References
- Amirteimoori, H., Amirteimoori, A., and Amirteimoori, A. (2018). Sustainability assessment in the presence of undesirable factors over time: A case on gas companies. Expert Systems, e12316.
- Badiezadeh, T., Saen, R. F., and Samavati, T. (2018). Assessing sustainability of supply chains by double frontier network DEA: A big data approach. Computers & Operations Research, 98, 284-290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2017.06.003
- Chen, Y., Cook, WD., Li, N., and Zhu, J. (2009b). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal Research, 196, 1170-6.
- Färe, R. and Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34, 35-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00012-9
- Färe, R., and Grosskopf, S. (2003). Nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(4), 1070-1074. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00510
- Fukuyama, H., and Weber, W. L. (2010). A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs. Omega, 38(5), 398-409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.10.006
- Galán-Martín, Á., Guillén-Gosálbez, G., Stamford, L., and Azapagic, A. (2016). Enhanced data envelopment analysis for sustainability assessment: A novel methodology and application to electricity technologies. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 90, 188-200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.04.022
- Ge, H., and Yang, S. Y. (2017). Study on the R&D performance of high-tech industry in China-based on data envelopment analysis. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 20(3), 909-920. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2017.1358890
- Haghighi, S. M., Torabi, S. A., and Ghasemi, R. (2016). An integrated approach for performance evaluation in sustainable supply chain networks (with a case study). Journal of cleaner production, 137, 579-597. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.119
- Hailu, A., and Veeman, T. S. (2001). Non-parametric productivity analysiswithundesirableoutputs: anapplicationtothe Canadianpulp and paper industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 605-616. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00181
- Halkos, G. E., Tzeremes, N. G., and Kourtzidis, S. A. (2015). Regional sustainability efficiency index in Europe: an additive two-stage DEA approach. Operational Research, 15(1), 1-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-015-0170-4
- Izadikhah, M., and Saen, R. F. (2018). Assessing sustainability of supply chains by chance-constrained two-stage DEA model in the presence of undesirable factors. Computers & Operations Research, 100, 343-367. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2017.10.002
- Jablonsky, J. (2016). Efficiency analysis in multi-period systems: an application to performance evaluation in Czech higher education. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 24(2), 283-296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0401-z
- Kalantary, M., and Saen, R. F. (2019). Assessing sustainability of supply chains: An inverse network dynamic DEA model. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 1224-1238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.009
- Kao, C., and Hwang, S-N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185, 418-429. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041
- Kao, C., and Hwang, S. N. (2014). Multi-period efficiency and Malmquist productivity index in two-stage production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 232(3), 512-521. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.030
- Kao, C., and Liu, S. T. (2014). Multi-period efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis: The case of Taiwanese commercial banks. Omega, 47, 90-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.001
- Kuosmanen, T. (2005). Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis with undesirable outputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(4), 1077-1082. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00788.x
- Khodakarami, M., Shabani, A., Saen, R. F., and Azadi, M. (2015). Developing distinctive two-stage data envelopment analysis models: An application in evaluating the sustainability of supply chain management. Measurement, 70, 62-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.03.024
- Liang, L., Cook, WD., and Zhu, J. (2008). DEA models for two-stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics, 55, 643-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20308
- Liu, W., Zhou, Z., Ma, C., Liu, D., and Shen, W. (2015). Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs. Omega, 56, 74-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.03.009
- Lozano, S., Gutiérrez, E., and Moreno, P. (2013). Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(4), 1665-1676. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.04.041
- Maghbouli, M., Amirteimoori, A., and Kordrostami, S. (2014). Two-stage network structures with undesirable outputs: A DEA based approach. Measurement, 48, 109-118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.10.032
- Seiford, L. M., and Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management science, 45(9), 1270-1288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.9.1270
- Seiford, L. M., and Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European journal of operational research, 142(1), 16-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00293-4
- Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of cost and production functions Princeton University press. Princeton, New Jersey.
- Tajbakhsh, A., and Hassini, E. (2015). A data envelopment analysis approach to evaluate sustainability in supply chain network. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 74-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.054
- Tajbakhsh, A., and Shamsi, A. (2019). Sustainability performance of countries matters: A non-parametric index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 506-522. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.189
- Tone, k., and Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slack-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 243-252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.027
- Tone, K., and Tsutsui, M. (2014). Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 42(1), 124-131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.04.002
- Wu, J., Zhu, Q., Chu, J., and Liang, L. (2015). Two-stage network structures with undesirable intermediate outputs reused: A DEA based approach. Computational Economics, 46(3), 455-477. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-015-9498-3
- Xiong, Y., Li, Z., and Fang, X. (2017). Performance evaluation of introducing group technology into machining industry with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 20(1), 295-305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2016.1258834
- Zhao, L., Zha, Y., Zhuang, Y., and Liang, L. (2019). Data envelopment analysis for sustainability evaluation in China: Tackling the economic, environmental, and social dimensions. European Journal of Operational Research, 275(3), 1083-1095. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.004
- Zhou, H., and Hu, H. (2017). Sustainability evaluation of railways in China using a two-stage network DEA model with undesirable outputs and shared resources. Sustainability, 9(1), 150. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010150
- Zhou, H., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2018). Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins, development and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(1), 1-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.023