Power estimation for testing normal means

References

• Hoening , J. M. and Heisey , D. M. 2001 . The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculation for data analysis . Am. Statist. , 55 : 19 – 24 .
   Google Scholar
• Lenth , R. V. 2001 . Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination . Am. Statist. , 55 : 187 – 193 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillett , R. 1996 . Retrospective power surveys . The Statistician , 45 : 231 – 236 .
   Google Scholar
• Berger , J. O. and Sellke , T. 1987 . Testing a point null hypothesis: The irreconcilability of p-values and evidence . J. Am. Statist. Assoc. , 82 : 112 – 122 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger , J. O. and Delampady , M. 1987 . Testing precise hypothesis (with discussion) . Statist. Sci. , 2 : 317 – 352 .
   Google Scholar
• Casella , G. and Berger , R. L. 1987 . Reconciling Bayesian and Frequentist evidence in the one-sided testing problem . J. Am. Statist. Assoc. , 82 : 106 – 111 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang , J. T.G. , Casella , G. , Robert , C. , Wells , M. and Farrel , R. 1992 . Estimation of accuracy in testing . Ann. Statist. , 20 : 490 – 509 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh , H. S. and DasGupta , A. 1999 . Comparison of the p-value and posterior probability . J Statist. Plann. Inference , 76 : 93 – 107 .
   Google Scholar
• Sellke , T. , Bayarri , M. J. and Berger , J. O. 2001 . Calibration of p-values for testing point null hypotheses . Am. Statist. , 55 : 62 – 71 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao , C. A. 2006 . Assessing post-data weight of evidence . J. Statist. Plann. Inference , 136 : 4012 – 4025 .
   Google Scholar
• Berger , J. O. 1984 . “ The robust Bayesian viewpoint ” . In Robustness of Bayesian Analyses , Edited by: Kadane , J. B. 63 – 124 . New York : Elsevier Science Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Berger , J. O. 1994 . An overview of robust Bayesian analysis . Test , 3 : 5 – 124 .
   Google Scholar
• Dalal , S. R. and Hall , W. J. 1983 . Approximating priors by mixtures of natural conjugate priors . J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B , 45 : 272 – 286 .
   Google Scholar
• Diaconis , P. and Ylvisaker , D. 1985 . “ Quantifying prior opinion ” . In Bayesian Statistics 2 , Edited by: Bernardo , J. M. , Degroot , M. H. , Lindley , D. V. and Smith , A. F.M. 133 – 156 . Amsterdam : North-Holland . (with discussion)
   Google Scholar
• S. Petrone and P. Veronese, Nonparametric mixture priors based on an exponential random scheme, Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economià, Universta dell'Insubria, 2001. Available at http://eco.uninsubria.it/dipeco/Quaderni/y2001.htm
   Google Scholar
• Casella , G. and Berger , R. L. 2002 . Statistical Inference , 2 , Pacific Grove, CA, , USA : Duxbury-Wadsworth Group .
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence , M. J. 1975 . Inequalities of s-ordered distributions . Ann. Statist. , 1 : 413 – 428 .
   Google Scholar
• Tsai , C. C. and Tsao , C. A. 2009 . Post-data estimation of binomial testing power . Taiwanese J. Math. , To appear
   Google Scholar
• Royall , R. M. 1997 . Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm , Melbourne : Chapman and Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay , P. S. 2007 . “ Why Bayesianism?: A primer on a probabilistic philosophy of science ” . In Bayesian Statistics and its Applications , Edited by: Upadhyay , S. K. , Sing , U. and Dey , D. K. 42 – 62 . New Delhi : Anamaya Publishing Company .
   Google Scholar
• Tsao , C. A. 2006 . A note on Lindley's paradox . Test , 15 : 125 – 139 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar