Unlocking the Potential of New Media Technologies for Political Communication about Elections in Ghana

References

• Ahiabenu, K. 2013. ICTs Influence on Changing Face of Elections in Ghana: Myth or Reality? Accra: NED.
   Google Scholar
• Alec, C. Interactivity 2: New Media, Politics and Society. 2nd ed. Oxford: International Academic Publishers, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ancu, M., and R. Cozma. 2009. “MySpace Politics: Uses and Gratifications of Befriending Candidates.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 53 (4): 567–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150903333064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åström, J., and M. Karlsson. 2013. “Blogging in the Shadow of Parties: Exploring Ideological Differences in Online Campaigning.” Political Communication 30: 434–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barassi, V. 2016. “Datafied Citizens? Social Media Activism, Digital Traces and the Question about Political Profiling” Communication and the Public 1 (4): 494–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047316683200.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. 2014. “Digital Media in the Obama Campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the Personalised Political Communication Environment.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11 (2): 130–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.895691.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. 2015. “What’s Next? The Three Challenges for the Future of Political Communication Research.” New Technologies and Civic Engagements: New Agendas in Communication, edited by H. N. Gil de Zuniga, 216–30. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2007. “Communication, Power and Counter-Power in the Network Society.” International Journal of Communication 1 (1): 238–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ceron, A., and G. d’Adda. 2015. “E-Campaigning on Twitter: The Effectiveness of Distributive Promises and Negative Campaign in the 2013 Italian Election.” New Media and Society 18 (9): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815571915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A., and J. Stanyer. 2010. Political Communication in Transition: Mediated Politics in Britain‘s New Media Environment. London: American Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• CODEO. 2009. Final Report on Ghana‘s 2008 Presidential and Parlimentary Elections. Accra: CDD.
   Google Scholar
• de Bastion, G., M. Stiltz, and R. Herlitz. 2014. Social Media and Political Participation. Bonn: Gesellschaft für International Zusammenarbeit (GIZ).
   Google Scholar
• Ghana Statistical Service. 2017. “Statistics for Development and Progress. Provisional 2016 Annual Gross Domestic Product, April 2017.” Accessed November 20, 2017. www.statsghana.gov.gh.
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zuniga, H., and S. Valenzuela. 2011. “The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties and Civic Engagement.” Communication Research 38 (3): 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zuniga, H., and S. Shanin. 2015. “Social Media and Their Impact on Civic Participation.” In New Technologies and Civic Engagements: New Agendas in Communication, edited by H. G. D. Zuniga, 79–90. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750927.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, J., and P. N. Howard. 2013. Does Social Media Make a Difference in Political Communication? Digital Dividends in Brazil‘s 2010 National Elections Centre for Communication and Civic Engagement. Washington D.C.: University of Washington. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2273832.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., D. Jackson, and M. Broersma. 2014. “New Platform, Old Habits? Candidates’ Use of Twitter During the 2010 British and Dutch General Election Campaigns.” New Media and Society: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814546728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gueorguieva, V. 2008. “Voters, MySpace and YouTuble: The Impact of Alternative Communcation Channels on the 2006 Election Cycle and Beyond.” Social Science Computer Review 26 (3): 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307305636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, Jr., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Haridakis, P., and G. Hanson. 2011. “Campaign 2008: Comparing YouTube, Social Networking and Other Media Use among Younger and Older Voters.” In Techno Politics in Presidential Campaigning: New Voices, New Technologies, New Voters, edited by J. Hendricks and L. Kaid, 61–82. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• IPPR (Institute for Public Policy Research). 2014. “Social Media and Namibian elections.” Election Watch 5: 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. 2011. “The Media Game: New Moves, Old Strategies.” The Form 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1425.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., J. G. Blumler, and M. Gurevitch. 1974. “Utilisation of Mass Communication by the Individual.” In The Uses of Mass Communication: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research, edited by E. K. J. G. Blumler, 19–32. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, B. K., and T. J. Johnson. 2002. “Online and in the Know: Uses and Gratifications of the Web for Political Information.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 46 (1): 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, B. K., T. J. Johnson. 2004. “A Web for All Reasons: Uses and Gratifications of Internet Components for Political Information.” Telematics and Informatics 21 (3): 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5853(03)00037-6.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, O. A., and H. Moe. 2011. “Studying Political Microblogging: Twitter Users in the 2010 Swedish Election Campaign.” New Media and Society 14 (5): 729–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811422894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. 1948. “The Structure and Function of Communications in Society.” In The Communication of Ideas, edited by L. Bryson, 37–51. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., and J. Yang. 2014. “Political Knowledge Gaps among News Consumers with Different News Media Repertoires across Multiple Platforms.” International Journal of Communication 8: 597–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J., and L. Becker. 1974. “Testing the Validity of Gratification Measures through Political Effects Analysis.” In The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research, edited by J. Katz and E. Blumler, 137–67. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• NCA (National Communications Authority). 2016a. “Broadband Wireless Access.” Accessed May 29, 2017. https://www.nca.org.gh/assets/Uploads/BWA-Data-December2016.html.
   Google Scholar
• NCA (National Communications Authority). 2016b. Quarterly Statistical Bulletin on Communications in Ghana, 1(2). Accra: National Communications Authority.
   Google Scholar
• NCA (National Communications Authority). 2017a. “Telecom Voice Subscription.” Accessed May 29, 2017. https://www.nca.org.gh/industry-data-2/market-share-statistics-2/voice-2.html.
   Google Scholar
• NCA (National Communications Authority). 2017b. “Telecom Data Subscription.” Accessed May 19, 2017. https://www.nca.org.gh/industry-data-2/market-share-statistics-2/data-3.html.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. K., and C. Vaccari. 2013. “Do People ‘Like’ Politicians on Facebook? Not really. Large-Scale Direct Candidate-to-Voter Online Communication as an Outlier Phenomenon.” International Journal of Communication 7: 2333–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. K. 2014. “Political Communication Research: New Media, New Challenges and New Opportunities.” Journal of Media and Communication Research 30: 5–22. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.9712.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2014. Social Media and New Communication Tools in Good Practices in Development Communication. Paris: OECD Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Palmgreen, P., and J. D. Rayburn. 1985. “An Expectancy Approach to Media Gratifications.” In Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives, edited by K. E. Rosengren, L.A. Wenner, and P. Palmgreen, 61–72. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z., and A. M. Rubin. 2000. “Predictors of Internet Use.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electonic Media 44: 175–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z., and A. Mendelson. 2008. Friends, Networks & Zombies: The Social Utility of Facebook. Copenhagen: Association of Internet researchers.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. 2009a. “The Virtual Sphere 2.0: The Internet, the Public Sphere and Beyond.” In The Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, edited by A. Howard and P. N. Chadwick, 230–45. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. 2009b. “Uses and Gratifications.” In An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research, edited by D. Stacks and W. Salwen, 137–52. NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Postelnicu, M., and R. Cozma. 2008. Befriending the Candidate: Uses and Gratifications of Candidate Profiles on MySpace. San Diego: National Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M., and E. M. Perse. 1987. “Audience Activity and Television News Gratifications.” Communication Research 14 (1): 58–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schill, D., R. Kirk, and A. E. Jasperson. 2017. Political Communication in Real Time: Theoretical and Research Approaches. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315669083.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, R. 2015. “Civic Engagement of Youths during Their Transition to Adulthood.” In New Technologies and Civic Engagements: New Agendas in Communication, edited by H. G. de Zuniga, 46–58. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V. 2016. “Conversation Is the Soul of Democracy: Expression Effects, Communication Mediation and Digital Media.” Communication and the Public 1 (1): 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047316628310.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, P. 2008. “Student Favourite: Facebook and Motives for Its Use.” Southern Mass Communication Journal 23 (2): 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. 2009. “How Cell Phones, Twitter, Facebook Can Make History.” TED video, 15:41. https://www.ted.com/talks/clay_shirky_how_cellphones_twitter_facebook_can_make_history.
   Google Scholar
• Skoric, M. 2015. “Social Media and Youth Participation in Singapore.” In New Technologies and Civic Engagements: New Agendas in Communication, edited by H. G. de Zuniga, 59–77. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., and A. M. Limperos. 2013. “Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New Media.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 57 (4): 504–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.845827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, H. 2011. “Mobile Phones, Popular Media and Everyday African Democracy: Transmissions and Transgressions.” Popular Communication 9: 146–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2011.56 2097. doi: 10.1080/15405702.2011.562097
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. P., and E. Serge. 2011. “Evaluating Candidate E-mail Messages in the 2008 U . S . Presidential Campaign.” In Technopolitics in Presidential Campaigning: New Voices, New Technologies and New Voters, edited by J. Hendricks and L. Kaid, 44–57. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. 2015. “Internet, Egocentric Publics and Extremism.” In Technopolitics in Presidential Campaigning: New Voices, New Technologies and New Voters, edited by J. Hendricks and L. Kaid, 104–21. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar