A co-evolving frontier between land and water: dilemmas of flexibility versus robustness in flood risk management

References

• Begum, S.Stive, M. J. F. & Hall, J. W. (Eds). (2007). Flood risk management in Europe: Innovation in policy and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Berke, P. R., & Campanella, T. J. (2006). Planning for postdisaster resiliency. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), 192–207. doi:10.1177/0002716205285533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. (2010). Complex systems, evolutionary planning? In G. de Roo & E. A. Silva (Eds.), A planner’s encounter with complexity (pp. 81–98). Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, L., & De Roo, G. (forthcoming). Planning of undefined becoming; From post-structuralism towards actor-relational opportunities. Planning Theory. doi:10.1177/1473095214542631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisot, M., & Child, J. (1999). Organizations as adaptive systems in complex environments: The case of China. Organization Science, 10(3), 237–252. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botzen, W., Aerts, J., & van den Bergh, J. (2009). Willingness of homeowners to mitigate climate risk through insurance. Ecological Economics, 68(8–9), 2265–2277. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R., Akter, S., Brander, L., & Haque, E. (2007). Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk: A case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh. Risk Analysis, 27(2), 313–326. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00884.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugnach, M., Dewulf, A., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Taillieu, T. (2008). Toward a relational concept of uncertainty: About knowing too little, knowing too differently, and accepting not to know. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 30. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art30/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruijn, K. M. de. (2005). Resilience and flood risk management: A systems approach applied to lowland rivers. Delft: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2012). A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Analysis, 32(9), 1481–1495. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., & Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 4(8), 765–781. doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. J. (1998). Flood insurance as a management strategy for UK coastal resilience. The Geographical Journal, 164(3), 333. doi:10.2307/3060621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coninx, I., & Cuppen, M. (2010). Institutionele antwoorden op complexiteit: een vergelijkende analyse van hoogwaterbeleid/overstromingsbeheer in de ‘lage landen’. Paper presented at the Politicologenetmaal 2010, Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., … Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? ‘Reframing’ resilience: Challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: Resilience assessment of a pasture management system in Northern Afghanistan Urban Resilience: What does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? The politics of resilience for planning: A cautionary note  Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–333. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Google Scholar
• Dessai, S., & van der Sluijs, J. (2007). Uncertainty and climate change adaptation: A scoping study. Utrecht: Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Department of Science Technology and Society.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., & van Buuren, M. W. (2006). Innovations in the Dutch Polder: Communities of practice and the challenge of coevolution. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(1), 42–49. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/10654
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, G. (2002). Flood risk management: Learning to live with rivers. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 31(5), 437–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L. (2008). The Gentle Art of Coevolution: A complexity theory perspective on decision making over estuaries in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L. (2011). A coevolutionary revision of decision making processes: An analysis of port extensions in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands. Public Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 309–341. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41506760
   Google Scholar
• Grothmann, T., & Reusswig, F. (2006). People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards, 38(1–2), 101–120. doi:10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T. (2009). Clumsy floodplains and the law: Towards a responsive land policy for extreme floods. Built Environment, 35(4), 531–544. doi:10.2148/benv.35.4.531
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T. (2010). Reframing polyrational floodplains: Land policy for large areas for temporary emergency retention. Nature & Culture, 5(1), 15–30. doi:10.3167/nc.2010.050102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T. (2011a). Clumsy floodplains: Responsive land policy for extreme floods. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T. (2011b). Contesting land policies for space for rivers - rational, viable, and clumsy floodplain management. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 4(3), 165–175. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01101.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T. (2012). Land policy for German Rivers: Making space for the rivers. In J. F. Warner, A. van Buuren, & J. Edelenbos (Eds.), Making space for the river. Governance experiences with multifunctional river planning in the US and Europe (pp. 121–133). London: IWA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Driessen, P. P. (2014). The flood risk management plan: Towards spatial water governance. Journal of Flood Risk Management, n/a. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Juepner, R. (2014). The flood risk management plan: An essential step towards the institutionalization of a paradigm shift. International Journal of Water Governance, 2, 107–118. doi:10.7564/13-IJWG5
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Jüpner, R. (2013). Der Hochwasserrisikomanagementplan – Herausforderung für Wasserwirtschaft und Raumplanung. In J. Stamm & K. -U. Graw (Eds.), Wasserbaukolloquium 2013. Technischer und organisatorischer Hochwasserschutz - Bauwerke, Anforderungen, Modelle (pp. 183–192). Dresden: Wasserbauliche Mitteilungen.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Needham, B. (2012a). Introduction: Why reconsider planning by law and property rights? In T. Hartmann & B. Needham (Eds.), Planning by law and property rights reconsidered (pp. 1–23). Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T. & Needham, B. (Eds.) (2012b). Planning by law and property rights reconsidered. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2010). Introduction: Planning at yet another crossroads? In J. Hillier & P. Healey (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to planning theory. Conceptual challenges for spatial planning (pp. 1–34). Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In P. C. Schulze (Ed.), Engineering within ecological constraints (pp. 31–43). Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, G. (2006). Strategies for flood risk management - A process perspective. Flood Risk Management: Hazards, Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures, 67, 229–246.
   Google Scholar
• Internationale Kommission zum Schutz des Rheins. (2002). Hochwasservorsorge Maßnahmen und ihre Wirksamkeit. Retrieved from http://www.iksr.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Dokumente_de/RZ_iksr_dt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability: IPCC WGII AR5 Chapter 23. IPCC. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M. A., Schoon, M. L., Ke, W., & Börner, K. (2006). Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 240–252. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. L., & Priest, S. J. (2008). Flood risk management in England: A changing landscape of risk responsibility. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(4), 513–525. doi:10.1080/07900620801923146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis, G. (2007). Socio-environmental co-evolution: Some ideas for an analytical approach. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 14(1), 4–13. doi:10.1080/13504500709469703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, R. J. T., Nicholls, R. J., & Thomalla, F. (2003). Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Environmental Hazards, 5(1), 35–45. doi:10.1016/j.hazards.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Loucks, D. P. (2000). Sustainable water resources management. Water International, 25(1), 3–10. doi:10.1080/02508060008686793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks, D. P., Stedinger, J. R., Davis, D. W., & Stakhiv, E. Z. (2008). Private and public responses to flood risks. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(4), 541–553. doi:10.1080/07900620801923286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeman, R., & Smit, B. (2006). Migration as an adaptation to climate change. Climatic Change, 76(1–2), 31–53. doi:10.1007/s10584-005-9000-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003). Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives of organisations: The application of complexity theory to organisations. In E. Mitleton-Kelly (Ed.), Advanced series in management. Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organisations. The application of complexity theory to organisations (pp. 23–50). Oxford: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Munich Re (Ed). (2010). Natural catastrophes 2010: Analyses, assessments, positions. Topics Geo, 2010. Munich: Munich Reinsurance Company.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, B., & Hartmann, T. (2012). Conclusion: Planning by law and property rights reconsidered. In T. Hartmann & B. Needham (Eds.), Planning by law and property rights reconsidered (pp. 219–227). Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Nisipeanu, P. (2008). Tradition oder Fortentwicklung? Wasserrecht im UGB. Natur und Recht, 30, 87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2006). Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resources Management, 21(1), 49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, J. (2007). Sustainable development, sustainable decisions and the precautionary principle. Natural Hazards, 42(3), 515–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patt, H. & Juepner, R. (Eds). (2013). Hochwasser Handbuch: Auswirkungen und Schutz. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Petrow, T., Thieken, A. H., Kreibich, H., Merz, B., & Bahlburg, C. H. (2006). Improvements on flood alleviation in Germany: Lessons learned from the Elbe flood in August 2002. Environmental Management, 38(5), 717–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierdolla, M. (2008). Floating Homes: Eine schwimmende Wohnform als neues städtebauliches Element in Deutschland. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, D., & Warner, J. (2007). Flood risk, uncertainty and changing river protection policy in the Netherlands: The case of calamity polders? Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(4), 519–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2008). Natural hazards and motivation for mitigation behavior: People cannot predict the affect evoked by a severe flood. Risk Analysis, 28(3), 771–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempels, B. (2013). Veerkracht En Ruimtelijke Planning. Agora, 29(4), 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, E. L., & Adger, W. N. (2004). Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change? Ecology and Society, 9(2), 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art10/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. (2010). Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 570–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Brink, M. (2009). Rijkswaterstaat on the horns of a dilemma. Delft: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Vis, M., Klijn, F., Bruijn, K. de, & van Buuren, M. (2003). Resilience strategies for flood risk management in the Netherlands. International Journal of River Basin Management, 1(1), 33–40.
   Google Scholar