Bilevel programming problems with simple convex lower level

References

• Albrecht S, Leibold M, Ulbrich M. A bilevel optimization approach to obtain optimal cost functions for human arm movements. Control Optim. 2012;2:105–127.
   Google Scholar
• Fisch F, Lenz J, Holzapfel F, et al. On the solution of bilevel optimal control problems to increase the fairness of air race. J. Guidance Control Dyn. 2012;35:1292–1298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knauer M, Büskens C, Lasch P. Real-time solution of bi-level optimal control problems. PAMM. 2005;5:749–750.
   Google Scholar
• Knauer M, Büskens C. Hybrid solution methods for bilevel optimal control problems with time dependent coupling. Diehl M, Glineur F, Jarlebring E, et al., editors. Recent advances in optimization and its applications in engineering. Berlin: Springer; 2010. pp. 237–246.
   Google Scholar
• Mombaur K, Truong A, Laumond JP. From human to humanoid locomotion --- an inverse optimal control approach. Auton. Rob. 2010;28:369–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnel H, Morgan J. Optimality conditions for semivectorial bilevel convex optimal control problems. In: Bailey DH, Bauschke HH, Borwein P, et al., editors. Computational and analytical mathematics. Vol. 50, Springer proceedings in mathematics and statistics. New York (NY): Springer; 2013. p. 45–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnel H, Morgan J. Semivectorial bilevel convex optimal control problems: existence results. SIAM J. Control Optim. 2012;50:3224–3241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye JJ. Optimal strategies for bilevel dynamic problems. SIAM J. Optim. Control. 1997;35:512–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benita F, Dempe S, Mehlitz P. Bilevel optimal control problems with pure state constraints and finite-dimensional lower level. Freiberg: TU Bergakademie Freiberg. Fourthcoming 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Benita F, Mehlitz P. Bilevel optimal control with final-state-dependent finite-dimensional lower level. Freiberg: TU Bergakademie Freiberg. Fourthcoming 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dempe S, Kalashnikov VV, Ríos-Mercado RZ. Discrete bilevel programming: application to a natural gas cash-out problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2005;166:469–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalashnikov VV, Dempe S, Pérez-Valdéz GA, et al. Natural gas cash-out problem: solution with bilevel programming tools. The 2011 New Orleans International Academic Conference. New Orleans: Louisiana, USA; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kalashnikov VV, Pérez-Valdéz GA, Kalashnykova NI. A linearization approach to solve the natural gas bilevel problem. Ann. Oper. Res. 2010;181:423–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalashnikov VV, Ríos-Mercado RZ. A natural gas cash-out problem: a bilevel programming framework and a penalty function method. Optim. Eng. 2006;7:403–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachsmuth G. Mathematical programs with complementarity constraints in Banach spaces. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2015;166:480–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempe S, Mehlitz P. Lipschitz continuity of the optimal value function in parametric optimization. J. Global Optim. 2014;61:363–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordukhovich BS. Variational analysis and generalized differentiation I and II. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mordukhovich BS, Nam NM. Variational stability and marginal functions via generalized differentiation. Math. Oper. Res. 2005;30:800–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordukhovich BS, Nam NM, Yen ND. Subgradients of marginal functions in parametric mathematical programming. Math. Program. 2009;116:369–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempe S. Foundations of bilevel programming. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Dempe S, Dutta J, Mordukhovich BS. New necessary optimality conditions in optimistic bilevel programming. Optimization. 2007;56:577–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye JJ, Zhu DL. Optimality conditions for bilevel programming problems. Optimization. 1995;33:9–27.
   Google Scholar
• Henrion R, Surowiec T. On calmness conditions in convex bilevel programming. Appl. Anal. 2011;90:951–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chieu NH, Kien BT, Toan NT. Further results on subgradients of the value function to a parametric optimal control problem Theory Appl. J. Optim. 2011:1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10957-011-9933-0.
   Google Scholar
• Mordukhovich BS, Nam NM, Yen ND. Fréchet subdifferential calculus and optimality conditions in nondifferentiable programming. Optimization. 2006;55:685–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiacco A, Kyparisis J. Convexity and concavity properties of the optimal value function in nonlinear parametric programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 1986;48:95–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demyanov VF, Rubinov AM. Quasidifferentiability and related topics. New York (NY): Springer; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnans JF, Shapiro A. Perturbation analysis of optimization problems. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kurcyusz S, Zowe J. Regularity and stability for the mathematical programming problem in Banach spaces. Appl. Math. Optim. 1979;5:49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson S. Stability theory for systems of inequalities, Part II: differentiable nonlinear systems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1976;13:497–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner D. Funktionalanalysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Ioffe AD, Tichomirov VM. Theory of extremal problems. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Dempe S, Zemkoho AB. The bilevel programming problem: reformulations, constraint qualications and optimality conditions. Math. Program. 2013;138:447–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn J. Introduction to the theory of nonlinear optimization. Berlin: Springer; 1996.
   Google Scholar