Internet keyword advertising and consumer search intentions: The mediating effects of advertising attitude and keyword perception

References

• Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W., Structural equation modeling in practice A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103(3), 1988, pp. 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, M. J. and Churchill, G. A., The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14(2), 1977, pp. 538–555.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A., The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51(6), 1986, pp. 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartos, R. and Dunn, T., Advertising and consumers: New perspectives. New York: American Association of Advertising Agencies, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W. and Engel, J. F., Consumer Behavior, Orlando Florida, Dryden Press. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. and Stine, R., “Bootstrapping goodness of fit measures in structural equation models”. Soc. Method. Res., Vol. 21(2), 1992, pp. 205–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brackett, L. K. and Carr, B. N., “Cyberspace Advertising vs. Other Media: Consumer vs. Mature Student Attitudes”. Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 41(5), 2001, pp. 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducoffe, R. H., “How consumers assess the value of advertising”. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol. 17(1), 1995, pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C. and Larcker, D., Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res., Vol. 18(1), 1981, pp. 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., Lorange, P. and Roos, J., “The cooperative venture formation process: A latent variable structural modeling approach”. Manag. Sci., Vol. 36(10), 1990, pp. 1246–1255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, M. P., Mitchell, A. A. and Russo, J. E., “Low Involvement Strategies for Processing Advertisements”. Journal of Advertising, Vol. 14(2), 1985, pp. 4–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal, D., Gotlieb, J. and Marmorstein, H., The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21(1), 1994, pp. 145–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, L., “Observations: Advertising Clutter in Consumer Magazines: Dimensions and Effects”. Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 36(4), 1996, pp. 76–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jau-Shyong Wang, Yen-Fen Cheng and Yi-Ling Chu., “Effect of Celebrity Endorsements on Consumer Purchase Intentions: Advertising Effect and Advertising Appeal as Mediators”, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 2012, pp. 357–367.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation, and control, 9th ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Lavidge, RJ. and Steiner, C. A., A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 25(4), 1961, pp. 59–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, R. J., Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the Ad: A Conceptual Framework. In Alwitt, L. F. and Mitchell, A. A. (Eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects. 1985, pp. 45–63.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, S. B. Lutz, R. J. and Belch, G. E., The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 23(5), 1986, pp. 130–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, A., Advertising attitudes and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 40(3), 2000, pp. 67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. A. and Olson, J. C., Are product attitude beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude?. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18(17), 1981, pp. 318–332.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. M. and Hunt, S. D., The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58(3), 1994, pp. 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A., “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models.”. Information Systems Research, Vol. 6(2), 1995, pp. 144–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. H., Craig-Lees, M., Hecker, R. and Francis, H., Technologyenabled service delivery: an investigation of reasons affecting customer adoption and rejection. International Journal of Service in Dustry Management, Vol. 13(1), 2002, pp. 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Wixom, B. H. and Watson, H. J., An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25(1), 2001, pp. 17–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold, H., Estimation of principal components and related methods by iterative least squares. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Multivariate Analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1966, pp. 391–420.
   Google Scholar
• Wold, H., Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. in K.G. Joreskog and H. Wold (Eds.), Systems Under Indirect Observation, Part II. Amsterdam: North Holland Press. 1982.
   Google Scholar