A review on intelligence algorithms for THD minimization in multi-level inverter

References

• Vijeh M, Rezanejad M, Samadaei E, et al. A general review of multi-level inverters based on main submodules: Structural point of view. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2019;34(10):9479–9502. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2018.2890649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana RA, Patel SA, Muthusamy A, et al. Review of multi-level voltage source inverter topologies and analysis of harmonics distortions in FC-MLI. Electronics. 2019;8(11):1329. doi: 10.3390/electronics8111329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury S, Bajaj M, Dash T, et al. Multi-level inverter: a survey on classical and advanced topologies, control schemes, applications to power system and future prospects. Energies. 2021;14(18):5773. doi: 10.3390/en14185773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabaharan N, Palanisamy K. A comprehensive review on reduced switch multi-level inverter topologies, modulation techniques and applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2017;76:1248–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan GK, Rivera M, Loganathan V, et al. Trends and challenges in multi-level inverter with reduced switches. Electronics. 2021;10(4):368. doi: 10.3390/electronics10040368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayalakshmi S, Sivaraman PR, Karthick R, et al. Implementation of a new Bi-Directional Switch multi-level inverter for the reduction of harmonics. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020;937(1):012026. IOP Publishing. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/937/1/012026
   Google Scholar
• Biswas PP, Awad NH, Suganthan PN, et al. Minimizing THD of multi-level inverters with optimal values of DC voltages and switching angles using LSHADE-EpSin algorithm. In: 2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC); Donostia, Spain. IEEE; 2017. p. 77–82.
   Google Scholar
• Memon MA, Mekhilef S, Mubin M, et al. Selective harmonic elimination in inverters using bio-inspired intelligent algorithms for renewable energy conversion applications: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2018;82:2235–53. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juyal VD, Upadhyay N, Singh KV, et al. Comparative harmonic analysis of diode clamped multi-level inverter. In: 2018 3rd International Conference on Internet of Things: Smart Innovation and Usages (IoT-SIU); Bhimtal, India. 2018. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh WA, Said NA, Abd Halim W. Harmonic minimization of a single-phase asymmetrical TCHB multi-level inverter based on nearest level control method. Int J Pow Elec & Dri Syst ISSN. 2020;2088:1407.
   Google Scholar
• Jeevananthan S, JEEVANANTHAN S. Influence of crossover methods used by genetic algorithm-based heuristic to solve the selective harmonic equations (SHE) in multi-level voltage source inverter. Sadhana. 2015;40:2389–2410. doi: 10.1007/s12046-015-0422-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderipour A, Abdul-Malek Z, Noorden ZA, et al. Carrier wave optimization for multi-level photovoltaic system to improvement of power quality in industrial environments based on salp swarm algorithm. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2021;21:101197. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anjali Krishna R, Padmasuresh L, Muthukumar P. Genetic algorithm based 15 level multi-level inverter with SHE PWM. Int J Eng Technol. 2018;7(2.33):893–897.
   Google Scholar
• Muthyala UR, Dhabale A. Comparative analysis of switching angle calculation methods for multi-level inverters. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst. 2021;31(8):e12978. doi: 10.1002/2050-7038.12978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouzou AL, Krama A, Refaat SS, et al. Selective Harmonic Elimination PWM for a Cascaded Multi-level Inverter. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT); Buenos Aires, Argentina. 2020. p. 1145–1150.
   Google Scholar
• Shravani C, Veluri S Reduction of harmonic content for power electronic applications using diode-clamped-multi level inverters. In: 2020 IEEE-HYDCON; Hyderabad, India. 2020. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Noroozi M, Abrishamifar A, Rezaierad G. A new carrier-based pulse width modulation scheme with reduced output voltage total harmonic distortion for multi-level inverters. IETE J Res. 2022;68(6):4394–405. doi: 10.1080/03772063.2020.1793693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas AS, El-Sehiemy RA, Abou El-Ela A, et al. Optimal harmonic mitigation in distribution systems with inverter based distributed generation. Appl Sci. 2021;11(2):774. doi: 10.3390/app11020774
   Google Scholar
• Yaqoob MT, Rahmat MK, Maharum SM, et al. A review on harmonics elimination in real time for cascaded H-bridge multi-level inverter using particle swarm optimization. Int J Power Electron Drive Syst. 2021;12(1):228. doi: 10.11591/ijpeds.v12.i1.pp228-240
   Google Scholar
• Kiani-Moghaddam M, Shivaie M, Weinsier PD. A techno-economic multi-objective model for hybrid harmonic filter planning considering uncertainty in non-linear loads. I Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2019;112:339–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai SK, Mathew L, Shimi SL Software and hardware implementation of a nine level inverter with low component count. In: IECON 2020 the 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society; Singapore. 2020. p. 3318–3324.
   Google Scholar
• Akdogan ME, Ahmed S Control hardware-in-the-loop for voltage controlled inverters with unbalanced and non-linear loads in stand-alone photovoltaic (pv) islanded microgrids. In: 2020 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE); Detroit, MI, USA. 2020. p. 2431–2438.
   Google Scholar
• Awad FH, Mansour AA, Marei MI, et al. Compensation the unbalance of non-linear load based on three-leg center-split inverter four wire. In: 2019 6th International Conference on Advanced Control Circuits and Systems (ACCS) & 2019 5th International Conference on New Paradigms in Electronics & information Technology (PEIT); Hurgada, Egypt. 2019. p. 229–236.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi S, Sahnesaraie MA, Talami SH, et al. Determine the optimal switching angles symmetrical cascaded multi-level inverter using improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. In: 2020 IEEE 18th World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI); Herlany, Slovakia. 2020. p. 329–336.
   Google Scholar
• Azeem H, Yellasiri S, Jammala V, et al. A fuzzy logic based switching methodology for a cascaded H-bridge multi-level inverter. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2019;34(10):9360–4. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2907226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecati C, Ciancetta F, Siano P. A multilevel inverter for photovoltaic systems with fuzzy logic control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2010 Mar 1;57(12):4115–25. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2010.2044119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu S, Burman AD, Giri SK, et al. Comparative study between different optimization techniques for finding precise switching angle for SHE‐PWM of three‐phase seven‐level cascaded H‐bridge inverter. IET Power Electron. 2018;11(3):600–609. doi: 10.1049/iet-pel.2017.0530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes MM, Alquicira JA, Aldaco SD, et al. Calculation of optimal switching angles for a Multi-level Inverter using NR and GA-a comparison. In: 2018 14th International Conference on Power Electronics (CIEP); Ixtapa, Mexico. 2018. p. 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ganesan RG, Bhaskar M, Narayanan K Novel 11-level multi-level inverter. In: 2018 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia (ISGT Asia); Singapore. 2018. p. 1050–1055.
   Google Scholar
• Mehdi Belkacem RI E, Benzid R, Bouguechal N. Multi-level inverter with optimal THD through the firefly algorithm. Arch Electr Eng. 2017;66(1):141–154. doi: 10.1515/aee-2017-0010
   Google Scholar
• Sunddararaj SP, Srinivasarangan Rangarajan S, N S. An extensive review of multi-level inverters based on their multifaceted structural configuration, triggering methods and applications. Electronics. 2020;9(3):433. doi: 10.3390/electronics9030433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharna V. Diode clamped multi-level inverter switching topology. Int J Ind Electron Electr Eng. 2017;5(11):31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Murugesan M, Pari R, Sivakumar R, et al. Different types of multi-level inverter topologies–A technical review. Int J Eng Adv Technol. 2016;7(1):149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker R, Datta A, Debnath S. An improved multicarrier PWM (MCPWM) technique with a new harmonic mitigation strategy for cascaded H-bridge multi-level inverter applications. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2021;18(3):1500–1510. doi: 10.1109/TII.2021.3087458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarwar MI, Sarwar A, Farooqui SA, et al. A hybrid nearest level combined with PWM control strategy: analysis and implementation on Cascaded H-Bridge Multi-level Inverter and its fault tolerant topology. IEEE Access. 2021;9:44266–44282. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katoch S, Chauhan SS, Kumar V. A review on genetic algorithm: past, present, and future. Multimedia Tools Appl. 2021;80(5):8091–126. doi: 10.1007/s11042-020-10139-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shami TM, El-Saleh AA, Alswaitti M, et al. Particle swarm optimization: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Access. 2022;10:10031–61. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullahi M, Ngadi MA, Dishing SI, et al. A survey of symbiotic organisms search algorithms and applications. Neural Comput Appl. 2020;32(2):547–566. doi: 10.1007/s00521-019-04170-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abualigah L, Yousri D, Abd Elaziz M, et al. Aquila optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2021;157:107250. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehab M, Khader AT, Al-Betar MA. A survey on applications and variants of the cuckoo search algorithm. Appl Soft Comput. 2017;61:1041–59. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.02.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Z, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. A pigeon-inspired optimization algorithm for many-objective optimization problems. Sci China Inf Sci. 2019;62(7):70212–1. doi: 10.1007/s11432-018-9729-5
   Google Scholar
• Abualigah L, Shehab M, Alshinwan M, et al. Salp swarm algorithm: a comprehensive survey. Neural Comput Appl. 2020;32(15):11195–215. doi: 10.1007/s00521-019-04629-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque-Chang A, Cuevas E, Fausto F, et al. Social spider optimization algorithm: modifications, applications, and perspectives. Math Prob Eng. 2018;2018:1–29. doi: 10.1155/2018/6843923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou F, Chen D, Xu Q. A survey of teaching–learning-based optimization. Neurocomputing. 2019;335:366–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim FA, Hussain K, Houssein EH, et al. Archimedes optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Appl Intell. 2021;51(3):1531–51. doi: 10.1007/s10489-020-01893-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorigo M, Socha K. An introduction to ant colony optimization. In: Handbook of approximation algorithms and Metaheuristics. Second ed. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2018. pp. 395–408.
   Google Scholar
• Akhtar A Evolution of Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm–A Brief Literature Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08007. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamadwasel NB. Rider optimization algorithm implemented on the AVR Control System using MATLAB with FOPID. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020;928(3):032017. IOP Publishing. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/928/3/032017
   Google Scholar
• Ashraf H, Abdellatif SO, Elkholy MM, et al. Honey badger optimizer for extracting the ungiven parameters of PEMFC model: steady-state assessment. Energy Convers Manag. 2022;258:115521. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meraihi Y, Gabis AB, Mirjalili S, et al. Grasshopper optimization algorithm: theory, variants, and applications. IEEE Access. 2021;9:50001–50024. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3067597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan RA, Sabir B, Sarwar A, et al. Reptile search algorithm (RSA)-based selective harmonic elimination technique in packed E-Cell (PEC-9) inverter. Processes. 2022;10(8):1615. doi: 10.3390/pr10081615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh A, Neerudi B, Heredia-Negron F. A MACHINE LEARNING-BASED APPROACH TO EPILEPTIC SEIZURE PREDICTION USING ELECTRO-ENCEPHALOGRAPHIC SIGNALS. J Eng Res. 2022;2(8). doi: 10.22533/at.ed.317282219056
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty R, Suman S, Chatterjee D Comparison Analysis of THD Optimization Using PSO and jaya algorithm in reduced H-bridge multi-level inverter. In: Advances in Thermofluids and Renewable Energy: Select Proceedings of TFRE 2020. Springer Singapore; 2022. p. 683–696.
   Google Scholar
• Salman M, Haq IU, Ahmad T, et al. Minimization of total harmonic distortions of cascaded H-bridge multi-level inverter by utilizing bio inspired AI algorithm. EURASIP J Wireless Communicat Network. 2020;2020(1):1–2. doi: 10.1186/s13638-020-01686-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azad A, Kumar J THD minimisation in 15-level hybrid multi-level inverter using harmonic minimization technique. In: 2018 2nd IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems (ICPEICES); Delhi, India. 2018. p. 398–402.
   Google Scholar
• Mali S, Patil BG. THD minimization in multi-level inverter using optimization approach. Int Res J Eng Technol (IJERT). 2018;7(6):97–100.
   Google Scholar
• Palanisamy R, Govindaraj V, Siddhan S, et al. Experimental investigation and comparative harmonic optimization of AMLI incorporate modified genetic algorithm using for power quality improvement. J Int Fuzzy Syst. 2022;43(1):1–4. doi: 10.3233/JIFS-212668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussan MR, Sarwar MI, Sarwar A, et al. Aquila optimization based harmonic elimination in a modified H-Bridge inverter. Sustainability. 2022;14(2):929. doi: 10.3390/su14020929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhavani M, Manoharan PS. A novel 21 level switched capacitor modular multi-level inverter using gray wolf optimization. J Electric Eng Technol. 2022;17(1):283–294. doi: 10.1007/s42835-021-00857-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran U, Kumarasamy S, Samikannu R, et al. Tournament selected glowworm swarm optimization based measurement of selective harmonic elimination in multi-level inverter for enhancing output voltage and Current. Math Prob Eng. 2022;2022:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2022/5845249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda KP, Panda G. Application of swarm optimization-based modified algorithm for selective harmonic elimination in reduced switch count multi-level inverter. IET Power Electron. 2018;11(8):1472–1482. doi: 10.1049/iet-pel.2017.0697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singla D, Sharma PR Power loss analysis in multi-level inverters using multi-objective optimization. In: 2018 2nd IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems (ICPEICES); Delhi, India. 2018. p. 365–369.
   Google Scholar
• Mahesh A, Sandhu KS. Evolutionary algorithm based optimal angle strategy for a cascade h-bridge inverter. Procedia Comput Sci. 2018;125:412–9. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.054
   Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour M, Mansoori S, Shayeghi H. Selective harmonics elimination technique in cascaded h-bridge multi-level inverters using the salp swarm optimization algorithm. J Oper Autom Power Eng. 2020;8(1):32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Omar R, Rasheed M, Sulaiman M A single phase of modified multi-level inverter using particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS); Selangor, Malaysia. 2019. p. 91–95.
   Google Scholar
• Swamy SM, Beno MM. Effective utilization of cascade H-bridge multi-level inverter integrate social spider optimization for reduced total harmonics distortion. Int J Manuf Technol Manage. 2019;33(1–2):1–3. doi: 10.1504/IJMTM.2019.100156
   Google Scholar
• Darvish Falehi A. Optimal harmonic mitigation strategy based on multi-objective whale optimization algorithm for asymmetrical half-cascaded multi-level inverter. Electr Eng. 2020;102(3):1639–1650. doi: 10.1007/s00202-020-00983-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceylan O. Multi-verse optimization algorithm-and salp swarm optimization algorithm-based optimization of multi-level inverters. Neural Comput Appl. 2021;33(6):1935–1950. doi: 10.1007/s00521-020-05062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli A, Mirzaei F, Tashakori S. A new optimal operation structure for renewable-based microgrid operation based on teaching learning based optimization algorithm. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Olamaei J, Karimi M. Total harmonic distortion minimization in multi-level inverters using the teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm. Int J Ambient Energy. 2018;39(3):264–269. doi: 10.1080/01430750.2017.1298057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghdar K. Optimal DC source influence on selective harmonic elimination in multi-level inverters using teaching–learning-based optimization. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2019;67(2):942–949. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2901657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radmanesh H, Kavoosi A Novel multi-level inverter switching technique based on harmony search algorithm. In: 2020 11th Power Electronics, Drive Systems, and Technologies Conference (PEDSTC); Tehran, Iran. IEEE; 2020. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad S. Electromagnetic field optimization based selective harmonic elimination in a cascaded symmetric H-Bridge inverter. Energies. 2022;15(20):7682. doi: 10.3390/en15207682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooqui SA, Shees MM, Alsharekh MF, et al. Crystal structure algorithm (CryStal) based selective harmonic elimination modulation in a cascaded H-Bridge multi-level inverter. Electronics. 2021;10(24):3070. doi: 10.3390/electronics10243070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar SS, Iruthayarajan MW, Sivakumar T. Evolutionary algorithm based selective harmonic elimination for three-phase cascaded H-bridge multi-level inverters with optimized input sources. J Power Electron. 2020;20:1172–1183. doi: 10.1007/s43236-020-00112-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil SD, Kadwane SG. Hybrid optimization algorithm applied for selective harmonic elimination in multi-level inverter with reduced switch topology. Microsyst Technol. 2018;24:3409–3415. doi: 10.1007/s00542-018-3720-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arani AA, Karami H, Vahidi B, et al. Improved hyper-spherical search algorithm for voltage total harmonic distortion minimization in 27-level inverter. J Cent South Univ. 2019;26(10):2822–2832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbie E, Peretz MM, Kuperman A, et al. Analytical approach to THD formulation and optimization in Sine-PWM-based Single-Phase Multi-level Inverters with variable DC ratios. IEEE J Emerg Sel Topics Power Electron. 2022;11(3):2755–2766. doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2022.3220576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran R, Karthikeyan C. Non-linear transformational optimization (NTO) technique based total harmonics distortion (THD) reduction of line to line voltage for multi-level inverters. Microprocess Microsyst. 2020;74:102998. doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2020.102998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy AK, Narayana KV. Optimal total harmonic distortion minimization in multi-level inverter using improved whale optimization algorithm. Int J Emerg Electr Power Syst. 2020;21(3). doi: 10.1515/ijeeps-2020-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekhandji FZ, Kassah MT, Bensalah A. Harmonic reduction and elimination in three phase PWM inverters using a spiral-inspired optimization technique. Alger J Eng Technol. 2020;6(3).
   Google Scholar
• Ravikumar S, Vennila H, Deepak R. Hybrid power generation system with total harmonic distortion minimization using improved rider optimization algorithm: analysis on converters. J Power Sources. 2020;459:228025. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty R, Chatterjee D, Suman S. Honey badger optimization based grid interactive asymmetrical cascaded MLI with minimum voltage distortion. Evolving Syst. 2023;1–3. doi: 10.1007/s12530-023-09493-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew WT, Yong WV, Ong SL, et al. Harmonics minimization in MLI using grasshopper optimization algorithm. International Journal Of Electronics. 2022;109(6):1009–34. doi: 10.1080/00207217.2021.1966660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui NI, Alam A, Quayyoom L, et al. Artificial jellyfish search algorithm-based selective harmonic elimination in a cascaded H-bridge multi-level inverter. Electronics. 2021;10(19):2402. doi: 10.3390/electronics10192402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu N, Londhe ND. Optimization based selective harmonic elimination in multi-level inverters. In: 2017 National Power Electronics Conference (NPEC). IEEE; 2017. p. 325–329.
   Google Scholar