Optimization methods for Dirichlet control problems

References

• Casas E, Raymond JP. Error estimates for the numerical approximation of Dirichlet boundary control for semilinear elliptic equations. SIAM J Control Optim. 2006;45(5):1586–1611. DOI:10.1137/050626600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckelnick K, Günther A, Hinze M. Finite element approximation of Dirichlet boundary control for elliptic PDEs on two- and three-dimensional curved domains. SIAM J Control Optim. 2009;48(4):2798–2819. DOI:10.1137/080735369
   Google Scholar
• Günther A. Structure exploiting Galerkin schemes for optimal control of PDEs with constraints on the involved variables [dissertation]. Universit\"at Hamburg; 2010. Available from: http://ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/volltexte/2010/4926/pdf/PhDThesis\_Guenther.pdf
   Google Scholar
• May S, Rannacher R, Vexler B. Error analysis for a finite element approximation of elliptic Dirichlet boundary control problems. SIAM J Control Optim. 2013;51(3):2585–2611. DOI:10.1137/080735734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos M, Neitzel I. Dirichlet control of elliptic state constrained problems. Comput Optim Appl. 2016;63(3):825–853. DOI:10.1007/s10589-015-9784-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas E, Sokolowski J. Approximation of boundary control problems on curved domains. SIAM J Control Optim. 2010;48(6):3746–3780. DOI:10.1137/090761550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas E, Günther A, Mateos M. A paradox in the approximation of Dirichlet control problems in curved domains. SIAM J Control Optim. 2011;49(5):1998–2007. DOI:10.1137/100794882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel T, Mateos M, Pfefferer J, R\"{o}sch A. On the regularity of the solutions of Dirichlet optimal control problems in polygonal domains. SIAM J Control Optim. 2015;53(6):3620–3641. DOI:10.1137/140994186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong W, Hinze M, Zhou Z. Finite element method and a priori error estimates for Dirichlet boundary control problems governed by parabolic PDEs. J Sci Comput. 2016;66(3):941–967. DOI:10.1007/s10915-015-0051-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Nashed Z, Qi L. Smoothing methods and semismooth methods for nondifferentiable operator equations. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2000;38(4):1200–1216. DOI:10.1137/S0036142999356719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergounioux M, Ito K, Kunisch K. Primal-dual strategy for constrained optimal control problems. SIAM J Control Optim. 1999;37(4):1176–1194. DOI:10.1137/S0363012997328609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergounioux M, Kunisch K. Primal-dual strategy for state-constrained optimal control problems. Comput Optim Appl. 2002;22(2):193–224. DOI:10.1023/A:1015489608037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunisch K, Rösch A. Primal-dual active set strategy for a general class of constrained optimal control problems. SIAM J Optim. 2002;13(2):321–334. DOI:10.1137/S1052623499358008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulbrich M. Semismooth Newton methods for operator equations in function spaces. SIAM J Optim. 2002;13(3):805–842. DOI:10.1137/S1052623400371569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintermüller M, Ito K, Kunisch K. The primal-dual active set strategy as a semismooth Newton method. SIAM J Optim. 2003;13(3):865–888. DOI:10.1137/S1052623401383558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintermüller M, Kunisch K. Feasible and noninterior path-following in constrained minimization with low multiplier regularity. SIAM J Control Optim. 2006;45(4):1198–1221. DOI:10.1137/050637480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas E, Mateos M, Raymond JP. Penalization of Dirichlet optimal control problems. ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var. 2009;15(4):782–809. DOI:10.1051/cocv:2008049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze M, Vierling M. The semi-smooth Newton method for variationally discretized control constrained elliptic optimal control problems; implementation, convergence and globalization. Optim Methods Softw. 2012;27(6):933–950. DOI:10.1080/10556788.2012.676046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze M. A variational discretization concept in control constrained optimization: the linear-quadratic case. Comput Optim Appl. 2005;30(1):45–61. DOI:10.1007/s10589-005-4559-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze M, Pinnau R, Ulbrich M, Ulbrich S. Optimization with PDE constraints. In: Mathematical modelling: theory and applications. Vol. 23. New York (NY): Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gong W, Yan N. Mixed finite element method for Dirichlet boundary control problem governed by elliptic PDEs. SIAM J Control Optim. 2011;49(3):984–1014. DOI:10.1137/100795632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas E, Mateos M, Tröltzsch F. Error estimates for the numerical approximation of boundary semilinear elliptic control problems. Comput Optim Appl. 2005;31(2):193–219. DOI:10.1007/s10589-005-2180-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisvard P. Singularities in boundary value problems. Recherches en mathématiques appliquées [Research in applied mathematics]. Vol. 22. Paris: Masson; Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Jerison D, Kenig C. The inhomogeneous Dirichlet problem in Lipschitz domains. J Funct Anal. 1995;130(1):161–219. DOI:10.1006/jfan.1995.1067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerison DS, Kenig CE. The Neumann problem on Lipschitz domains. Bull Amer Math Soc (NS). 1981;4(2):203–207. DOI:10.1090/S0273-0979-1981-14884-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisvard P. Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains. Monographs and studies in mathematics. Vol. 24, Advanced Publishing Program Boston (MA): Pitman; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg BEJ, Kenig CE. Hardy spaces and the Neumann problem in Lp for Laplace’s equation in Lipschitz domains. Ann Math. 1987;125(3):437–465. DOI:10.2307/1971407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggren M. Approximations of very weak solutions to boundary-value problems. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2004;42(2):860–877. DOI:10.1137/S0036142903382048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel T, Mateos M, Pfefferer J, R\"{o}sch A. Error estimates for Dirichlet control problems in polygonal domains: quasi-uniform meshes. Math Control and Related Fields. 2018;8(1). DOI:10.3934/mcrf.2018010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöberl J, Zulehner W. Symmetric indefinite preconditioners for saddle point problems with applications to PDE-constrained optimization problems. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl. 2007;29(3):752–773. DOI:10.1137/060660977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog R, Sachs E. Preconditioned conjugate gradient method for optimal control problems with control and state constraints. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl. 2010;31(5):2291–2317. DOI:10.1137/090779127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiela A, Ulbrich S. Operator preconditioning for a class of inequality constrained optimal control problems. SIAM J Optim. 2014;24(1):435–466. DOI:10.1137/120877532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel T, Sändig AM, Whiteman JR. Graded mesh refinement and error estimates for finite element solutions of elliptic boundary value problems in non-smooth domains. Math Methods Appl Sci. 1996;19(1):63–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamenski L, Huang W, Xu H. Conditioning of finite element equations with arbitrary anisotropic meshes. Math Comp. 2014;83(289):2187–2211. DOI:10.1090/S0025-5718-2014-02822-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauge M. Problèmes mixtes pour le laplacien dans des domaines polyédraux courbes. C R Acad Sci Paris Sér I Math. 1989;309(8):553–558.
   Google Scholar
• Nečas J. Direct methods in the theory of elliptic equations. Monographs and studies in mathematics. 2nd ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Plaza A. The eight-tetrahedra longest-edge partition and Kuhn triangulations. Comput Math Appl. 2007;54(3):427–433. DOI:10.1016/j.camwa.2007.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke F. Optimization and nonsmooth analysis. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Ito K, Kunisch K. Semi-smooth Newton methods for state-constrained optimal control problems. Syst Control Lett. 2003;50(3):221–228. DOI:10.1016/S0167-6911(03)00156-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar