The Babel Fish Toolkit: Understanding and Using Behavioural Mechanisms and Interventions in Landscape Planning

References

• Achenbach, J. (2015): The age of disbelief. National Geographic, 227, pp. 30–47.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, C.; Zimmermann, T.; Knieling, J.; v. Haaren, C. (2012): Social learning can benefit decisionmaking in landscape planning: Gartow case study on climate change adaptation, Elbe valley biosphere reserve. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105 (4), pp. 347–360. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely, D. (2015): Behavioral Economics: An Exercise in Design and Humility. In Samson, A. (ed.), The Behavioral Economics Guide, pp.V-X. Available online: http://www.behavioraleconomics.com (accessed May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• ASLA (American Society for Landscape Architects) (2013): GLOSSARY Landscape Architecture Terms. Available online: https://www.asla.org/nonmembers/publicrelations/glossary.htm (accessed January 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (ed.) (2015): Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, S. (2003): Strategies for sustainability: citizens and responsible environmental behavior. Area, 35 (3), pp. 227–240. doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F.; Vohs, K. D. (2007): Self Regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1 (1), pp.115–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00001.x
   Google Scholar
• Behavioural Insights Team UK (2015–16): Update report 2015–16. Available online: http://www.behaviouralinsights.co.uk (accessed March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Beniers, K. J.; Dur, R. (2007): Politician’s motivation, political culture and electoral competition. International Tax and Public Finance, 14 (1), pp. 29–54. doi: 10.1007/s10797-006-8878-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderone, N. (2015): Market value of crops pollinated by honeybees. In Mann, C. C., Quest for a superbee. National Geographic, 227, p. 94.
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. (2014): Behavioral economics. Current Biology, 24, pp. 867–871. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F.; Hare, T. A. (2014): The Neural Basis of Strategic Choice. In Glimcher, P. W. (ed.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain, 2nd edition. Amsterdam: Academic Press, pp. 479–492.
   Google Scholar
• Chahoud, A. (2010): Blicke hinter die Kulissen: Aus dem “Alltag” eines Politikberaters. Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 19 (2010), pp. 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Chance, D. R. (2007): A behavioral theory of planning. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2011): Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe (2000): European Landscape Convention. European Treaty Series 176. Available online: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/0900001680080621 (accessed March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Coyne, C. J.; Leeson, P. T. (2008): How Do Rulers Choose? Dual Domains of Discretion in Political Decision Making. Journal of Economic Issues, 42 (39), pp. 727–743. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2008.11507176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, G. C. (1997): Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S.; Dilley, L.; Crawford, J. (2014): Energy consumption behaviour: rational or habitual? disP – The Planning Review, 50 (3), pp.11–19. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2014.979039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, P.; Hallsworth, M.; Halpern, D.; King, D.; Vlaev, I. (2010): MINDSPACE: Influencing Behaviour through Public Policy. London: Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenegger, C.; Haushofer, J.; Fehr, E. (2011): The role of testosterone in social interaction. Trends in cognitive sciences, 15 (6), pp. 263–271. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garri, I. (2010): Political short-termism: a possible explanation. Public Choice, 145 (1–2), pp. 197–211. doi: 10.1007/s11127-009-9561-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer, C.; Luhmann, N. (2013): Niklas Luhmann. Die Knappheit der Zeit und die Vordringlichkeit des Befristeten. Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos.
   Google Scholar
• Goebbert, K.; Jenkins-Smith, H. C.; Klockow, K.; Nowlin, M. C.; Silva, C. L. (2012): Weather, Climate, and Worldviews: The Sources and Consequences of Public Perceptions of Changes in Local Weather Patterns. Weather, Climate, and Society, 4 (2), pp. 132–144. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-11-00044.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt, T.; Veit, S.; Fleischer, J. (2010): Wissen ist Macht? Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 19 (2010), pp. 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Jakob, M.; Kübler, D.; Steckel, J.C.; van Veldhuizen, R. (2017): Clean up your own mess: An experimental study of moral responsibility and efficiency. Journal of Public Economics, 155 (2017), pp.138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2013): Making climate-science communication evidence-based – all the way down. In Crow, D. A.; Boykoff, M. T. (eds.) (2014), Culture, Politics and Climate Change. New York: Routledge, pp. 203–220.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2015): Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Political Psychology, 36 (S1), pp.1–43. doi: 10.1111/pops.12244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M.; Peters, E.; Wittlin, M.; Slovic, P.; Ouellette, L. L.; Braman, D.; Mandel, G. (2012): The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2 (10), pp. 732–735. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011): Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann-Hayoz, R.; Defila, R.; Di Giulio, A.; Winkelmann, M. (2016): Zur außerwissenschaftlichen Wirkung transdisziplinärer Projekte. In Defila, R.; Di Giulio, A. (eds.), Transdisziplinär forschen – zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen. Frankfurt a. M., New York: Campus Verlag, pp. 239–330.
   Google Scholar
• Krockow, Ch. G. v. (1992): Die Deutschen in ihrem Jahrhundert. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, S. K.; Han, H. (2014): Behavioral Planning Theory. In Wang, J. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Business Analytics and Optimization. Hershey (PA): IGI Global, pp. 265–272.
   Google Scholar
• Leif, T. (2010): Von der Symbiose zur Systemkrise. Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 19 (2010), pp. 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Leitão, A. B.; Ahern, J. (2002): Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59 (2), pp. 65–93. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00005-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, J.; Milgrom, P. (2004): Introduction to choice theory. Available online: http://web.stanford.edu/~jdlevin/Econ%20202/Choice%20Theory.pdf (accessed March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, A.; Appleton, K.; v. Haaren, C.; Warren, B. (2015): Using 3D visualization methods in landscape planning: An evaluation of options and practical issues. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, pp. 85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnus, P. D. (2008): Regarding scientific significance. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Naturkapital Deutschland – TEEB-DE (2016): Ökosystemleistungen in ländlichen Räumen – Grundlage für menschliches Wohlergehen und nachhaltige wirtschaftliche Entwicklung. Hannover, Leipzig: Leibniz Universität Hannover, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umwelforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, F.; von Haaren, C.; Albert, C. (2018): Assessing and coping with uncertainties in landscape planning: an overview. Landscape Ecology, June 2018 (33) 6, pp. 861–878. doi: 10.1007/s10980-018-0643-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Riordan, T. (ed.) (1995): Perceiving Environmental Risks. Readings in Environmental Psychology. London, San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD Working Party on Integrating Environmental and Economic Policies (2012): An Inventory of Examples in Behavioural Economics which are Relevant for Environmental Policy Design. ENV/ EPOC/WPIEEP, (2012) 17.
   Google Scholar
• Ogrin, D. (2010): Quo vadis, topos europaeus? Landscape, 21 (2010), pp. 63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Palmas, C.; Siewert, A.; von Haaren, C. (2015a): Exploring the decision-space for renewable energy generation to enhance spatial efficiency. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 52, pp. 9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmas, C.; Siewert, A.; Dossola, F.; von Haaren, C.; Rode, M. (2015b): Smart spatial. In Hofmann, L.; Sonnenschein, M. (eds.), Smart-Nord – Final Report. Hannover: Druckerei Hartmann GmbH, pp. 235–258.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2016): Chapter 4, Happiness und Sustainable Development: Concepts end Evidence. In Helliwell, J.; Layard, R.; Sachs, J. (eds.), World Happiness Report 2016, Update (Vol. I). New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network, pp. 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Samson, A. (ed.) (2015): The Behavioral Economics Guide 2015 (with an introduction by Dan Ariely). Available online: http://www. behavioraleconomics.com (accessed May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Sell, J. L.; Zube, E. H. (1986): Perception of and response to environmental change. Journal of architectural and planning research, 1986, pp. 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Shogren, J. (2012): Behavioural Economics and Environmental Incentives. OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 49. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shughart II, W. F. (2006): Katrinanomics: The politics and economics of disaster relief. Public Choice, 127 (1–2), pp. 31–53. doi: 10.1007/s11127-006-7731-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solek, A. (2014): Behavioral economics approaches to public policy. Journal of International Studies, 7 (2), pp. 33–45. doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.2014/7-2/3
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, V. (2016): Planet ohne Affen? Zur Zukunft unserer Mitprimaten. In Haber, W.; Held, M.; Vogt, M. (eds.), Die Welt im Anthropozän Erkundungen im Spannungsfeld zwischen Ökologie und Humanität. München: oekom, pp. 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Staud, T. (2017): Direkte Konfrontation mit Klimaschutzgegnern kann unerwünschte Wirkungen haben. Available online: https://www.kl imafakten.de/meldung/di rektekonfrontation-mit-klimaschutzgegnern-kannunerwuenschte-wirkungen-haben (accessed 12 March 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2014): Why nudge?: The politics of libertarian paternalism. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TEEB (2010): The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Ecological and Economic Foundations. Edited by Pushpam Kumar. London, Washington: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H.; Sunstein, C. (2009): Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and loss aversion. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Umweltbundesamt (2016): Verhaltensökonomische Erkenntnisse für die Gestaltung umweltpolitischer Instrumente. Umweltbundesamt Texte 83/2016. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt.
   Google Scholar
• von Haaren, C.; Warren-Kretzschmar, B.; Milos, C.; Wertmann, C. (2014): Opportunities for design approaches in landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 130, pp.159–170. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. (2006): Erst denken, dann handeln? Wissenschaftliche Politikberatung aus der Perspektive der Wissens(chaft)soziologie. In Rehfeld, D.; Römmele, A.; Thunert, M. (eds.), Handbuch Politikberatung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 35–44. doi: 10.1007/978-3-531-90052-0_4
   Google Scholar
• Wende, W.; Wojtkiewicz, W.; Marschall, I.; Heiland, S.; Lipp, T.; Reinke, M.; Schaal, P.; Schmidt, C. (2011): Putting the Plan into Practice: Implementation of Proposals for Measures of Local Landscape Plans. Landscape Research, 37 (4), pp. 483–500. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2011.592575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilholt, T. (2009): Bias and Values in Scientific Research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 40 (1), pp. 92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C.; Dowlatabadi, H. (2007): Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, pp.169–203. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.053006.141137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoeli, E.; Budescu, D. V.; Carrico, A. R.; Delmas, M. A.; DeShazo, J. R.; Ferraro, P. J.; Forster, H. A.; Kunreuther, H.; Larrick, R. P.; Lubell, M.; Markowitz, E. M.; Tonn, B.; Vandenbergh, M. P.; Weber, E. U. (2017): Behavioral science tools to strengthen energy & environmental policy. Behavioral Science & Policy, 3 (1), pp. 69–79. doi: 10.1353/bsp.2017.0006
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1949): Human behaviour and the principle of least effort. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar