References
- Argyrou, A.; Hummels, H. (2019): Legal personality and economic livelihood of the Whanganui River: a call for community entrepreneurship. Water International, 44 (6–7), pp. 752–768. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1643525
- Banville, M-S., Torres, J. (2017): On embracing an immanent ethics in urban planning: Pursuing our Body-without-Organs. Planning Theory, 16 (3), pp. 255–274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215625707
- Beauregard, R. (2015): Planning matter: Acting with things. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
- Bennett, J. (2010): Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Bridge, G. (2000): Rationality, ethics, and space: On situated universalism and the self-interested acknowledgement of ‘difference’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18 (4), pp. 519–535. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/d204t
- Bogost, I. (2012): Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Bryant, L. (2011a): The Ethics of the Event: Deleuze and Ethics without Αρχή. In Jun, N.; Smith, D. W. (eds.), Deleuze and Ethics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 21–43.
- Bryant, L. (2011b): The Democracy of Objects. Ann Harbor: Open Humanities Press.
- Bryant, L. (2014): Onto-Cartography: An Ontology of machines and Media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Davoudi, S. (2015): Planning as practice of knowing. Planning Theory, 14 (3), pp. 316–331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215575919
- Delanda, M. (2006): A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity, London: Continuum.
- Deleuze, G. (1983): Nietzsche and Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Deleuze, G. (1988): Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
- Deleuze G. and Guattari F. (1987) [1980]: A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Athlone Press.
- Deleuze, G. (1995): Negotiations, 1972–1990, New York: Columbia University Press.
- Flyvbjerg, B. (2001): Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Freestone, R. (2000): Learning from planning’s histories. In Freestone R. (ed.), Urban Planning in a Changing World. London: Routledge, pp.1–15.
- Fraser, N. (2009): Who counts? Dilemmas of justice in a postwestphalian world. Antipode, 41 (s1), pp. 281–297.
- Gilligan, C. (1982): In A Different Voice, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
- Gilson, E. (2011): Responsive Becoming: Ethics between Deleuze and Feminism. In Jun, N.; Smith, D. W. (eds.), Deleuze and Ethics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 63–88.
- Gunder, M. (2004): Shaping the planner’s egoideal: A Lacanian interpretation of planning education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23 (3), pp. 299–311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X03261284
- Gunder, M. (2006): Sustainability: Planning’s Saving Grace or Road to Perdition? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26 (2), pp. 208–221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X06289359
- Gunder, M. (2011): Commentary: Is Urban Design Still Urban Planning? An Exploration and Response. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 30 (4), pp. 184–195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X10393358
- Gunder, M. (2014): Fantasy in Planning Organisations and their Agency: The Promise of Being at Home in the World. Urban Policy and Research, 32 (1), pp.1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2013.835261
- Gunder, M., Hillier, J. (2009): Planning in Ten Words or Less: A Lacanian Entanglement with Spatial Planning. Farnham: Ashgate.
- Heidegger, M. (1977): The Question Concerning Technology. In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, New York: Garland, pp. 3–35.
- Hillier, J. (2011): Strategic Navigation across multiple planes: towards a Deleuzian-inspired methodology for strategic spatial planning. Town Planning Review, 82 (5), pp. 503–527. doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2011.30
- Hillier, J. (2015): Throwing Dice: Between Contingency and Necessity in Spatial Planning. In Hillier, J.; Metzger, J. (eds.), Exploring Contemporary Planning Theory and Practice with Patsy Healey. Farnham: Ashgate.
- Hillier, J., Abrahams G. (2013): Deleuze and Guattari: Jean Hillier in conversation with Gareth Abrahams. AESOP Young Academic Network, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/23d6/4182b25ca53bb39b51d93cb902b87bd7081f.pdf (accessed 17 June 2020).
- Jacobs, J. (2002): Dimensions of Moral Theory: An Introduction to Metaethics and Moral Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Jon, I. (2020a): Deciphering posthumanism: Why and how it matters to urban planning in the Anthropocene. Planning Theory, online: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474095220912770, pp.1–29.
- Jon, I. (2020b): A manifesto for planning after the coronavirus: Towards planning of care. Planning Theory, online: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095220931272, pp.1–17.
- Kant, I. (1987): The Critique of Judgement. Indianapolis: Hackett.
- Marcuse, P. (1976): Professional ethics and beyond: values in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 42 (3), pp. 264–274.
- Metzger, J. (2020): A more-than-human approach to environmental planning. In Davoudi, S.; Cowell, R.; White, I.; Blanco, H. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Environmental Planning. London: Routledge, pp. 190–199.
- Meyerson, M.; Banfield, E. (1955): Politics, Planning, and the Public Interest: The Case of Public Housing in Chicago. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.
- Mignolo, W. (2000): The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. South Atlantic Quarterly, 101 (1), pp. 57–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-101-1-57
- Mignolo, W. (2009): Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26 (7–8), pp.159–181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
- Quijano, A. (2007): Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21 (2), pp.168–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353
- Rawls, J. (1971): A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Rawls, J. (2001): Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Rittel, H., Webber, M. (1973): Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4 (2), pp. 155–169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
- Rogers, C. (2017): A new approach to protecting ecosystems: The Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017. Environmental Law Review, 19 (4), pp. 266–279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461452917744909
- Stein, S.; Harper, T. (2005): Rawls’ justice and fairness: A moral basis for contemporary planning theory. Planning Theory, 4 (2), pp.147–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095205054603
- Van Brussel, S., Boelens, L., Lauwers, D. (2016): Unravelling the Flemish Mobility Orgware: the transition towards a sustainable mobility from an actor-network perspective. European Planning Studies, 24 (7), pp.1336–1356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1169248
- Van Wezemael, J. (2018): Assemblage Thinking in Planning Theory. In Gunder, M.; Madanipour, A.; Watson, V. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. New York: Routledge, pp. 326–336.
- Watson, V. (2006): Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics. Planning Theory, 5 (1), pp. 31–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095206061020
- Winkler, T., Duminy, J. (2016): Planning to change the world? Questioning the normative ethics of planning theories. Planning Theory, 15 (2), pp. 111–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214551113