A new robust DEA model and super-efficiency measure

References

• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2(6):429–444.10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 1984;30(9):1078–1092.10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen P, Petersen NC. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 1993;39(10):1261–1264.10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrall RM. Chapter 5 duality, classification and slacks in DEA. Ann Oper Res. 1996;66(2):109–138.10.1007/BF02187297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford LM, Zhu J. Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 1998;108(1):127–139.10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00103-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinuany-Stern Z, Mehrez A, Hadad Y. An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units. Int Trans Oper Res. 2000;7(2):109–124.10.1111/itor.2000.7.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Jablonsky J. Multicriteria approaches for ranking of efficient units in DEA models. CEJOR. 2012;20(3):435–449.10.1007/s10100-011-0223-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soyster AL. Technical note—convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Oper Res. 1973;21(5):1154–1157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A. Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Oper Res Lett. 1999;25(1):1–13.10.1016/S0167-6377(99)00016-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A. Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Math Program. 2000;88(3):411–421.10.1007/PL00011380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, El-Ghaoui L, Nemirovski A. Robust Optimization. Princeton Series in Applied Mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2009.10.1515/9781400831050
   Google Scholar
• El-Ghaoui L, Lebret H. Robust solutions to least-squares problems with uncertain data matrices. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl. 1997;18(4):1035–1064.10.1137/S0895479896298130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Ghaoui L, Oustry F, Lebret H. Robust solutions to uncertain semidefinite programs. SIAM J Optim. 1998;9(1):33–52.10.1137/S1052623496305717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Sim M. The price of robustness. Oper Res. 2004;52(1):35–53.10.1287/opre.1030.0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Wei F. Robust data envelopment analysis based MCDM with the consideration of uncertain data. J Syst Eng Electron. 2010;21(6):981–989.10.3969/j.issn.1004-4132.2010.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadjadi SJ, Omrani H. Data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: an application for Iranian electricity distribution companies. Energy Policy. 2008;36(11):4247–4254.10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadjadi SJ, Omrani H. A bootstrapped robust data envelopment analysis model for efficiency estimating of telecommunication companies in Iran. Telecommun Policy. 2010;34(4):221–232.10.1016/j.telpol.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokouhi AH, Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, et al. Robust optimization approach for imprecise data envelopment analysis. Comput Ind Eng. 2010;59(3):387–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadjadi SJ, Omrani H, Abdollahzadeh S, et al. A robust super-efficiency data envelopment analysis model for ranking of provincial gas companies in Iran. Expert Syst Appl. 2011a;38(9):10875–10881.10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadjadi SJ, Omrani H, Makui A, et al. An interactive robust data envelopment analysis model for determining alternative targets in Iranian electricity distribution companies. Expert Syst Appl. 2011b;38(8):9830–9839.10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omrani H. Common weights data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: a robust optimization approach. Comput Ind Eng. 2013;66(4):1163–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohrehbandian M, Makui A, Alinezhad A. A compromise solution approach for finding common weights in DEA: an improvement to Kao and Hung’s approach. J Oper Res Soc. 2010;61(4):604–610.10.1057/jors.2009.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu CC. Robust data envelopment analysis approaches for evaluating algorithmic performance. Comput Ind Eng. 2015;81(1):78–89.10.1016/j.cie.2014.12.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salahi M, Torabi N, Amiri A. An optimistic robust optimization approach to common set of weights in DEA. Measurement. 2016;93:67–73.10.1016/j.measurement.2016.06.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Short communication: measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1979;3(2):339.10.1016/0377-2217(79)90229-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW. Programming with linear fractional functional. Naval Res Log Q. 1962;9(1):67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Toloo M. An epsilon-free approach for finding the most efficient unit in DEA. Appl Math Model. 2014;38(13):3182–3192.10.1016/j.apm.2013.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao C, Hung HT. Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach. J Oper Res Soc. 2005;56(10):1196–1203.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar