On second-order optimality conditions for optimal control problems governed by the obstacle problem

References

• Mignot F. Contrôle dans les inéquations variationelles elliptiques. J Funct Anal. 1976;22(2):130–185.
   Google Scholar
• Kunisch K, Wachsmuth D. Sufficient optimality conditions and semi-smooth Newton methods for optimal control of stationary variational inequalities. ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var. 2012;18:520–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad Ali A, Deckelnick K, Hinze M. Global minima for optimal control of the obstacle problem; 2018. PreprintSPP1962-095. Available from: https://www.esaim-cocv.org/component/article?access=doi&doi=10.1051/cocv/2019039
   Google Scholar
• Harder F, Wachsmuth G. Comparison of optimality systems for the optimal control of the obstacle problem. GAMM-Mitt. 2018;40(4):312–338.
   Google Scholar
• Wachsmuth G. Strong stationarity for optimal control of the obstacle problem with control constraints. SIAM J Optim. 2014;24(4):1914–1932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergounioux M, Mignot F. Optimal control of obstacle problems: existence of Lagrange multipliers. ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var. 2000;5:45–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergounioux M. Optimal control of an obstacle problem. Appl Math Optim. 1997;36(2):147–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergounioux M, Tiba D. Optimal control for the obstacle problem with state constraints. ESAIM. 1998;4:7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer C, Thoma O. A priori finite element error analysis for optimal control of the obstacle problem. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2013;51(1):605–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito K, Kunisch K. Optimal control of elliptic variational inequalities. Appl Math Optim. 2000;41(3):343–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintermüller M, Kopacka I. Mathematical programs with complementarity constraints in function space: C- and strong stationarity and a path-following algorithm. SIAM J Optim. 2009;20(2):868–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Outrata J, Jarušek J, Stará J. On optimality conditions in control of elliptic variational inequalities. Set-Valued Var Anal. 2011;19(1):23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams RA. Sobolev spaces. New York: Academic Press; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Attouch H, Buttazzo G, Michaille G. Variational analysis in Sobolev and BV spaces. Philadelphia: SIAM; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Evans LC. Partial differential equations. 2nd ed. Providence, RI: AMS; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnans JF, Shapiro A. Perturbation analysis of optimization problems. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2000. (Springer series in operations research).
   Google Scholar
• Kinderlehrer D, Stampacchia G. An introduction to variational inequalities and their applications. Vol. 31. Philadelphia: SIAM; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wachsmuth G. A guided tour of polyhedric sets. J Convex Anal. 2019;26(1):153–188. Available from: http://www.heldermann.de/JCA/JCA26/JCA261/jca26010.htm.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christof C. Sensitivity analysis of elliptic variational inequalities of the first and the second kind [dissertation]. Technische Universität Dortmund; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbarg D, Trudinger NS. Elliptic partial differential equations of second order. Reprint of the 1998 ed. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Grisvard P. Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains. Boston: Pitman; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues JF. Obstacle problems in mathematical physics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Schiela A, Wachsmuth D. Convergence analysis of smoothing methods for optimal control of stationary variational inequalities with control constraints. ESAIM Math Model Numer Anal. 2013;47(3):771–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christof C, Müller G. A note on the equivalence and the boundary behavior of a class of Sobolev capacities. GAMM-Mitt. 2018;40(3):238–266.
   Google Scholar
• Wachsmuth G. Towards M-stationarity for optimal control of the obstacle problem with control constraints. SIAM J Control Optim. 2016;54(2):964–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams DR, Hedberg LI. Function spaces and potential theory. 2nd ed.Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1999. (Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften; 314).
   Google Scholar
• Christof C, Wachsmuth G. No-gap second-order conditions via a directional curvature functional. SIAM J Optim. 2018;28(3):2097–2130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhu VH, Son NH, Yao JC. Second-order necessary optimality conditions for semilinear elliptic optimal control problems. Appl Anal. 2017;96:626–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnans JF, Hermant A. Second-order analysis for optimal control problems with pure state constraints and mixed control-state constraints. Ann Inst H Poincaré Anal Non Linéaire. 2009;26(2):561–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergounioux M, Kunisch K. Primal-dual strategy for state-constrained optimal control problems. Comput Optim Appl. 2002;22:193–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas E, Mateos M, Vexler B. New regularity results and improved error estimates for optimal control problems with state constraints. ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var. 2014;20(3):803–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christof C, Meyer C. Sensitivity analysis for a class of H01-elliptic variational inequalities of the second kind. Set-Valued Var Anal. 2018;27(2):469–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar