U-Statistics for left truncated and right censored data

References

• Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Michimae H, Emura T. Likelihood inference for copula models based on left-truncated and competing risks data from field studies. Mathematics. 2022;10:2163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Meeker WQ, McCalley JD. Prediction of remaining life of power transformers based on left truncated and right censored lifetime data. Ann Appl Stat. 2009;3:857–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Mitra D. Likelihood inference for lognormal data with left truncation and right censoring with an illustration. J Stat Plan Inference. 2011;141:3536–3553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Mitra D. Left truncated and right censored Weibull data and likelihood inference with an illustration. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2012;56:4011–4025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Mitra D. Some further issues concerning likelihood inference for left truncated and right censored lognormal data. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2014;43:400–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu D, Mitra D, Ganguly A. Analysis of left truncated and right censored competing risks data. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2017;108:12–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaieb LL, Rivest LP, Abdous B. Estimating survival under a dependent truncation. Biometrika. 2006;93:655–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emura T, Murotani K. An algorithm for estimating survival under a copula-based dependent truncation model. Test. 2015;24:734–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emura T, Pan CH. Parametric likelihood inference and goodness-of-fit for dependently left-truncated data, a copula-based approach. Stat Papers. 2020;61:479–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakulenko-Lagun B, Qian J, Chiou SH, et al. Nonparametric estimation of the survival distribution under covariate-induced dependent truncation. Biometrics. 2022;78:1390–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegherr R, Allignol A, Meister R, et al. Estimating cumulative incidence functions in competing risks data with dependent left-truncation. Stat Med. 2020;39:481–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Fine JP, Chappell R. Semiparametric analysis of survival data with left truncation and dependent right censoring. Biometrics. 2005;61:567–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geskus RB. Cause-specific cumulative incidence estimation and the fine and gray model under both left truncation and right censoring. Biometrics. 2011;67:39–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhang MJ, Fine J. A proportional hazards regression model for the subdistribution with right censored and left truncated competing risks data. Stat Med. 2011;30:1933–1951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su YR, Wang JL. Modeling left-truncated and right-censored survival data with longitudinal covariates. Ann Stat. 2012;40:1465–1488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakulenko-Lagun B, Mandel M. Comparing estimation approaches for the illness-death model under left truncation and right censoring. Stat Med. 2016;35:1533–1548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortese G, Holmboe SA, Scheike TH. Regression models for the restricted residual mean life for right censored and left truncated data. Stat Med. 2017;36:1803–1822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CM, Shen PS, Wei JCC, et al. A semiparametric mixture cure survival model for left truncated and right censored data. Biom J. 2017;59:270–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CM, Shen PS. Conditional maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric transformation model with LTRC data. Lifetime Data Anal. 2018;24:250–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efromovich S, Chu J. Hazard rate estimation for left truncated and right censored data. Ann Inst Stat Math. 2018;70:889–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou J, Chambers CD, Xu R. A nonparametric maximum likelihood approach for survival data with observed cured subjects, left truncation and right-censoring. Lifetime Data Anal. 2018;24:612–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Ye Z, Zhao X. Reliability estimation from left-truncated and right-censored data using splines. Stat Sin. 2020;30:845–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen LP, Yi GY. Semiparametric methods for left-truncated and right-censored survival data with covariate measurement error. Ann Inst Stat Math. 2021;73:481–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emura T, Michimae H. Left-truncated and right-censored field failure data: review of parametric analysis for reliability. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2022;38:3919–3934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee AJ. U-Statistics: theory and practice. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski J, Xin MT. Modern applied U-statisticsNew Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Jing BY, Yuan J, Zhou W. Jackknife empirical likelihood. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2009;104:1224–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta S, Bandyopadhyay D, Satten GA. Inverse probability of censoring weighted U-statistics for right censored data with an application to testing hypotheses. Scand J Stat. 2010;37:680–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satten GA, Kong M, Datta S. Multisample adjusted U-statistics that account for confounding covariates. Stat Med. 2018;37:3357–3372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Datta S. Adjustments of multi-sample U-statistics to right censored data and confounding covariates. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2019;135:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen PK, Borgan O, Gill RD, et al. Statistical models based on counting processes. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Weißbach R, Dörre A. Retrospective sampling of survival data based on a poisson birth process: conditional maximum likelihood. Statistics. 2022;56:844–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich S, Beyersmann J, Winterfeld U, et al. Nonparametric estimation of pregnancy outcome probabilities. Ann Appl Stat. 2017;11:840–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann EL. Consistency and unbiasedness of certain nonparametric tests. Ann Math Stat. 1951;22:165–179.
   Google Scholar
• Tsiatis A. A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1975;72:20–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless JF. Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Crowder MJ. Multivariate survival analysis and competing risks. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Dewan I, Deshpande J, Kulathinal S. On testing dependence between time to failure and cause of failure via conditional probabilities. Scand J Stat. 2004;31:79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anjana S, Dewan I, Sudheesh KK. Test for independence between time to failure and cause of failure in competing risks with k causes of failure. J Nonparametr Stat. 2019;31:322–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewan I, Kulathinal S. On testing dependence between time to failure and cause of failure when causes of failure are missing. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:1255–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J. The statistical analysis of interval-censored failure time data. Springer: New York; 2006.
   Google Scholar