Six set scalarizations based on the oriented distance: properties and application to set optimization

References

• Araya Y. Four types of nonlinear scalarizations and some applications in set optimization. Nonlinear Anal. 2012;75:3821–3835. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2012.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez C, Jiménez B, Miglierina E, et al. Scalarization in set optimization with solid and nonsolid ordering cones. J Global Optim. 2015;61(3):525–552. doi: 10.1007/s10898-014-0179-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamel A, Löhne A. Minimal element theorems and Ekeland's principle with set relations. J Nonlinear Convex Anal. 2006;7(1):19–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández E, Rodríguez-Marín L. Nonconvex scalarization in set optimization with set-valued maps. J Math Anal Appl. 2007;325(1):1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuroiwa D. On set-valued optimization. Nonlinear Anal. 2001;47:1395–1400. doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00274-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn J. Vector optimization. Theory, applications, and extensions. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2004. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Klein E, Thompson AC. Theory of correspondences: including applications to mathematical economics. Canadian mathematical society series of monographs and advanced texts. New York (NY): Wiley; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Khan AA, Tammer C, Zalinescu C. Set-valued optimization. An introduction with applications. Berlin: Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel AH, Heyde F. Duality for set-valued measures of risk. SIAM J Financ Math. 2010;1:66–95. doi: 10.1137/080743494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen GY, Huang X, Yang X. Vector optimization. Set-valued and variational analysis. Berlin: Springer; 2005. (Lecture notes in econom. and math. systems; vol. 541).
   Google Scholar
• Jahn J. Vectorization in set optimization. J Optim Theory Appl. 2015;167(3):783–795. doi: 10.1007/s10957-013-0363-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luc DT. Theory of vector optimization. Berlin: Springer; 1989. (Lecture notes in econom. and math. systems; vol. 319).
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez C, Jiménez B, Novo V. Nonlinear scalarizations of set optimization problems with set orderings. In: Hamel A, Heyde F, Löhne A, Rudloff B, Schrage C, editors. Set optimization and applications. The state of the art. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2015. p. 43–63. (Proceedings in mathematics & statistics;151).
   Google Scholar
• Kuwano I, Tanaka T, Yamada S. Unified scalarization for sets in set-valued optimization. Surikaisekikenkyusho Kokyuroku. 2010;1685:270–280.
   Google Scholar
• Xu YD, Li SJ. A new nonlinear scalarization function and applications. Optimization. 2016;65:207–231. doi: 10.1080/02331934.2015.1014479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández E, Rodríguez-Marín L, Sama M. On solutions of set-valued optimization problems. Comput Math Appl. 2010;60:1401–1408. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn J, Ha TXD. New order relations in set optimization. J Optim Theory Appl. 2011;148(2):209–236. doi: 10.1007/s10957-010-9752-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuroiwa D. On natural criteria in set-valued optimization. RIMS Kokyuroku. 1998;1048:86–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kuroiwa D, Tanaka T, Ha TXD. On cone convexity of set-valued maps. Nonlinear Anal. 1997;30(3):1487–1496. doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00213-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi S, Saito Y, Tanaka T. Convexity for compositions of set-valued map and monotone scalarizing function. Pac J Optim. 2016;12(1):43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwano I, Tanaka T, Yamada S. Existence theorems for saddle points of set-valued maps via nonlinear scalarization methods. Surikaisekikenkyusho Kokyuroku. 2011;1755:210–217.
   Google Scholar
• Seto K, Kuroiwa D, Popovici N. A systematization of convexity and quasiconvexity concepts for set-valued maps, defined by l-type and u-type preorder relations. Optimization. 2018;67(7):1077–1094. doi: 10.1080/02331934.2018.1454920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn J. Directional derivatives in set optimization with the set less order relation. Taiwanese J Math. 2015;19(3):737–757. doi: 10.11650/tjm.19.2015.4940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerth (Tammer) C, Weidner P. Nonconvex separation theorems and some applications in vector optimization. J Optim Theory Appl. 1990;67(2):297–320. doi: 10.1007/BF00940478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miglierina E, Molho E. Scalarization and stability in vector optimization. J Optim Theory Appl. 2002;114(3):657–670. doi: 10.1023/A:1016031214488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda T. On optimization problems with set-valued objective maps: existence and optimality. J Optim Theory Appl. 2012;153(2):263–279. doi: 10.1007/s10957-011-9952-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogata Y, Tanaka T, Saito Y, et al. An alternative theorem for set-valued maps via set relations and its application to robustness of feasible sets. Optimization. 2018;67(7):1067–1075. doi: 10.1080/02331934.2018.1426582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köbis E, Köbis MA. Treatment of set order relations by means of a nonlinear scalarization functional: a full characterization. Optimization. 2016;65(10):1805–1827. doi: 10.1080/02331934.2016.1219355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwano I, Tanaka T, Yamada S. Unified scalarization for sets and set-valued Ky Fan minimax inequality. J Nonlinear Convex Anal. 2010;11(3):513–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez C, Miglierina E, Molho E, et al. Pointwise well-posedness in set optimization with cone proper sets. Nonlinear Anal. 2012;75:1822–1833. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ike K, Tanaka T. Convex-cone-based comparisons of and difference evaluations for fuzzy sets. Optimization. 2018;67(7):1051–1066. doi: 10.1080/02331934.2018.1432608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göpfert A, Riahi R, Tammer C, et al. Variational methods in partially ordered spaces. New York (NY): Springer; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hiriart-Urruty JB. Tangent cones, generalized gradients and mathematical programming in Banach spaces. Math Oper Res. 1979;4(1):79–97. doi: 10.1287/moor.4.1.79
   Google Scholar
• Zaffaroni A. Degrees of efficiency and degrees of minimality. SIAM J Control Optim. 2003;42:1071–1086. doi: 10.1137/S0363012902411532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinov AM, Singer I. Topical and sub-topical functions, downward sets and abstract convexity. Optimization. 2001;50:307–351. doi: 10.1080/02331930108844567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez B, Novo V, Vílchez A. A set scalarization function based on the oriented distance and relations with other set scalarizations. Optimization. 2018;67(12):2091–2116. doi: 10.1080/02331934.2018.1533554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez B, Novo V, Vílchez A. Characterization of set relations through extensions of the oriented distance. Math Meth Oper Res. 2019;1–31. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00186-019-00661-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu A, Nishizawa S, Tanaka T. Optimality conditions in set-valued optimization using nonlinear scalarization methods. Proceedings International Conference on Nonlinear Analysis and Convex Analysis (Okinawa 2005). Yokohama: Yokohama Publ.; 2007. p. 565–574.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Ansari QH, Yao JC. Characterizations of set order relations and constrained set optimization problems via oriented distance function. Optimization. 2017;66(11):1741–1754. doi: 10.1080/02331934.2017.1322082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha TXD. A Hausdorff-type distance, a directional derivative of a set-valued map and applications in set optimization. Optimization. 2018;67(7):1031–1050. doi: 10.1080/02331934.2017.1420186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köbis E, Kuroiwa D, Tammer C. Generalized set order relations and their numerical treatment. Appl Anal Optim. 2017;1(1):45–65.
   Google Scholar
• Khoshkhabar-amiranloo S, Khorram E, Soleimani-damaneh M. Nonlinear scalarization functions and polar cone in set optimization. Optim Lett. 2017;11:521–535. doi: 10.1007/s11590-016-1027-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar