Advanced search
Publication Cover
Monumenta Serica
Journal of Oriental Studies
Volume 70, 2022 - Issue 2
Journal homepage
200
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Han Feizi and the Earliest Exegesis of Zuozhuan

最早的《左傳》詮釋——再論《韓非子・難四》篇

Yuri PinesCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 341-365 | Published online: 01 Dec 2022

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Chunqiu Zuozhuan zhu 春秋左傳注. Annotated by Yang Bojun 楊伯峻 (1909–1992). Rev. ed. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1990. Cited as Zuozhuan.
  • Durrant, Stephen W. – Li Wai-yee – David Schaberg (trans.). 2016. Zuo Tradition / Zuozhuan Commentary on the “Spring and Autumn Annals.” Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Han Feizi jiaoshu 韓非子校疏. Zhang Jue 張覺. Shanghai: Shanghai guji, 2010. Cited as Han Feizi.
  • Han Feizi xin jiaozhu 韓非子新校注. Edited and annotated by Chen Qiyou 陳奇猷. Shanghai: Guji chubanshe, 2000.
  • Lüshi chunqiu jiaoshi 呂氏春秋校釋. 1995. Compiled and annotated by Chen Qiyou 陳奇猷 (1917–2006). Shanghai: Xuelin.
  • Mengzi yizhu 孟子譯注. 1992. Annotated by Yang Bojun 楊伯峻 (1909–1992). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
  • Zhuzi yulei 朱子語類. 1986. By Zhu Xi 朱熹 (1130–1200). Compiled by Li Jingde 黎靖德 (13th c.), collated by Wang Xingxian 王星賢. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.

Secondary Sources

  • Allan, Sarah. 2016. The Heir and the Sage: Dynastic Legend in Early China. Rev. ed. Albany: SUNY Press.
  • Creel, Herrlee G. 1970. The Origins of Statecraft in China, Volume One: The Western Chou Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gentz, Joachim. 2017. “One Heaven, One History, One People: Repositioning the Zhou in Royal Addresses to Subdued Enemies in the ‘Duo shi’ 多士 and ‘Duo fang’ 多方 Chapters of the Shangshu and in the ‘Shang shi’ 商誓 Chapter of the Yi Zhoushu.” In: Origins of Chinese Political Philosophy: Studies in the Composition and Thought of the Shangshu (Classic of Documents). Ed. Martin Kern and Dirk Meyer. Leiden et al.: Brill, pp. 146–192.
  • Goldin, Paul R. 2005. After Confucius: Studies in Early Chinese Philosophy. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
  • Goldin, Paul R. 2008. “Appeals to History in Early Chinese Philosophy and Rhetoric.” JCP 35 (2008) 1: 79–96.
  • Goldin, Paul R. 2011. “Persistent Misconceptions about Chinese ‘Legalism.’” JCP 38 (2011) 1: 64–80.
  • Goldin, Paul R. (ed.). 2013a. Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Goldin, Paul R. 2013b. “Han Fei and the Han Feizi.” In: Goldin 2013a, pp. 1–21.
  • Goldin, Paul R. 2017. “Copulating with One’s Stepmother – Or Birth Mother?” In: Behaving Badly in Early and Medieval China. Ed. N. Harry Rothschild and Leslie V. Wallace. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, pp. 56–69.
  • Goldin, Paul R. 2020. The Art of Chinese Philosophy: Eight Classical Texts and How to Read Them. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Graziani, Romain. 2015. “Monarch and Minister: The Problematic Partnership in the Building of Absolute Monarchy in the Han Feizi 韓非子.” In: Ideology of Power and Power of Ideology in Early China. Ed. Yuri Pines, Paul R. Goldin, and Martin Kern. Leiden et al.: Brill, pp. 155–180.
  • Harbsmeier, Christoph. (trans.). Forthcoming. Han Feizi. Ed. Jens Ø. Petersen and Yuri Pines. Leiden et al.: Brill.
  • Henry, Eric. 1999. “‘Junzi yue’ and ‘Zhongni yue’ in Zuozhuan.” HJAS 59 (1999) 1: 125–161.
  • Kern, Martin. 2003. “Western Han Aesthetics and the Genesis of the fu.” HJAS 63 (2003) 2: 383–437.
  • Kern, Martin. Forthcoming. “Poetry, Quotation, Commentary, and the Ritual Order: Staging the Noble Man in Zuozhuan.” In: Early Chinese Historiography: Zuozhuan in Comparative Perspective. Ed. Yuri Pines, Martin Kern, and Nino Luraghi. Leiden et al.: Brill.
  • Lewis, Mark E. 1999. Writing and Authority in Early China. Albany: SUNY Press.
  • Lewis, Mark E.. 2020. Honor and Shame in Early China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Li Wai-yee. 2007. The Readability of the Past in Early Chinese Historiography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center.
  • Li Wai-yee. Forthcoming. “Inconvenient and Unnecessary Details in Zuozhuan.” In: Early Chinese Historiography: Zuozhuan in Comparative Perspective. Ed. Yuri Pines, Martin Kern, and Nino Luraghi. Leiden et al.: Brill.
  • Liu Fenglu 劉逢祿 (1776–1829). 1955. “Zuoshi chunqiu kaozheng” 左氏春秋考證. Rpt. in: Guji kaobian congkan 古籍考辨叢刊. Ed. Gu Jiegang 顧頡剛. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, pp. 561–604.
  • Liu Zhenghao 劉正浩. 1980. Zhou Qin zhuzi shu Zuozhuan kao 周秦諸子述左傳考. Taipei: Taiwan shangwu.
  • Lundahl, Bertil. 1992. Han Fei Zi: The Man and the Work. Stockholm: Institute of Oriental Languages, Stockholm University.
  • Petersen, Jens Østergård. 1995. “Which Books Did the First Emperor of Ch’in Burn? On the Meaning of Pai Chia in Early Chinese Sources.” Monumenta Serica 43 (1995): 1–52.
  • Pi Xirui 皮錫瑞 (1850–1908). 1998 [1907]. Jingxue tonglun 經學通論. Rpt. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
  • Pines, Yuri. 2002. Foundations of Confucian Thought: Intellectual Life in the Chunqiu Period, 722–453 B.C.E. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
  • Pines, Yuri. 2005a. “Disputers of Abdication: Zhanguo Egalitarianism and the Sovereign’s Power.” TP 91 (2005) 4–5: 243–300.
  • Pines, Yuri. 2005b. “Speeches and the Question of Authenticity in Ancient Chinese Historical Records.” In: Historical Truth, Historical Criticism and Ideology: Chinese Historiography and Historical Culture from a New Comparative Perspective. Ed. Helwig Schmidt-Glintzer, Achim Mittag, and Jörn Rüsen. Leiden et al.: Brill, pp. 195–224.
  • Pines, Yuri. 2009. Envisioning Eternal Empire: Chinese Political Thought of the Warring States Era. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
  • Pines, Yuri. 2013. “Submerged by Absolute Power: The Ruler’s Predicament in the Han Feizi.” In: Goldin 2013a, pp. 67–86.
  • Pines, Yuri. 2014. “Legalism in Chinese Philosophy.” In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Edward N. Zalta et al. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-legalism/ (accessed 21 June 2022).
  • Pines, Yuri. (trans. and ed.). 2017. The Book of Lord Shang: Apologetics of State Power in Early China. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Pines, Yuri. 2020a. Zhou History Unearthed: The Bamboo Manuscript Xinian and Early Chinese Historiography. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Pines, Yuri. 2020b. “Worth vs. Power: Han Fei’s ‘Objection to Positional Power’ Revisited.” AS/EA 74 (2020) 3, pp. 687–710 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/asia-2019–0040).
  • Polnarov, Anatoly. 2018. “Looking Beyond Dichotomies: Hidden Diversity of Voices in the Yantielun 鹽鐵論.” TP 104 (2018): 465–495.
  • Qiao Zhizhong 乔治忠. 2016. “Zuozhuan, Guoyu bei Liu Xin cuanluan de yixiang tiezheng: Lishi niandaixue Liu Tan zhi shuo shenlun” 《左传》《国语》被刘歆窜乱的一项铁证——历史年代学刘坦之说申论. Beijing shifan daxue xuebao (Shehuikexue ban) 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版) 2016/3: 68–78.
  • Queen, Sarah. 2013. “Han Feizi and the Old Master: A Comparative Analysis and Translation of Han Feizi Chapter 20, ‘Jie Lao,’ and Chapter 21, ‘Yu Lao.’” In: Goldin 2013a, pp. 147–165.
  • Sato Masayuki. 2013. “Did Xunzi’s Theory of Human Nature Provide the Foundation for the Political Thought of Han Fei?” In: Goldin 2013a, pp. 147–165.
  • Schaberg, David. 2001. A Patterned Past: Form and Thought in Early Chinese Historiography. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Asia Center.
  • Schaberg, David. 2011. “Chinese History and Philosophy.” In: The Oxford History of Historical Writing, Volume 1: Beginnings to AD 600. Ed. Andrew Feldherr and Grant Hardy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 394–414.
  • Van Auken, Newell Ann. 2016. “Judgments of the Gentleman: A New Analysis of the Place of junzi Comments in Zuozhuan Composition History.” Monumenta Serica 64 (2016) 2: 277–302.
  • Vogelsang, Kai. 2007. Geschichte als Problem: Entstehung, Formen und Funktionen von Ge­schichtsschreibung im Alten China. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  • Vogelsang, Kai. Forthcoming. “The Historiography of Political Realism.” In: Dao Companion to China’s fa Tradition: The Philosophy of Governance by Impartial Standards. Ed. Yuri Pines. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Wang He 王和. 1984. “Lun Zuozhuan yuyan” 论左传预言. Shixue yuekan 史学月刊 6 (1984): 13–18.
  • Wang Hsiao-po – Leo S. Chang. 1986. The Philosophical Foundations of Han Fei’s Political Theory. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
  • Xu Jianwei 徐建委. 2017. Wenben geming: Liu Xiang, “Hanshu yiwenzhi” yu zaoqi wenben yanjiu 文本革命——刘向、《汉书・艺文志》与早期文本研究. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.
  • Zhang Suzhen 張素貞. 1987. Han Feizi nan pian yanjiu: Han Feizi de bianlunshu 韓非子難篇研究——韓非子的辯論術. Taipei: Xuesheng shuju.
  • Zheng Liangshu 鄭良樹. 1993. Han Fei zhi zhushu ji sixiang 韓非之著書及思想. Taipei: Xuesheng shuju.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.