadi MJ, Taherkhorsandi M. Optimal robust design of sliding-mode control based on multi-objective particle swarm optimization for chaotic uncertain problems. Int J Adv Des Manuf Technol. 2017;10:115–126.
   Google Scholar