Mediated multinational urbanism: a Johannesburg exemplar

References

• Alinsky, S. 1971. Rules for Radicals: A Practitioner’s Primer for Realistic Radicals. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 2006. “The Good City.” Urban Studies 43 (5–6): 1009–1023.10.1080/00420980600676717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R., and K. N. Cissna. 2008. “Fresh Perspectives in Dialogue Theory.” Communication Theory 18 (1): 1–4.10.1111/comt.2008.18.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 2011. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy (1990).” Cultural Theory: An Anthology 2011: 282–295.
   Google Scholar
• Bénit-Gbaffou, C. 2006. “Police-community Partnerships and Responses to Crime: Lessons from Yeoville and Observatory, Johannesburg.” Urban Forum 17 (4): 301–326.
   Google Scholar
• Bénit-Gbaffou, C., and O. Katsaura. 2014. “Community Leadership and the Construction of Political Legitimacy: Unpacking Bourdieu's ‘Political Capital’ in Post-Apartheid Johannesburg.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (5): 1807–1832.10.1111/ijur.2014.38.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenschot, W. 2010. “Everyday Mediation: The Politics of Public Service Delivery in Gujarat, India.” Development and Change 41 (5): 883–905.10.1111/dech.2010.41.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, L. W. 2008. “Deliberation, Storytelling, and Dialogic Moments.” Communication Theory 18 (1): 93–116.10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosmak, L. 2000. “Citizenship Denationalised.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 7 (2): 447–509.
   Google Scholar
• Caldeira, T. P. R. 2000. City of Walls: Crime, Segregation and Citizenship in Sao Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chipkin, I., and S. Meny-Gibert. 2013. “Introduction: New and Contemporary Spaces in South Africa.” Social Dynamics 39 (2): 151–158.10.1080/02533952.2013.796126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipkin, I., and B. Ngqulunga. 2008. “Friends and Family: Social Cohesion in South Africa.” Journal of Southern African Studies 34 (1): 61–76.10.1080/03057070701832882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. 2004. “The Habermasian Public Sphere: A Specification of the Idealized Conditions of Democratic Communication.” Studies in Social and Political Thought 2004 (10): 2–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. 2005. “The Habermasian Public Sphere: Taking Difference Seriously?” Theory and Society 34 (2): 111–136.10.1007/s11186-005-0155-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Arts and Culture (South Africa). 2011. Creating a Caring and Proud Society: A National Strategy for Developing an Inclusive and a Cohesive South African Society. Pretoria: Department of Arts and Culture, South Africa. Accessed February 21, 2014. http://www.dac.gov.za/publications/reports/NATIONAL-STRATEGY-SOCIAL-COHESION-2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. 2003. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics and Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1981. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1. Reasons and the Rationalisation of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2001. On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in the Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, M. R. 2003. “Communicative Action, Strategic Action, and Inter-Group Dialogue.” European Journal of Political Theory 2 (2): 157–182.10.1177/147488510322003
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. 1991. “Habermas on Strategic and Communicative Action.” Political Theory 19 (2): 181–201.10.1177/0090591791019002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsaura, O. 2012. “Community Governance in Urban South Africa: Spaces of Political Contestation and Coalition.” Urban Forum 23 (3): 319–342.10.1007/s12132-011-9138-5
   Google Scholar
• Katsaura, O. 2014. “Contours of Urban Community Politics: Learning From Johannesburg.” In Urban Governance in Post-Aparthied Cities: Modes of Engagement in South Africa’s Metropoles, edited by C. Haferburg and M. Huchzermeyer, 101–116. Stuttgart: Gebruder Borntraeger.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, L. B., and I. Freemantle. 2010. “Tactical Cosmopolitanism and Idioms of Belonging: Insertion and Self-Exclusion in Johannesburg.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36 (3): 375–390.10.1080/13691830903494901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, D. M. 2013. “Living Together Separately in South Africa.” Social Dynamics 39 (2): 258–262.10.1080/02533952.2013.796125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misago, J. P. 2011. “Disorder in a Changing Society.” In Exorcising the Demons Within: Xenophobia, Violence and Statecraft in Contemporary South Africa, edited by L. B. Landau, 89–108. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J., and T. Marsden. 1995. “The Spatialization of Politics: Local and National Actor-Spaces in Environmental Conflict.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 20 (3): 368–380.10.2307/622657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neocosmos, M. 2008. “The Politics of Fear and the Fear of Politics: Reflections on Xenophobic Violence in South Africa.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 43 (6): 586–594.10.1177/0021909608096655
   Google Scholar
• Nyamnjoh, F. B. 2010. “Racism, Ethnicity and the Media in Africa: Reflections Inspired by Studies of Xenophobia in Cameroun and South Africa.” Africa Spectrum 45 (1): 57–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay, S. 2008. “Crime, Community and the Governance of Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa.” Politikon 35 (2): 141–158.10.1080/02589340802366943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulos, C. N. 2008. “Accidental Dialogue.” Communication Theory 18 (1): 117–138.10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00316.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D. 2013. “Negotiated Denizenship: Foreign Nationals’ Tactics of Belonging in a Cape Town Township.” Social Dynamics 39 (3): 520–535.10.1080/02533952.2013.852354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithers, M. 2014. Re-Imagining Post-Apartheid Yeoville Bellevue: The Journey and Reflections of a Resident Activist/activist Resident. Report Series Produced by the South African Research Chair in Development Planning and Modelling, School of Architecture and Planning. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. 2007. “Super-diversity and its Implications.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (6): 1024–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2008. Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Worby, E., S. Hassim, and T. Kupe, eds. 2008. Go Home or Die Here: Violence, Xenophobia and the Reinvention of Difference in South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zolberg, A. R. 2000. “The Dawn of Cosmopolitan Denizenship.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 7 (2): 511–518.
   Google Scholar