A new approach to estimate parameters of the two-parameter Weibull distribution

References

• Fernández AJ. Weibull inference using trimmed samples and prior information. Stat Pap. 2009;50:119–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández AJ. Tolerance limits and sample-size determination using Weibull trimmed data. Axioms. 2023;12(4):351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman G. Reliability verification, testing, and analysis in engineering design. New York: CRC Press; 2002. p. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Evans J, Kretschmann D, Green D (2019) Procedures for estimation of Weibull parameters. General Technical Report. FPL-GTR-264. Madison, WI: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory
   Google Scholar
• Thoman DR, Bain LJ, Antle CE. Inferences on the parameters of the Weibull distribution. Technometrics. 1969;11(3):445–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Cohen AC. Order statistics and inference. Boston: Academic Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg RV, McKean J, Craig AT. Introduction to mathematical statistics. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Yu K, Wang BX, Patilea V. New estimating equation approaches with application in lifetime data analysis. Ann Inst Stat Math. 2013;65(3):589–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter HL, Moore AH. Maximum-likelihood estimation of the parameters of gamma and Weibull populations from complete and from censored samples. Technometrics. 1965;7(4):639–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons DI, Vance LC. A simulation study of estimators for the 2-parameter Weibull distribution. IEEE Trans Rel. 1981;30(1):61–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen AC, Whitten BJ. Parameter estimation in reliability and life span models. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen AC. Maximum likelihood estimation in the Weibull distribution based on complete and on censored samples. Tecnometrics. 1965;7(4):579–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter HL, Balakrishnan N. CRC handbook of tables for the use of order statistics in estimation. Boca Raton: Crc Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Meeker WO, Escobar LA. Statistical methods for reliability data. New York: Wiley & Sons; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain A, Zimmer W. Comparison of estimation methods for Weibull parameters: complete and censored samples. J Stat Comput Simul. 2003;73(2):145–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders SC. Reliability, life testing and the prediction of service lives: for engineers and scientists. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Kateri M. On the maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of Weibull distribution based on complete and censored data. Stat Probab Lett. 2008;78(17):2971–2975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinne H. The Weibull distribution: a handbook. New York: CRC Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Panahi H, Asadi S. Estimation of the Weibull distribution based on type II censored samples. Appl Math Sci. 2011;5(52):2549–2558.
   Google Scholar
• Teimouri M, Hoseini SM, Nadarajah S. Comparison of estimation methods for the Weibull distribution. Statistics (Ber). 2013;47(1):93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox DR, Snell EJ. A general definition of residuals. J R Stat Soc: B (Methodological). 1968;30(2):248–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Han C. Parameter estimation of Weibull distribution based on second-kind statistics. J Commun Softw Syst. 2010;6(3):109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Newby MJ. The properties of moment estimators for the Weibull distribution based on the sample coefficient of variation. Technometrics. 1980;22(2):187–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard D. The minimum distance method of testing. Metrika. 1980;27(1):43–70.
   Google Scholar
• Luceño A. Fitting the generalized Pareto distribution to data using maximum goodness-of-fit estimators. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2006;51(2):904–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey SD. Some percentile estimators for Weibull parameters. Technometrics. 1967;9(1):119–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seki T, Yokoyama S. Simple and robust estimation of the Weibull parameters. Microelectron Reliab. 1993;33(1):45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadani S, Abdollahnezhad K, Teimouri M, et al. (2019). A new estimator for Weibull distribution parameters: comprehensive comparative study for Weibull Distribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.05658.
   Google Scholar
• Hosking JR. L-moments: analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order statistics. J R Stat Soc: Series B (Methodological). 1990;52(1):105–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HM, Jang YH, Arnold BC, et al. New efficient estimators for the Weibull distribution. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2023;53(1):1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Elamir EA, Seheult AH. Trimmed L-moments. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2003;43(3):299–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bílková D. L-moments and TL-moments as an alternative tool of statistical data analysis. J Appl Math Phys. 2014;2(10):919.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul-Moniem IB. TL-moments and L-moments estimation for the Weibull distribution. Adv Appl Stat. 2009;15(1):83–99.
   Google Scholar
• Sen PK. Introduction to hoeffding (1948) a class of statistics with asymptotically normal distribution. In: Breakthroughs in statistics. Volume I. New York: Springer; 1992. p. 299–307.
   Google Scholar
• Sangpoom S, Klomwises Y. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the modified power function distribution. Trends Sci. 2021;18(19):14–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mazucheli J, Menezes AFB, Nadarajah S. mle.tools: an R Package for Maximum Likelihood Bias Correction. R J. 2017;9(2):268.
   Google Scholar
• Delignette-Muller ML, Dutang C. fitdistrplus: an R package for fitting distributions. J Stat Softw. 2015;64(4):1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teimouri M, Doser JW, Finley AO. ForestFit: an R package for modeling plant size distributions. Environ Model Softw. 2020;131:104668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino RB, Stephens MA. Goodness-of-fit techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Fu T, Chen D, Chen P. Fatigue life analysis of cylindrical helical compression spring based on Weibull distribution. J Mech Strength. 2020;42(1):81–86.
   Google Scholar
• Olteanu D, Freeman L. The evaluation of median-rank regression and maximum likelihood estimation techniques for a two-parameter Weibull distribution. Qual Eng. 2010;22(4):256–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattarai KP. Partial L-moments for the analysis of censored flood samples/Utilisation des L-moments partiels pour l’analyse d’échantillons tronqués de crues. Hydrol Sci J. 2004;49(5):855–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar