The risk of tensor Stein-rules in elliptically contoured distributions

References

• Li L, Zhang X. Parsimonious tensor response regression. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2017;112(519):1131–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li L. Tensor envelope partial least-squares regression. Technometrics. 2017;59(4):426–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arashi M. Some theoretical results on tensor elliptical distribution; preprint 2017. Available from: arXiv:1709.00801.
   Google Scholar
• Arashi M, Saleh AKME, Tabatabaey SMM. Regression model with elliptically contoured errors. Statistics. 2013;47(6):1266–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkurunziza S. The risk of pretest and shrinkage estimators. Statistics. 2012;46(3):305–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkurunziza S. The bias and risk functions of some stein-rules in elliptically contoured distributions. Math Methods Stat. 2013;22(1):70–82.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh AKME. Theory of preliminary test and Stein-type estimation with applications. Vol. 517. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Chen F, Nkurunziza S. Optimal method in multiple regression with structural changes. Bernoulli. 2015;21(4):2217–2241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F, Nkurunziza S. A class of stein-rules in multivariate regression model with structural changes. Scand J Stat. 2016;43(1):83–102. DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain S, Ahmed SE, Grace YY, et al. Shrinkage and pretest estimators for longitudinal data analysis under partially linear models. J Nonparametr Stat. 2016;28(3):531–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu G, Yu S, Luo H. Comparisons of variance estimators in a misspecified linear model with elliptically contoured errors. J Multivar Anal. 2015;133:266–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng P, Hu G, Ding M. Comparisons of estimators for regression coefficient in a misspecified linear model with elliptically contoured errors. J Korean Stat Soc. 2016;45:477–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen PK, E. Saleh AKM. On some shrinkage estimators of multivariate location. Ann Stat. 1985;13:272–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raheem SME, Ahmed SE, Doksum K. Absolute penalty and shrinkage estimation in partially linear models. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2012;56(4):874–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman E, Landsman Z. Tail variance premium with applications for elliptical portfolio of risks. ASTIN Bull J IAA. 2006;36(2):433–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsman ZM, Valdez EA. Tail conditional expectations for elliptical distributions. N Am Actuar J. 2003;7(4):55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Liu JS, Ip WC, Wong H. Predictive inference for singular multivariate elliptically contoured distributions. J Multivar Anal. 2009;100(7):1440–1446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham NH, Kiesel R, et al. Semi-parametric modelling in finance: theoretical foundations. Quant Finance. 2002;2(4):241–250.
   Google Scholar
• Judge GG, Bock ME. The statistical implications of pre-test and Stein-rule estimators in econometrics. Vol. 25. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co.; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Kolda TG, Bader BW. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM Rev. 2009;51(3):455–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu KC. Estimation and decision for linear systems with elliptical random processes. IEEE Trans Autom Cont, AC. 1973;18:499–505.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Varga T. Normal mixture representations of matrix variate elliptically contoured distributions. Sankhyā. 1995;57(1):68–78.
   Google Scholar
• Batsidis A, Zografos K. Statistical inference for location and scale of elliptically contoured models with monotone missing data. J Stat Plan Inference. 2006;136(8):2606–2629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batsidis A. Robustness of the likelihood ratio test for detection and estimation of a mean change point in a sequence of elliptically contoured observations. Statistics. 2010;44(1):17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffer FW, Park C. A test for elliptical symmetry. J Multivar Anal. 2007;98(2):256–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Fang K-T, Hickernell FJ. Some necessary uniform tests for spherical symmetry. Ann Inst Stat Math. 2008;60(3):679–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakhanenko L. Testing for ellipsoidal symmetry: A comparison study. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2008;53(2):565–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izenman AJ. Modern multivariate statistical techniques. Regress Classif Manifold Learn. 2008;10:168.
   Google Scholar
• Nkurunziza S, Ahmed SE. Shrinkage drift parameter estimation for multi-factor ornstein-uhlenbeck processes. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind. 2010;26(2):103–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia JAD. Singular matrix variate skew-elliptical distribution and the distribution of general linear transformation. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ghannam M, Nkurunziza S. Improved estimation in tensor regression with multiple change-points. 2020. Submitted.
   Google Scholar
• Bellec P, Chu C, Chouinard-Decorte F, et al. The neuro bureau adhd-200 preprocessed repository. NeuroImage. 2017;144:275–286. ISSN 1053-8119. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381191630283X. Data Sharing Part II. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solanto MV, Schulz KP, Fan J, et al. Event-related fmri of inhibitory control in the predominantly inattentive and combined subtypes of adhd. J Neuroimaging. 2009;19(3):205–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf RC, Plichta MM, Sambataro F, et al. Regional brain activation changes and abnormal functional connectivity of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex during working memory processing in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(7):2252–2266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu-Feng Z, Yong H, Chao-Zhe Z, et al. Altered baseline brain activity in children with adhd revealed by resting-state functional mri. Brain Develop. 2007;29(2):83–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar