Disputes over territorial boundaries and diverging valuation languages: the Santurban hydrosocial highlands territory in Colombia

References

• Baletti, B. (2012). Ordenamento territorial: Neo-developmentalism and the struggle for territory in the lower Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 573–598. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.664139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baud, M., De Castro, F., & Hogenboom, B. (2011). Environmental governance in Latin America: Towards an integrative research agenda. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 90, 78–88.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A. (2009). Latin America: Contesting extraction, producing geographies. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 30, 7–12. doi:10.1111/sjtg.2009.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., Humphreys Bebbington, D., & Bury, J. (2010). Federating and defending: Water territory and extraction in the andes. In R. Boelens, D. H. Getches, & J. A. Guevara Gil (Eds.), Out of the mainstream: Water rights, politics and identity (pp. 307–328). London & Washington DC: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Bermúdez, A. (2013). Estos son los efectos de volver al viejo Código Minero. La Silla Vacia. 29 April 2013. http://lasillavacia.com/node/43892
   Google Scholar
• Bermúdez, A. (2014). La locomotora minera no despego pero ya tiene rieles. La Silla Vacia. 25 June 2014. http://lasillavacia.com/historia/la-locomotora-minera-no-despego-pero-ya-tiene-rieles-47981
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, R. (2014). Cultural politics and the hydrosocial cycle: Water, power and identity in the Andean Highlands. Geoforum, 57, 234–247. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, R., & Gelles, P. H. (2005). Cultural politics, communal resistance and identity in Andean irrigation development. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 24(3), 311–327. doi:10.1111/j.0261-3050.2005.00137.x
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., & Rodriguez-de-Francisco, J. C. (2014). Commoditizing water territories: The clash between Andean water rights cultures and payment for environmental services policies. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 25(3), 84–102. doi:10.1080/10455752.2013.876867
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., Swyngedouw, E., Vos, J., & Wester, F. (2016). Hydrosocial territories: A political ecology perspective. Water International, 41(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, R., & Zwarteveen, M. (2005). Prices and politics in Andean water reforms. Development and Change, 36(4), 735–758. doi:10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley, D. W. (Ed.). (1992). Making the commons work. Theory, practice and policy, San Francisco: Institute of Contemporary Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., & Perreault, T. (2009). Environmental governance. In: N. Castree et al. (Eds.). Companion to Environmental Geography (pp. 475–397). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Buitrago, E. (2012). Entre el Agua y el Oro: Tensiones y Reconfiguraciones Territoriales en el Municipio de Vetas. Santander, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., & Fletcher, R. (2015). Accumulation by conservation. New Political Economy, 20(2), 273–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., Sullivan, S., Neves, K., Igoe, J., & Brockington, D. (2012). Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 23(2), 4–30. doi:10.1080/10455752.2012.674149
   Google Scholar
• Cárdenas, J. C. (2009). Dilemas de lo Colectivo. Instituciones, pobreza y cooperación en el manejo local de los recursos de uso común. Bogotá: Uniandes.
   Google Scholar
• Cárdenas, J. C. (2011). Water and economy national meeting: Water, a heritage which circulates from hand to hand. Conference, Banco de la República, October 6–7. Retrieved from www.banrepcultural.org\\agua\\encuentro-videos.html
   Google Scholar
• Cárdenas, J. C. (2014). Discussion about delimiting the Santurban páramo. Conference, Andes University, Feb. 2. Retrieved from www.uniandes.edu.co\\noticias\\informacion-general\\santurban.
   Google Scholar
• Corredor, G. (2013). Locomotora minera vs. medio ambiente [Mining engine vs environment]. Dinero, August 8. Retrieved from http://www.dinero.com/pais/articulo/locomotora-minera-vs-medio-ambiente/181896
   Google Scholar
• Cremers, L., De Theije, M., & Kolen, J. (2012). Small scale gold mining in the Amazon Basin. Panorama from Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Peru, and Suriname. Cuaderno Series. Amsterdam: CEDLA.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, B., Lu, F., Ocampo-Raeder, C., Boelens, R., Dill, B., & Zwarteveen, M. (2014). Santa cruz declaration on the global water crisis. Water International, 39(2), 246–261. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.886936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Castro, F., Van Dijck, P., & Hogenboom, B. (2014). The extraction and conservation of natural resources in South America. Recent trends and challenges., Cuadernos del CEDLA, No. 27. Amsterdam: CEDLA.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, C. (2012). Gobernabilidad Minera: cronologÍas legislativas del subsuelo en Colombia. Bogotá: Centro de Pensamiento RAIZAL. Retrieved from: https://gobernabilidadminera.wordpress.com/
   Google Scholar
• Duarte-Abadía, B., Boelens, R., & Roa-Avendaño, T. (2015). Hydropower, encroachment and the re-patterning of hydrosocial territory: The case of Hidrosogamoso in Colombia. Human Organization, 74(3), 243–254. doi:10.17730/0018-7259-74.3.243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte-Abadía, B., & Roa-Avendaño, T. (2014). El dilema del páramo: Diferentes concepciones en un contexto de justicia hídrica. El caso del páramo de Santurban. Revista Javeriana, 150, 71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Echavarren, J. M. (2010). Conceptos para una sociología del paisaje. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Papers. Revista De Sociología, 95(4), 1107–1128.
   Google Scholar
• Eco Oro (2014). “Eco Oro announces boundaries of Páramo of Santurbán declared”. Retrieved from http://www.ecooro.com (December 22).
   Google Scholar
• Escobar. (2008). Territories of difference place, movements, life, redes. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2010). Una minga para el postdesarrollo: Lugar, medio ambiente y movimientos sociales en las transformaciones globales. Lima: Desde Abajo.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. (1998). The struggle for water. Politics, rationality, and identity in the American Southwest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farber, S. C., Costanza, R., & Wilson, M. A. (2002). Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41, 375–392. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00088-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, B. M. (2005). Movimientos socioterritoriales y movimientos socioespaciales. Contribución teórica para una lectura geográfica de los movimientos sociales. Buenos Aires: Clacso.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, T., & Johnson, C. (2014). Elinor Ostrom’s legacy: Governing the commons and the rational choice controversy. Development and Change, 45(5), 1093–1110. doi:10.1111/dech.12110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1978. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972 - 1978. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, B. M. (2013). Characterization and analysis of production systems in Guerrero, Rabanal and Santurban páramos. ‘Páramos and life system project’. Alexander von Humboldt Institute, Bogotá. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Garay, L. (2013). Globalización/ Glocalización soberanía y gobernanza. A propósito del cambio climático y extractivismo minero. In V. Saldarriaga., O. Alarcon., & R. Medina (Eds.), Minería en Colombia: Fundamentos para superar el modelo extractivista (pp. 9–19). Imprenta Nacional: Contraloría General de la Republica.
   Google Scholar
• Goff, M., & Crow, B. (2014). What is water equity? The unfortunate consequences of a global focus on ‘drinking water’. Water International, 39(2), 159–171. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.886355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2009). Perspectivas del conocimiento ecológico local ante el proceso de globalización. Papeles De Relaciones Ecosociales Y Cambio Global, 7, 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Hogenboom, B. (2012). Depoliticized and Repoliticized minerals in Latin America. Journal of Developing Societies, 28(2), 133–158. doi:10.1177/0169796X12448755
   Google Scholar
• Hoogesteger, J., Boelens, R., & Baud, M. (2016). Territorial pluralism: Water users’ multi-scalar struggles against state ordering in Ecuador’s highlands. Water International, 41(1), 91–106. doi:10.1080/02508060.2016.1130910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado, R. (2010, December 20). Páramo de Santurban: El agua o el oro. In Revista Semana, Bogotá. Retrieved 23 February 2013 from http://www.semana.com/nacion/articulo/el-agua-oro-saturban/334294-3
   Google Scholar
• Lu, F., Ocampo-Raeder, C., Crow, B., & Romano, S. (2014). Equitable water governance: Future directions in the understanding and analysis of water inequities in the global South. Water International, 39(2), 129–142. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.896540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Alier, J. (2004). Los conflictos ecólogicos distributivos y los indicadores de sustentabilidad. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, 1, 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment (MMA). (2001). Program for the sustainable management and restoration of Colombian high land ecosystems: Páramos. Bogotá: General Direction of Ecosystems.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development (2014). Resolution 2090 “Through which it delimits the Paramo’s jurisdictions - Santurbán-Berlin”. www.minambiente.gov.co/index.php/normativa/resoluciones
   Google Scholar
• Molano, J. (2012). Las Altas Montañas Ecuatoriales de Colombia: Reflexiones y apuestas para su defensa y continuidad. Unpublished paper presented at the meeting of the Geography Society of Colombia. Bogotá, 20 September 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mollinga, P. (2001). Water and politics: Levels, rational choice and south indian canal irrigation. Futures, 33, 733–752. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00016-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1990). The rational choice paradigm and the allocation of agricultural development resources. Development and Change, 21, 225–246. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.1990.tb00376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murra, J. (1972). El “control vertical” de un máximo de pisos ecológicos en la economía de las sociedades Andinas. In I. Ortiz De Zúñiga (Ed.), Visita de la provincia de Léon de Huánuco en 1562 (pp. 429–476). Peru: Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, A. (1990). Comer y ser comido. Los animales en la tradición oral U’WA (Tunebo). Boletín Museo Del Oro, 26. www.banrepcultural.org\\node\\26017
   Google Scholar
• Osejo, A. (2014)Characterization of actors’ relations and their positioning in regards to use, management and conservation of the Santurban Páramo. ‘Páramos and life system project’. Alexander von Humboldt Institute, Bogotá.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009). Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Nobel Prize Lecture, 8 December 2009, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Penna, J. L., & Cristeche, E. (2008). La valoración de servicios ambientales: Diferentes paradigmas. Argentina: Publicaciones Nacionales INTA.
   Google Scholar
• Perreault, T. (2014). What kind of governance for what kind of equity? Towards a theorization of justice in water governance. Water International, 39(2), 233–245. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.886843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintero, F. (2014). Cebolleros de Santurban se resisten a dejar de cultivar. En El Tiempo. Mayo, 2 de 2014. www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/CMS-13918957
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. (2004). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-de-Francisco, J. C., & Boelens, R. (2014). Payment for environmental services and power in the Chamachán Watershed, Ecuador. Human Organization, 73(4), 351–362. doi:10.17730/humo.73.4.b680w75u27527061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-de-Francisco, J. C., & Boelens, R. (2016). PES hydrosocial territories: De-territorialization and re-patterning of water control arenas in the Andean highlands. Water International, 41(1), 140–156. doi:10.1080/02508060.2016.1129686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-de-Francisco, J. C., Budds, J., & Boelens, R. (2013). Payment for environmental services and unequal resource control in Pimampiro, Ecuador. Society & Natural Resources, 26, 1217–1233. doi:10.1080/08941920.2013.825037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldías, C., Boelens, R., Wegerich, K., & Speelman, S. (2012). Losing the watershed focus: A look at complex community-managed irrigation systems in Bolivia. Water International, 37(7), 744–759. doi:10.1080/02508060.2012.733675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 517–540. doi:10.1080/0964401042000229025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The political economy and political ecology of the hydro-social cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 142, 56–60. doi:10.1111/jcwr.2009.142.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2014). ‘Not A Drop of Water…’: State, Modernity and the production of nature in Spain, 1898–2010. Environment and History, 20, 67–92. doi:10.3197/096734014X13851121443445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulloa, A. (2002). La discusión antropológica en torno a la naturaleza, la ecología y el medio ambiente. In G. Palacio & A. Ulloa (Eds.), Repensando la Naturaleza. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Ungar, P., Osejo, A., Roldán., L., & Buitrago, E. (2014). Caracterización del sistema social asociado al territorio. In C. Sarmiento & P. Ungar (Eds.), Aportes a la delimitación del paramo mediante la identificación de los limites inferiores del ecosistema a escala 1:25.000 y analisis del sistema social asociado al territorio: Complejo de páramos Jurisdicciones-Santurbán-Berlín. Bogotá, D.C.: Instituto Alexander von Humboldt.
   Google Scholar
• Vallejo, G. ((2014,). Delimitan 98.954 hectáreas del páramo de Santurbán. Conference, December 12, Sostenibilidad Semana.com.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, J. (2010). Nuevos Campesinos. Campesinos e imperios alimentarios. Barcelona: Icaria.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, J., & Boelens, R. (2014). Sustainability standards and the water question. Development and Change, 45(2), 205–230. doi:10.1111/dech.12083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwarteveen, M., & Boelens, R. (2014). Defining, researching and struggling for water justice: Some conceptual building blocks for research and action. Water International, 39(2), 143–158. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.891168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar