References
- Ahern, K. 2017. “Why Universities Need to Tell Better Stories,” Cosmos, The Science of Everything, accessed May 14, 2019. https://cosmosmagazine.com/society/why-universities-need-to-tell-better-stories.
- Allan, S. 2011. “Introduction: Science Journalism in a Digital Age.” Journalism 12 (7): 771–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911412688.
- Ashwell, D. 2016. “The Challenges of Science Journalism: The Perspectives of Scientists, Science Communication Advisors and Journalists from New Zealand.” Public Understanding of Science 25 (3): 379–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514556144.
- Autzen, C. 2014. “Press Releases – The New Trend in Science Communication.” Journal of Science Communication 13 (3): C02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13030302.
- Autzen, C. 2018. “Academic Press Releases Caught between Theory and Practice: Making Sense of a Contested Science Communication Practice.” PhD diss., University of Southern Denmark.
- Audit Bureau of Circulations of South Africa. 2018. “Audit Bureau of Circulations of South Africa.” Accessed April 13, 2020. http://abc.org.za/.
- Bakyawa, J., M. Devlin, D. Serwadda, and C. Ijsselmuiden. 2013. “Implementing a Health Research Communication Program in a Low Resource Country: Experience from Uganda’s Makerere University School of Public Health.” Scholarly and Research Communication 4 (2): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2013v4n2a103.
- Bodmer, W. 1985. The Public Understanding of Science. London: The Royal Society. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/1985/10700.pdf.
- Botha, J., and M. Hunter-Hüsselman. 2016. “The Management and Use of Research-Related Information by a Selection of Research-Intensive Universities in South Africa.” In Institutional Research in South African Higher Education: Intersecting Contexts and Practices, edited by J. Botha and N. J. Muller, 299–317. Stellenbosch: Sun Press. https://doi.org/10.18820/9781928357186/15.
- Carver, R. 2014. “Public Communication from Research Institutes: Is It Science Communication or Public Relations?” Journal of Science Communication 13 (3): C01. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13030301.
- Chikoore, L., S. Probets, J. Fry, and C. Creaser. 2016. “How Are UK Academics Engaging the Public with Their Research? A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective.” Higher Education Quarterly 70 (2): 145–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12088.
- Cicerone, R. J. 2006. “Celebrating and Rethinking Science Communication.” In Focus 6 (3): 1–2.
- Claassen, G. 2011. “Science and the Media in South Africa: Reflecting a ‘Dirty Mirror.’” Communicatio 37 (3): 351–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2011.622288.
- Claessens, M. 2014. “Research Institutions: Neither Doing Science Communication nor Promoting ‘Public’ Relations.” Journal of Science Communication 13 (3): C03. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13030303.
- Currah, A. 2009. “Challenges: What’s Happening to Our News.” Accessed September 28, 2018. http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/documents/Publications/ What_s_Happening_to_Our_News.pdf.
- Davies, S. R. 2008. “Constructing Communication: Talking to Scientists about Talking to the Public.” Science Communication, 29 (4): 413–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008316222.
- Davies, N. 2009. Flat Earth News: An Award-Winning Reporter Exposes Falsehood, Distortion and Propaganda in the Global Media. London: Vintage.
- Davies, S. R., and M. Horst. 2016. “Identities: How Scientists Represent Collectives, Construct Identities, and Make Sense of Science.” In Science Communication: Culture, Identity and Citizenship, edited by S. R. Davies and M. Horst, 53–77. Copenhagen: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50366-4_3.
- Davis, M., D. Lohm, P. Flowers, E. Waller, and N. Stephensone. 2014. “‘We Became Sceptics’: Fear and Media Hype in General Public Narrative on the Advent of Pandemic Influenza.” Sociological Inquiry 84 (4): 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12058.
- DST (Department of Science and Technology). 2019. White Paper on Science, Technology and Innovation. Accessed May 14, 2019. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/sciencetechnologywhitepaper.pdf.
- Fahy, D., and M. C. Nisbet. 2011. “The Science Journalist Online: Shifting Roles and Emerging Practices.” Journalism 12 (7): 778–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911412697.
- Fuller, J. 2010. What Is Happening to News: The Information Explosion and the Crisis in Journalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226268996.001.0001.
- Göpfert, W. 2007. “The Strength of PR and the Weakness of Science Journalism.” In Journalism, Science and Society: Science Communication between News and Public Relations, edited by M. Bauer and M. Bucchi, 215–26. New York: Routledge.
- Guenther, L., P. Weingart, and M. Joubert. 2019. “Bridging a Gap? Mapping the Science Coverage of South African Newspapers.” In The Cultural Authority of Science: Comparing across Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas, edited by M. W. Bauer, P. Pansegrau, and R. Shukla, 122–36. UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315163284-8.
- Illbury, D. 2012. “The State of Science Journalism in South Africa.” Accessed June 10, 2019. http://www.darylilbury.com/wordpress/?p=393.
- Jia, H., and L. Liu. 2014. “Unbalanced Progress: The Hard Road from Science Popularisation to Public Engagement with Science in China.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 32–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513476404.
- Johnston, J., and S. Forde. 2017. “Churnalism.” Digital Journalism 5 (8): 943–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1355026.
- Kamenetzky, J. R. 2013. “Opportunities for Impact: Statistical Analysis of the National Science Foundation’s Broader Impacts Criterion.” Science and Public Policy 40 (1): 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs059.
- Leshner, A. I. 2003. “Public Engagement with Science.” Science 299 (5609): 977. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.299.5609.977.
- Lewis, J., A. Williams, and B. Franklin. 2008. “Four Rumours and an Explanation.” Journalism Practice 2 (1): 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780701768493.
- Macnamara, J. 2016. “The Continuing Convergence of Journalism and PR: New Insights for Ethical Practice from a Three-Country Study of Senior Practitioners.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 93 (1): 118–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015605803.
- Mannix, L. 2019. “University of Sydney Pulls Claims Elderberries Can Fight Flu.” Accessed July 19, 2019. https://www.smh.com.au/national/university-of-sydney-pulls-claims-elderberries-can-fight-flu-20190515-p51nij.html.
- Marcinkowski, F. and M. Kohring. 2014. “The Changing Rationale of Science Communication: A Challenge to Scientific Autonomy.” Journal of Science Communication 13 (03): C04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13030304.
- Marcinkowski, F., M. Kohring, S. Fürst, and A. Friedrichsmeier. 2014. “Organizational Influence on Scientists’ Efforts to Go Public: An Empirical Investigation.” Science Communication 36 (1): 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013494022.
- Massarani, L., I. De Castro Moreira. 2016. “Science Communication in Brazil: A Historical Review and Considerations about the Current Situation.” Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences 88 (3): 1577–595. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201620150338.
- Master, Z., and D. Resnik. 2013. “Hype and Public Trust in Science.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2): 321–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9327-6.
- Medvecky, F., and J. Leach. 2017. “The Ethics of Science Communication.” Journal of Science Communication 16 (4): E1–5. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16040501.
- Mooney, C., and S. Kirshenbaum. 2009. Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future. New York: Basic Books.
- Murcott, T., and A. Williams. 2013. “The Challenges for Science Journalism in the UK.” Progress in Physical Geography 37 (2): 152–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312471285.
- Nadkarni, N. M., A. E. Stasch. 2013. “How Broad Are Our Broader Impacts? An Analysis of the National Science Foundation’s Ecosystem Studies Program and the Broader Impacts Requirement.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11 (1): 13–9. https://doi.org/10.1890/110106.
- New Jersey Institute of Technology. 2018. “How to Evaluate Information Sources: Identify Bias.” Accessed July 6, 2020. https://researchguides.njit.edu/evaluate/bias.
- Nielsen, L., N. Jorgensen, K. Jantzen, L. Christensen. 2007. “An Exploratory Study of Credibility Issues in Astronomy Press Releases.” CAP Journal 1 (1): 5–9.
- Neuendorf, K. A. 2017. The Content Analysis Guidebook, 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802878.
- Peters, H. P., H. Heinrichs, A. Jung, M. Kalfass, and I. Petersen. 2008. “Medialization of Science as a Prerequisite of Its Legitimization and Political Relevance.” In Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices, edited by D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele and S. Shi, 71–92. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_5.
- Priest, S., J. Goodwin, and M. F. Dahlstrom, eds. 2018. Ethics and Practice in Science Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226497952.001.0001.
- Rautela, G. S., and K. Chowdury. 2016. “Science, Science Literacy and Communication.” Indian Journal of History of Science 51 (3): 494–510. https://doi.org/10.16943/ijhs/2016/v51i3/48850.
- Reddy, C. 2009. “Scientist Citizens.” Science 323 (5920): 1405. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1173003.
- Rensberger, B. 2009. “Science Journalism: Too Close for Comfort.” Nature 459 (7250): 1055–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/4591055a.
- Rinaldi, A. 2012. “To Hype, or not to(o) Hype. Communication of Science is Often Tarnished by Sensationalization, for Which Both Scientists and the Media are Responsible.” EMBO Reports 13 (4): 303–07. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.39.
- Rödder, S. 2009. “Reassessing the Concept of a Medialization of Science: A Story from the ‘book of life.’” Public Understanding of Science 18 (4): 452–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507081168.
- Rödder, S. 2011. “Science and the Mass Media: ‘Medialization’ as a New Perspective on an Intricate Relationship.” Sociology Compass 5 (9): 834–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00410.x.
- Rödder, S., and M. S. Schäfer. 2010. “Repercussion and Resistance: An Empirical Study on the Interrelation between Science and Mass Media.” Communications 35 (3): 249–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2010.014.
- Rowe, D., and K. Brass. 2011. “‘We Take Academic Freedom Quite Seriously’: How University Media Offices Manage Academic Public Communication.” International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 7 (1): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1386/mcp.7.1.3_1.
- Sachs, J. 2012. Winning the Story Wars: Why Those Who Tell–and Live–the Best Stories Will Rule the Future. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
- Saridou, T., L.-P. Spyridou, A. Veglis. 2017. “Churnalism on the Rise? Assessing Convergence Effects on Editorial Practices.” Digital Journalism 5 (8): 1006–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1342209.
- Schäfer, M. S. 2009. “From Public Understanding to Public Engagement: An Empirical Assessment of Changes in Science Coverage.” Science Communication 30 (4): 475–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008326943.
- Schäfer, M. S. 2011. “Sources, Characteristics and Effects of Mass Media Communication on Science: A Review of the Literature, Current Trends and Areas for Future Research.” Sociology Compass 5 (6): 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00373.x.
- Scheufele, D. A. 2013. “Communicating Science in Social Settings.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Suppl. 3): 14040–47. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213275110.
- Scheufele, D. A., and N. M. Krause. 2019. “Science Audiences, Misinformation, and Fake News.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (16): 7662–669. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805871115.
- Searle, S. D. 2011. “Scientists’ Communication with the General Public: An Australian Survey.” DPhil diss., The Australian National University.
- Shipman, M. 2015. Handbook for Science Public Information Officers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226179636.001.0001.
- Skrip, M. M. 2015. “Crafting and Evaluating Broader Impact Activities: A Theory-Based Guide for Scientists.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 13 (5): 273–79. https://doi.org/10.1890/140209.
- Sumner, P., S. Vivian-Griffiths, J. Boivin, A. Williams, C. A. Venetis, A. Davies, J. Ogden, L. Whelan, B. Hughes, B. Dalton, F. Boy, and C. D. Chambers. 2014. “The Association between Exaggeration in Health Related Science News and Academic Press Releases: Retrospective Observational Study.” The British Medical Journal 349 (g7015). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7015.
- Sumner, P., S. Vivian-Griffiths, J. Boivin, A. Williams, L. Bott, R. Adams, C. A. Venetis, L. Whelan, B. Hughes, and C. D. Chambers. 2016. “Exaggerations and Caveats in Press Releases and Health-Related Science News.” PLoS ONE 11 (12): e0168217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168217.
- Terama, E., M. Smallman, S. J. Lock, C. Johnson, M. Z. Austwick. 2016. “Beyond Academia: Interrogating Research Impact in the Research Excellence Framework.” PLOS ONE 11 (12): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168533.
- Van Hout, T., and S. van Leuven. 2016. “Investigating ‘Churnalism’ in Real-Time News.” In Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies, edited by B. Franklin and S. Edridge, 117–25. s.l.: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713793-12.
- Van Zuydam, L. 2018. “Science Journalism in South Africa is Lacking.” Accessed April 21, 2019. https://www.iol.co.za/pretoria-news/science-journalism-in-south-africa-is-lacking-18387678.
- Weingart, P. 1998. “Science and the Media.” Research Policy 27 (8): 869–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00096-1.
- Weingart, P. 2002. “The Moment of Truth for Science.” EMBO Reports 3 (8): 703–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/embo-reports/kvf165.
- Weingart, P. 2012. “The Lure of the Mass Media and Its Repercussions on Science.” In The Sciences’ Media Connection: Public Communication and its Repercussions, edited by S. Rödder, M. Franzen, and P. Weingart, 17–32. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2085-5_2.
- Weingart, P. 2017. “Is There a Hype Problem in Science? If So, How Is It Addressed?” In The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication, edited by K. Jamieson, D. Kahan, and D. Scheufele, 111–18. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.12.
- Weingart, P., and L. Guenther. 2016. “Science Communication and the Issue of Trust.” Journal of Science Communication 15 (05): C01. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15050301.
- Weitkamp, E. 2014. “On the Roles of Scientists, Press Officers and Journalists.” JCOM 13 (3): E. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13030501.
- Wernick, A. 2006. “Rebranding Harvard.” Theory, Culture and Society 23 (2–3): 566–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406023002102.
- Wiley, S. L. 2014. “Doing Broader Impacts? The National Science Foundation (NSF) Broader Impacts Criterion and Communication-Based Activities.” MSc thesis, Iowa State University.