Inference of dependent left-truncated and right-censored competing risks data from a general bivariate class of inverse exponentiated distributions

References

• Balakrishnan N, So H, Ling M. EM algorithm for one-shot device testing with competing risks under exponential distribution. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2015;137:129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chacko M, Mohan R. Bayesian analysis of Weibull distribution based on progressive type-II censored competing risks data with binomial removals. Comput Stat. 2019;34:233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koley A, Kundu D. On generalized progressive hybrid censoring in presence of competing risks. Metrika. 2017;80:401–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L. Inference of progressively censored competing risks data from Kumaraswamy distributions. J Comput Appl Math. 2018;343:719–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu SJ, Huang SR. Planning two or more level constant-stress accelerated life tests with competing risks. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2017;158:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan Q, Tang Y, Xu A. Objective Bayesian analysis for competing risks model with wiener degradation phenomena and catastrophic failures. Appl Math Model. 2019;74:422–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu A, Tang Y. Nonparametric Bayesian analysis of competing risks problem with masked data. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2011;40(13):2326–2336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida MP, Paixao RS, Ramos P, et al. Bayesian non-parametric frailty model for dependent competing risks in a repairable systems framework. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2020;204:107145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hove H, Beichelt F, Kapur PK. Estimation of the Frank copula model for dependent competing risks in accelerated life testing. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. 2017;8:673–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu M, Shi Y, Zhang C. Statistical analysis of dependent competing risks model in accelerated life testing under progressively hybrid censoring using copula function. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2017;46(5):4004–4017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YC, Emura T, Fan TH, et al. Likelihood-based inference for a frailty-copula model based on competing risks failure time data. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2020;36(5):1622–1638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo C, Shen L, Xu A. Modelling and estimation of system reliability under dynamic operating environments and lifetime ordering constraints. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2022;218:108136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall AW, Olkin I. A multivariate exponential distribution. J Am Stat Assoc. 1967;62:30–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feizjavadian SH, Hashemi R. Analysis of dependent competing risks in the presence of progressive hybrid censoring using Marshall–Olkin bivariate Weibull distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2015;82:19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu D, Gupta AK. Bayes estimation for the Marshall–Olkin bivariate Weibull distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2013;57:271–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu D, Gupta RD. Bivariate generalized exponential distribution. J Multivar Anal. 2009;100(4):581–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Tripathi YM, Dey S, et al. Inference for dependence competing risks with partially observed failure causes from bivariate Gompertz distribution under generalized progressive hybrid censoring. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2020;37(3):1150–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu AC, Zhou S. Bayesian analysis of series system with dependent causes of failure. Stat Theory Relat Fields. 2017;1(1):128–140.
   Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Xu A. On the dependent competing risks using Marshall–Olkin bivariate Weibull model: parameter estimation with different methods. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2018;47(22):5558–5572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang YT, Wang CC. A goodness of fit test for left-truncated and right-censored data. Stat Prob Lett. 2008;78:2420–2425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo X, Tsai WY. Nonparametric estimation for right-censored length-biased data: a pseudo-partial likelihood approach. Biometrika. 2009;96:873–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong YL, Meeker WQ, McCalley JD. Prediction of remaining life of power transformers based on left truncated and right censored lifetime data. Ann Appl Stat. 2009;3:857–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde J. Testing survival under right censoring and left truncation. Biometrika. 1977;64:225–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Mitra D. Likelihood inference for lognormal data with left truncation and right censoring with an illustration. J Stat Plann Inference. 2011;141:3536–3553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Mitra D. Left truncated and right censored Weibull data and likelihood inference with an illustration. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2012;56:4011–4025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Mitra D. Likelihood inference based on left truncated and right censored data from a Gamma distribution. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2013;62:679–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Yi GY. Semiparametric methods for left-truncated and right-censored survival data with covariate measurement error. Ann Inst Stat Math. 2021;73:481–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Ye Z, Zhao X. Reliability estimation from left-truncated and right-censored data using splines. Stat Sinica. 2020;30:845–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu D, Mitra D. Bayesian inference of Weibull distribution based on left truncated and right censored data. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2016;99:38–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra D, Balakrishnan N. Statistical inference based on left truncated and interval censored data from log-location-scale family of distributions. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2021;50(4):1073–1093.
   Google Scholar
• Ranjan R, Sen R, Upadhyay SK. Bayes analysis of some important lifetime models using MCMC based approaches when the observations are left truncated and right censored. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2021;214:107747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang X, Ng HKT. On parameter estimation for the generalized gamma distribution based on left-truncated and right-censored data. Comput Math Methods. 2021;3(1):e1091.
   Google Scholar
• Ghitany ME, Tuan VK, Balakrishnan N. Likelihood estimation for a general class of inverse exponentiated distributions based on complete and progressively censored data. J Stat Comput Simul. 2014;84(1):96–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey S, Dey T, Luckett DJ. Statistical inference for the generalized inverted exponential distribution based on upper record values. Math Comput Simul. 2016;120:64–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilaslan F. Classical and Bayesian estimation of reliability in a multicomponent stress-strength model based on a general class of inverse exponentiated distributions. Stat Pap. 2018;59(3):1161–1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodhi C, Tripathi YM, Wang L. Inference for a general family of inverted exponentiated distributions with partially observed competing risks under generalized progressive hybrid censoring. J Stat Comput Simul. 2021;91(12):2503–2526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barndorff-Nielsen OE, Cox DR. Inference and asymptotics. London: Chapman & Hall; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Pena EA, Gupta AK. Bayes estimation for the Marshall–Olkin exponential distribution. J R Stat Soc B. 1990;52:379–389.
   Google Scholar
• Metropolis N, Rosenbluth A, Rosenbluth M, et al. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys. 1953;21:1087–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings WK. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika. 1970;57:97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geman S, Geman D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1984;6:721–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu D, Mitra D, Ganguly A. Analysis of left truncated and right censored competing risks data. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2017;108:12–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar