Benefit-sharing and upstream/downstream cooperation for ecological protection of transboundary waters: opportunities for China as an upstream state

References

• Adams, J. (2012). Determination and implementation of environmental water requirements for estuaries (Ramsar Technical Report No. 9/CBD Technical Series No. 69). Gland/Quebec: Ramsar Convention Secretariat/Secretariat of the CBD.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilar, G., & Iza, A. (2011). Governance of shared waters: Legal and institutional issues. Gland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Alpizar, F., & Bovarnick, A. (2013). Targeted scenario analysis: A new approach to capturing and presenting ecosystem service values for decision making. New York, NY: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton, A. D., & Bradford, A. (2013). Demonstration of a methodology for setting ecological flow and water level targets. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 38(4), 296–310. doi:10.1080/07011784.2013.830371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, A. H. (2013). Payment for ecosystem services. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 16(2), 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Birnie, P., & Boyle, A. (1992). International law and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, C. (2001). The international law association’s contribution to international water resources law. In S. Bogdanovic (Ed.), International law of water resources: Contribution of the international law association (1954–2000). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Brander, L. (2013). Guidance manual on value transfer methods for ecosystems services. Nairobi: UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• Brels, S., Coates, D., & Loures, F. (2008). Transboundary water resources management: The role of international watercourse agreements in implementation of the CBD. Quebec: Secretariat of the CBD.
   Google Scholar
• Brunnée, J., & Toope, S. J. (1994). Environmental security and freshwater resources: A case for international ecosystems law. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 5, 41–76. doi:10.1093/yiel/5.1.41
   Google Scholar
• Brunnée, J., & Toope, S. J. (1997). Environmental security and freshwater resources: Ecosystem regime building. The American Journal of International Law, 91(1), 26–59. doi:10.2307/2954139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buono, R. M., & Eckstein, G. (2014). Minute 319: A cooperative approach to Mexico–US hydro-relations on the Colorado River. Water International, 39(3), 263–276. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.906879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caponera, D. (1987). The role of customary international water law. In M. Ali, A. Khan, & G. Radosewich (Eds.), Water resources policy for Asia (pp. 365). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Rieu-Clarke, A., & Wouters, P. (2013). Exploring China’s transboundary water treaty practice through the prism of the UN watercourses convention. Water International, 38(2), 217–230. doi:10.1080/02508060.2013.782134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, L. (2014). Exploring China’s approach to implementing ‘eco-compensation’ schemes: The Lake Tai Watershed as case study considered through a legal lens. Water International, 39(5), 755–773. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.950860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuy, P.-M. (1991). Overview of the existing customary legal regime regarding international pollution. In D. B. McGraw (Ed.), International law and pollution (pp. 61). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Forslund, A., Malm Renöfält, B., Barchiesi, S., Cross, K., Davidson, S., Farrell, T., … Smith, M. (2009). Securing water for ecosystems and human well-being: The importance of environmental flows (Swedish Water House Report 24). Stockholm: Swedish International Water Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, X. (1996). The criteria for the equitable utilization of international rivers. British Yearbook of International Law, 67, 337–412. doi:10.1093/bybil/67.1.337
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, X. (1998). Sustainable development and the equitable utilization of international watercourses. British Yearbook of International Law, 69, 119–200. doi:10.1093/bybil/69.1.119
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, T. (2007). Treaty making and treaty evolution. In D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée, & E. Hey (Eds.), The oxford handbook of international environmental law (pp. 467–497). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handl, G. (1975). Balancing of interests and international liability for the pollution of international watercourses: Customary principles of law revisited. Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 13, 156–194.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2014). Significant international environmental law cases: 2012–14. Journal of Environmental Law, 26, 519–540. doi:10.1093/jel/equ028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, D., Wu, R., Feng, Y., Li, Y., Ding, C., Wang, W., & Yu, D. W. (2014). Review: China’s transboundary waters: new paradigms for water and ecological security through applied ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(5), 1159–1168. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBWC. (2012). Interim International Cooperative Measures in the Colorado Basin through 2017 and Extension of Minute 318 Cooperative measures to Address the Continued Effects of the April 2010 Earthquake in the Mexicali Valley, Baja California (Minute 319, Coronado, 20 November 2012), interpreting the US–Mexico Treaty Regarding Utilization of the Waters of the Colorado and the Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande (Washington DC, 3 February 1944, entered into force 8 November 1945).
   Google Scholar
• ICJ. (2011, March 8). Certain activities carried out by Nicaragua in the Border area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Request for Provisional Measures Order.
   Google Scholar
• IJC. (1959). Report of the international joint commission on principles for determining and apportioning benefits from cooperative use of storage waters and electrical interconnection within the Columbia River System.
   Google Scholar
• ILA. (1966). Report of the Fifty-Second Conference. London: International Law Association.
   Google Scholar
• ILA. (2004). Berlin rules on water resources law. London: International Law Association.
   Google Scholar
• ILC. (1994). Report of the international law commission on the work of its forty-sixth session, UN Doc. A/49/10 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. (2006). PAY: Establishing payments for watershed services. Gland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Lac Lanoux Arbitral Tribunal. (1957). Lac Lanoux Arbitration (France v. Spain), award of 16 November 1957. International Law Reports, 24, 101.
   Google Scholar
• Landsberg, F., Ozment, S., Stickler, M., Henninger, N., Treweek, J., Venn, O., & Mock, G. (2011). Ecosystem services review for impact assessment: Introduction and guide to scoping. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Leb, C. (2012). Cooperation in the law of transboundary water resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leb, C. (2014). One step at a time: International law and the duty to cooperate in the management of shared water resources. Water International, 40(1). doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.978972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (2014). Benefit sharing in the Mekong river basin. Water International, 40(1). doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.978974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRoy Poff, N., & Matthews, J. H. (2013). Environmental flows in the Anthropocence: past progress and future prospects. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(6), 667–675. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. G., Ouyang, Z. Y., Yang, W., Xu, W. H., & Li, S. X. (2013). Evaluation of ecosystem services policies from biophysical and social perspectives: The case of China. In S. A. Levin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of biodiversity (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 372–384). Waltham: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X. (2007). Statement on the ILC’s work on shared natural resources and responsibility of international organizations. Chinese Journal of International Law, 6(3), 769–772. doi:10.1093/chinesejil/jmm045
   Google Scholar
• Magee, D. (2012). The dragon upstream: China’s role in Lancang-Mekong development. In J. Öjendal, S. Hansson, & S. Hellberg (Eds.), Politics and development in a transboundary watershed (pp. 171–193). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, S. (2001). The law of international watercourses: Non-navigational uses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, S. C. (2007a). Some developments in the law of international watercourses. In M. Kohen (Ed.), Promoting justice, human rights, and conflict resolution through international law: Liber Amicorum Lucius Caflisch. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, S. C. (2007b). The law of international watercourses (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, O. (2004). The emergence of an ‘ecosystem approach’ to the protection of international watercourses under international law. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 13(1), 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9388.2004.00379.x
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, O. (2007). The environmental protection of international watercourses under international law. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, O. (2013b). Utilization of shared international freshwater resources – the meaning and role of ‘equity’ in international water law. Water International, 38(2), 112–129. doi:10.1080/02508060.2013.779199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, O. (2014). The protection of freshwater ecosystems revisited: Towards a common understanding of the ‘ecosystems approach’ to the protection of transboundary water resources. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 23(1), 88–95. doi:10.1111/reel.12068
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, O. (2013a). The contribution of procedural rules to environmental protection of transboundary rivers. In L. Boisson de Chazournes, C. Leb and M. Tignino (Eds.), Freshwater and international law: The multiple challenges (pp. 239–265). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paisley, R. (2002). Adversaries into partners: International water law and the equitable sharing of downstream benefits. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 3, 280–300.
   Google Scholar
• Pardy, B. (2014). The logic of ecosystems: Capitalism, rights and the law of ‘ecosystem services’. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 5(2), 136–152. doi:10.4337/jhre.2014.03.02
   Google Scholar
• PCA (2013a, February 18). Indus waters Kishenganga Arbitration (Pakistan v. India), Partial Award.
   Google Scholar
• PCA (2013b, December 20). Indus waters Kishenganga Arbitration (Pakistan v. India), Final Award.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D., Daoudy, M., McCaffrey, S., Öjendal, J., & Turton, A. (2006). Trans-boundary water cooperation as a tool for conflict prevention and for broader benefit-sharing. Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Pitzer, P. (1999). Annex 11: Negotiating the Columbia basin treaty, draft Grand Coulee dam and Columbia basin project case study (Working Paper, World Commission on Dams).
   Google Scholar
• Rieu-Clarke, A., & Spray, C. (2013). Ecosystem services and international water law: Towards a more effective determination and implementation of equity. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 16(2), 12–65.
   Google Scholar
• Russi, D., Ten Brink, P., Farmer, A., Badura, T., Coates, D., Förster, J. … Davidson, N. (2013). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (TEEB) for water and wetlands. London and Brussels/Gland: IEEP/Ramsar Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Sadoff, C. W., & Grey, D. (2002). Beyond the river: the benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water Policy, 4(5), 389–403.
   Google Scholar
• Sadoff, C. W., & Grey, D. (2005). Cooperation on international rivers: A continuum for securing and sharing benefits. Water International, 30(4), 420–427. doi:10.1080/02508060508691886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salman, S. M. A. (2010). Downstream riparians can also harm upstream riparians: The concept of foreclosure of future uses. Water International, 35(4), 350–364. doi:10.1080/02508060.2010.508160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salman, S. M. A. (2014). Entry into force of the UN Watercourses Convention: why should it matter? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 1–13. doi:10.1080/07900627.2014.952072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saul, B. (2011, November). China, Resources and International Law. Sydney Law School, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11/82. Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1954180
   Google Scholar
• Speed, R., Ji, Y., Le Quesne, T., Pegram, G., & Zhiwei, Z. (2013). Basin water allocation planning: principles, procedures and approaches for basin allocation planning. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Tanzi, A., & Arcari, M. (2001). The United Nations convention on the law of international watercourses. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Tarlock, A. D. (1996). International water law and the protection of river system ecosystem integrity. Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law, 10(2), 181–211.
   Google Scholar
• Tarlock, A. D. (2014). Mexico and the United States assume a legal duty to provide Colorado River delta restoration flows: An important international environmental and water law precedent. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 23(1), 76–87. doi:10.1111/reel.12066
   Google Scholar
• Tarlock, A. D., & Wouters, P. (2007). Are shared benefits of international waters and equitable apportionment? Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 18(3), 523–536.
   Google Scholar
• UNCED. (1992a), Rio declaration on environment and development. UN Doc. A/CONF/151/5 Rev.1. International Legal Materials, 31, 876.
   Google Scholar
• UNCED. (1992b), Agenda 21. UN Doc. A/CONF/151/26, Vol. 1.
   Google Scholar
• UNCHE. (1972). Stockholm declaration on the human environment. Report of the United Nations conference on the human environment, Part I, Chapter I. Reprinted in International Legal Materials 11, 1416.
   Google Scholar
• UNECE. (1993). Guidelines on the ecosystem approach in water management, UN Doc. ECE/ENVWA/31, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• UNECE. (2009). Guidance on water and adaptation to climate change. Geneva: UNECE.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. T., Yoffe, S. B., & Giordano, M. (2003). International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5, 29–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfrum, R. (1990). Purposes and principles of international environmental law. German Yearbook of International Law, 33, 308.
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, P., Vinogradov, S., Allan, A., Jones, P., & Rieu-Clarke, A. (2005). Sharing transboundary waters – An integrated assessment of equitable entitlement: The legal assessment model (IHP-VI Technical Documents in Hydrology, No. 74).
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, P. (2014). The Yin and Yang of international water law: China’s transboundary water practice and the changing contours of state sovereignty. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 23(1), 67–75. doi:10.1111/reel.12069
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, P., & Chen, H. (2011). China’s ‘Soft-Path’ to transboundary water cooperation examined in the light of two un global water conventions – exploring the ‘Chinese Way’. Water Law, 22(6), 229–247.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Mackay, S., Xia, J., & Kennard, M. (2012). Classification of flow regimes for environmental flow assessment in regulated rivers: The Huai River Basin, China. River Research and Applications, 28(7), 989–1005. doi:10.1002/rra.1483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar