234
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Speaking for the trees: a study of the relationship between discourse, power and organisational culture in competing constructions of nature

&

References

  • Benn, G. 2008. City of Cape Town BioNet. Terrestrial Systematic Conservation Plan Re-analysis. Unpublished report, City of Cape Town.
  • Boholm, M. 2016. “Risk, Language and Discourse.” PhD diss., Stockholm University.
  • Byrne, J., and J. Wolch. 2009. “Nature, Race and Parks: Past Research and Future Directions for Geographic Research.” Progress in Human Geography 33 (6): 743–765. doi:10.1177/0309132509103156.
  • Cashmore, M., and T. Richardson. 2013. “Power and Environmental Assessment: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 39: 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.08.002.
  • Cronon, W. 1996. “The Trouble with Wilderness: Or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature.” Environmental History 1 (1): 7–28. doi:10.2307/3985059.
  • Dake, K. 1992. “Myths of Nature: Cultural and Social Construction of Risk.” Journal of Social Issues 48 (4): 21–37. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01943.x.
  • Donaldson, R., S. Ferreira, S. Didier, E. Rodary, and J. Swanepoel. 2016. “Access to the Urban National Park in Cape Town: Where Urban and Natural Environment Meet.” Habitat International 57: 132–142. DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.04.010.
  • Douglas, M. 1986. Risk Acceptability according to the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Douglas, M. 1999. “Four Cultures: The Evolution of a Parsimonious Model.” GeoJournal 47 (3): 411–415. doi:10.1023/A:1007008025151.
  • Douglas, M., and A. Wildavsky. 1983. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/796148
  • Dryzek, J. 2005. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Edgar, A., and P. Sedgwick. 2008. Cultural Theory: The Key Concepts. 2nd ed. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
  • Fairclough, N. 1992. “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 3 (2): 193–217. doi:10.1177/0957926592003002004.
  • Fairclough, N. 1993. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Feindt, P., and A. Oels. 2005. “Does Discourse Matter? Discourse Analysis in Environmental Policy Making.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 7 (3): 161–173. doi:10.1080/15239080500339638.
  • Floyd, M. 2001. “Managing National Parks in a Multicultural Society: Searching Common Ground.” George Right Forum 18 (3): 4–51.
  • Flyvbjerg, B., and T. Richardson. 2002. “Planning and Foucault: In Search of the Dark Side of Planning Theory.” Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory 7 (2): 44–63. doi:10.1177/1473095208090432.
  • Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, Edited by C. Gordon. New York: Pantheon.
  • Foucault, M. 1994. Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth. The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984. New York: New Press.
  • Foucault, M. 2000. Power: Volume 3 of the Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Edited by J. Faubion. New York: New Press.
  • Graham, L. 2005. “Discourse Analysis and the Critical Use of Foucault.” Australia Association for Research in Education 11 (4): 1–15. doi:10.1177/0959354301114006.
  • Green, L. 2007. “Changing Nature: ‘Working Lives on Table Mountain, 1980–2000’.” In Imagining the City. Memories and Cultures in Cape Town, edited by S. Field, R. Meyer, and F. Swanson, 173–190. Pretoria: HSRC Press.
  • Hajer, M. 1997. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Discourse and the Policy Process. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019829333X.001.0001
  • Hajer, M., and W. Versteeg. 2005. “A Decade of Discourse Analysis of Environmental Politics: Achievements, Challenges, Perspectives.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 7 (3): 175–184. doi:10.1080/15239080500339646.
  • Hardy, C., and R. Thomas. 2014. “Strategy, Discourse and Practice: The Intensification of Power.” Journal of Management Studies 51 (2): 320–348. doi:10.1111/joms.12005.
  • Hardy, C., and S. Maguire. 2016. “Organizing Risk: Discourse, Power, and ‘Riskification’.” Academy of Management Review 41 (1). doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0106.
  • Haugaard, M. 2003. “Reflections on Seven Ways of Creating Power.” European Journal of Social Theory 6 (1): 87–113. doi:10.1177/1368431003006001562.
  • Howarth, D. 2000. Discourse. Oxford: Open University Press.
  • Jacobs, K. 1999. “Key Themes and Future Prospects: Conclusion to the Special Issue.” Urban Studies 36 (1): 203–213. doi:10.1080/0042098993826.
  • Janks, H. 2007. “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Research Tool.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 18 (3): 329–342. doi:10.1080/0159630970180302.
  • Jørgensen, M., and L. Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage Publications.
  • Joubert, L., and G. Ziervogel. 2019. “Day Zero: One City’s Response to a Record Breaking Drought.” Cape Town: African Climate and Development Initiative, and University of Cape Town. Accessed 1 March 2021. www.dayzero.org.za
  • Kidd, M. 2011. Environmental Law. 2nd ed. Cape Town: Juta.
  • Kidd, M., F. Retief, and R. Alberts. 2018. “Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management.” In Environmental Management in South Africa, edited by N. King, H. Strydom, and F. Retief, 1213–1277. 3rd ed. Cape Town: Juta.
  • King, P., and C. Reddell. 2015. “Public Participation and Water Use Rights.” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 18 (4): 934–967.
  • Knights, D., and G. Morgan. 1991. “Corporate Strategy, Organizations, and Subjectivity: A Critique.” Organization Studies 12 (2): 251–272. doi:10.1177/017084069101200205.
  • Kotze, L. 2004. “The Application of Just Administrative Action in the South African Environmental Governance Sphere: An Analysis of Some Contemporary Thoughts and Recent Jurisprudence.” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 7 (2): 58–94.
  • Low, A., and A. Rebelo, eds. 1996. Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Pretoria: DEAT.
  • Low, S., D. Taplin, and S. Scheld. 2005. Rethinking Urban Parks: Public Space and Cultural Diversity. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Mamadouh, V. 1999. “Grid-Group Cultural Theory: An Introduction.” GeoJournal 47 (3): 395–409. doi:10.1023/A:1007024008646.
  • Myerson, G., and Y. Rydin. 1996. The Language of the Environment: A New Rhetoric. London: UCL Press.
  • Offermans, A. 2010. “History of Cultural Theory: A Summary of Historical Developments regarding Cultural Theory.” Report no. U10058. Maastricht: International Centre for Integrated Assessment and Sustainable Development (ICIS).
  • Parkscape v MTO Forestry (Pty) Ltd. 2017. Accessed 1 March 2021. http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2017/22.html
  • Partidario, M., and W. Sheate. 2013. “Knowledge Brokerage - Potential for Increased Capacities and Shared Power in Impact Assessment.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 39: 26–36. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.02.002.
  • Raymond, C., I. Fazey, M. Reed, L. Stringer, G. M. Robinson, and A. C. Evely. 2010. “Integrating Local and Scientific Knowledge for Environmental Management.” Journal of Environmental Management 91 (8): 1766–1777. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023.
  • Rebelo, A. G., P. Holmes, C. Dorse, and J. Wood. 2011. “Impacts of Urbanization in a Biodiversity Hotspot: Conservation Challenges in Metropolitan Cape Town.” South African Journal of Botany 77 (1): 20–36. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2010.04.006.
  • Retief, F., T. Fischer, R. Alberts, C. Roos, and D. Cilliers. 2020. “An Administrative Justice Perspective on Improving EIA Effectiveness.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 38 (2): 151–155. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1680042.
  • Richardson, T. 2005. “Environmental Assessment and Planning Theory: Four Short Stories about Power, Multiple Rationality, and Ethics.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25 (4): 341–365. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.006.
  • Robins, S. 2014. “The 2011 Toilet Wars in South Africa: Justice and Transition between the Exceptional and the Everyday after Apartheid.” Development and Change 45 (3): 479–501. doi:10.1111/dech.12091.
  • Rouget, M., B. Reyers, Z. Jonas, P. Desmet, A. Driver, A. Maze, B. Egoh, and R. Cowling. 2004. “South African National Spatial Biodiversity Assessment 2004: Technical Report. Volume 1: Terrestrial Component.” SANBI: Pretoria.
  • Rouget, M., D. Richardson, R. Cowling, J. Wendy Lloyd, and A. Lombard. 2003. “Current Patterns of Habitat Transformation and Future Threats to Biodiversity in Terrestrial Ecosystems of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa.” Biological Conservation 112 (1): 63–85. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00395-6.
  • Rozema, J., and A. Bond. 2015. “Framing Effectiveness in Impact Assessment: Discourse Accommodation in Controversial Infrastructure Development.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 50 (January): 66–73. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.001.
  • Rozema, J., A. Bond, M. Cashmore, and J. Chilvers. 2012. “An Investigation of Environmental and Sustainability Discourses Associated with the Substantive Purposes of Environmental Assessment.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 33 (1): 80–90. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2011.11.003.
  • Runhaar, H. 2009. “Putting SEA in Context: A Discourse Perspective on How SEA Contributes to Decision-Making.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 29 (3): 200–209. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2008.09.003.
  • Runhaar, H., F. Van Laerhoven, P. Driessen, and J. Arts. 2013. “Environmental Assessment in the Netherlands: Effectively Governing Environmental Protection? A Discourse Analysis.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 39 (February): 13–25. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.05.003.
  • SANParks. 2015. “Table Mountain National Park – Park Management Plan: 2015-2025.” Accessed 8 March 2021. www.sanparks.org/assets/docs/conservation/park_man/tmnp_approved_plan.pdf
  • Sarewitz, D. 2004. “How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse.” Environmental Science & Policy 7 (5): 385–403. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001.
  • Sharp, L., and T. Richardson. 2001. “Reflections on Foucauldian Discourse Analysis in Planning and Environmental Policy Research.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 3: 193–209. doi:10.1002/jepp.88.
  • Stehle, T. 2014. “Cape Timber Supplies on a Short Fuse.” SA Forestry Online, July 11. Accessed 1 March 2021. http://saforestryonline.co.za/articles/sawmilling_and_processing/cape_timber_supplies_on_a_short_fuse/
  • Stirling, A. 2010. “Keep It Complex.” Nature 468: 1029–1031. doi:10.1038/4681029a.
  • Strydom, P. 2002. Risk, Environment and Society: Ongoing Debates, Current Issues and Future Prospects. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  • Thomas, K. 1983. Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800. UK: Penguin Books.
  • Thompson, M., R. Ellis, and A. Wildavsky. 1990. Cultural Theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Underwood, E., J. Viers, K. Klausmeyer, R. Cox, and M. Shaw. 2009. “Threats and Biodiversity in the Mediterranean Biome.” Diversity & Distributions 15 (2): 188–197.
  • Van Sittert, L. 2003. “Making the Cape Floral Kingdom: The Discovery and Defence of Indigenous Flora at the Cape Ca. 1890–1939.” Landscape Research 28 (1): 113–129. doi:10.1080/01426390306529.
  • Wiklund, H. 2005. “In Search of Arenas for Democratic Deliberation: A Habermasian Review of Environmental Assessment.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 23 (4): 281–292. doi:10.3152/147154605781765391.
  • Wolski, P. 2018. “How Severe Is Cape Town’s ‘Day Zero’ Drought?” Significance 15 (2): 24–27. doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2018.01127.x.
  • Wynne, B. 2002. “Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity inside Out.” Current Sociology 50 (3): 459–477.
  • Yeld, J. 2017. “Critically Endangered: A Tale of Fynbos and Pines, Parks and People.” Veld and Flora: Journal of the Botanical Society of South Africa 103 (3): 131–146.
  • Ziervogel, G., M. Pelling, A. Cartwright, E. Chu, T. Deshpande, L. Harris, and K. Hyams. 2017. “Inserting Rights and Justice into Urban Resilience: A Focus on Everyday Risk.” Environment and Urbanization 29 (1): 123–138. doi:10.1177/0956247816686905.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.