Plug-in L₂-upper error bounds in deconvolution, for a mixing density estimate in R^d and for its derivatives, via the L₁-error for the mixture

References

• Devroye L. A note on the usefulness of superkernels in density estimation. Ann Statist. 1992;20:2037–2056. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176348901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comte F, Lacour C. Anisotropic adaptive kernel deconvolution. Ann Inst H Poincaré Probab Statist. 2013;49:569–609. doi: 10.1214/11-AIHP470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepski OV, Willer T. Lower bounds in the convolution structure density model. Bernoulli. 2017;23:884–926. doi: 10.3150/15-BEJ763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebelles G, Structural adaptive deconvolution under Lp-losses. arXiv:1504.06246v2.2015.
   Google Scholar
• Fan J. Adaptive local one-dimensional sub-problems with application to a deconvolution problem. Ann Statist. 1993;21:600–610. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176349139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan J. Deconvolution with supersmooth distributions. Can J Stat. 1992;20(2):155–169. doi: 10.2307/3315465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan J. On the optimal rates of convergence for nonparametric deconvolution problems. Ann Statist. 1991;19:1257–1272. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176348248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall P, Meister A. A ridge-parameter approach to deconvolution. Ann Stat. 2007;35:1535–1558. doi: 10.1214/009053607000000028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister A. Deconvolution problems in nonparametric statistics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2009. (Lecture notes in statistics; 193).
   Google Scholar
• Lounici K, Nickl R. Global uniform risk bound for wavelet deconvolution estimators. Ann Statist. 2011;39:201–231. doi: 10.1214/10-AOS836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masry E. Multivariate probability density deconvolution for stationary random processes. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 1991;37:1105–1115. doi: 10.1109/18.87002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youndjé E, Wells MT. Optimal bandwidth selection for multivariate kernel deconvolution density estimation. TEST. 2008;17:138–162. doi: 10.1007/s11749-006-0027-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrol RJ, Hall P. Optimal rates of convergence for deconvolving a density. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83:1184–1186. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devroye L. Consistent deconvolution in density estimation. Can J Stat. 1989;17:235–239. doi: 10.2307/3314852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse CH. Deconvolving a density from partially contaminated observations. J Multivariate Anal. 1995;55:246–260. doi: 10.1006/jmva.1995.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh W- L, Zhang C-H. Global properties of kernel estimators for mixing densities in exponential family models for discrete variables. Stat Sin. 1996;6:561–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh W- L, Zhang C-H. Estimating mixing densities in exponential family models for discrete variables. Scand J Stat. 1997;24:15–32. doi: 10.1111/1467-9469.00046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pensky M, Vidakovic B. Adaptive wavelet estimator for nonparametric density deconvolution. Ann Stat. 1999;27:2033–2053. doi: 10.1214/aos/1017939249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanski LA, Carroll RJ. Deconvoluting kernel density estimators. Statistics. 1990;21:169–184. doi: 10.1080/02331889008802238
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C-H. Fourier methods for estimating mixing densities and distributions. Ann Stat. 1990;18:806–831. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176347627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butucea C, Tsybakov AB. Sharp optimality in density deconvolution with dominating bias. I, II. Theory Probab Appl. 2007;52(24–39):237–249.
   Google Scholar
• Delaigle A, Gijbels I. Estimation of integrated squared density derivatives from a contaminated sample. J Royal Stat Soc B. 2002;64:869–886. doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00366
   Google Scholar
• Groeneboom P, Jongbloed G. Density estimation in the uniform deconvolution model. Statist Nederlandica. 2003;57:136–157. doi: 10.1111/1467-9574.00225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister A. Density estimation with normal measurement error with unknown variance. Stat Sin. 2006;16:195–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannes J. Deconvolution with unknown error distribution. Ann Stat. 2009;37:2301–2323. doi: 10.1214/08-AOS652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister A. Deconvolution from Fourrier-oscillating error densities under decay and smoothness restrictions. Inverse Probl. 2008;24(1):015003. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/24/1/015003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devroye L, Personal communication. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Karlin S. Total positivity vol. I. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Karlin S. Total positivity, absorption probabilities and applications. Trans Am Math Soc. 1964;111:33–107. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1964-0168010-2
   Google Scholar
• Hoeffding W, Wolfowitz J. Distinguishability of sets of distributions. Ann Math Statist. 1958;29:700–718. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177706531
   Google Scholar
• Yatracos YG. A note on L1 consistent estimation. Can J Stat. 1988;16:283–292. doi: 10.2307/3314734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapnik VN, Chervonenkis AY. On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities. Theory Probab Appl. 1971;16:264–280. doi: 10.1137/1116025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibragimov IA, Khasminski RZ. More on estimation of the density of a distribution. Zap Nauchn Sem Leningrad Otdel Mat Inst Steklov (LOMI). 1981;108:72–88. (in Russian)
   Google Scholar
• Goldenshluger A, Lepski OV. On adaptive minimax density estimation on Rd. Probab Theory Related Fields. 2014;159:479–543. doi: 10.1007/s00440-013-0512-1
   Google Scholar
• Yatracos YG. Rates of convergence of minimum distance estimators and Kolmogorov's entropy. Ann Statist. 1985;13:768–774. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176349553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussas GG, Yatracos YG, Minimum distance estimates with rates under φ-mixing. In: Pollard D, Torgersen E, Yang GL, editors. Festschrift for Lucien Le Cam: research Papers in probability and statistics. New York (NY): Springer; 1997. p. 337–345.
   Google Scholar
• Roussas GG, Yatracos YG. Minimum distance regression-type estimates with rates under weak dependence. Ann Inst Stat Math. 1996;48(2):267–281. doi: 10.1007/BF00054790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genovese CR, Wasserman L. Rates of convergence for the Gaussian mixture sieve. Ann Stat. 2000;28:1105–1127. doi: 10.1214/aos/1015956709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosal S, van der Vaart AW. Entropy and rates of convergence for maximum likelihood and Bayes estimation for mixtures of normal densities. Ann Stat. 2001;29:1233–1263. doi: 10.1214/aos/1013203453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C-H. Generalized maximum likelihood estimation of normal mixture densities. Stat Sin. 2009;19:1297–1318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibragimov IA. Estimation of analytic functions. Hayward (CA): IMS; 2001. (State of the art in probability and statistics. Festschrift for W. R. van Zwet.
   Google Scholar
• Lorentz GG. Approximation of functions. New York (NY): Chelsea Publishing Company; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Yatracos YG. On the estimation of the derivatives of a function with the derivatives of an estimate. J Multivariate Anal. 1989;28:172–175. doi: 10.1016/0047-259X(89)90102-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar