Democratising Goals in a Neoliberal Context—The Multiple Temporalities in Finnish Cultural Policy Discourses

References

• Belfiore, Eleonora. 2002. “Art as a Means of Alleviating Social Exclusion: Does It Really Work? A Critique of Instrumental Cultural Policies and Social Impact Studies in the UK.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 8 (1): 91–106. doi:10.1080/102866302900324658.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, Eleonora. 2004. “Auditing Culture. The Subsidised Cultural Sector in the New Public Management.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 10 (2): 183–202. doi:10.1080/10286630042000255808.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, Eleonora. 2012. “’Defensive Instrumentalism’ and the Legacy of New Labour's Cultural Policies.” Cultural Trends 21 (2): 103–111. doi:10.1080/09548963.2012.674750.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, Claire. 2012. Artificial Hells. Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, John. 2010. “Of Crises and Conjunctures: The Problem of the Present.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 34 (4): 337–354. doi:10.1177/0196859910382451.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, John. 2019. “A Sense of Loss? Unsettled Attachments in the Current Conjuncture.” New Formations 96/97: 132–146. doi:10.3898/NEWF:96/97.05.2019.
   Google Scholar
• Dewinter, Hanne, Kris Rutten, and Lieve Bradt. 2020. “Policy Attachment in the Arts: The Underlying Agendas of Arts’ Social Role.” Cultural Trends 29 (2): 96–111. doi:10.1080/09548963.2020.1763780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duelund, Peter. 2008. “Nordic Cultural Policies: A Critical View.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 14 (1): 7–24. doi:10.1080/10286630701856468.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman, Jane Mulderrig, and Ruth Wodak. 2011. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 394–417. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Clive. 2002. “Local Government and the Arts.” Local Government Studies 28 (1): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/714004133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, Clive. 2007. “Commodification and Instrumentality in Cultural Policy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 13 (2): 203–215. doi:10.1080/10286630701342899.
   Google Scholar
• Grossberg, Lawrence. 2006. “Does Cultural Studies Have Futures? Should It? (Or What’s the Matter with New York?).” Cultural Studies 20 (1): 1–32. doi:10.1080/09502380500492541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossberg, Lawrence. 2010. Cultural Studies in the Future Tense. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Stuart. 1985. “Signification, Representation, Ideology: Althusser and the Post-Structuralist Debates.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 2 (2): 91–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Stuart, and Doreen Massey. 2012. “Interpreting the Crisis.” In The Neoliberal Crisis, edited by Jonathan Rutherford, and Sally Davison, 55–69. London: Lawrence Wishart. Accessed December 22, 2019. https://indefenceofyouthwork.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/the_neoliberal_crisis.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Stuart, Doreen Massey, and Michael Rustin. 2013. “After Neoliberalism: Analysing the Present.” Soundings (53): 8–22. doi:10.3898/136266213806045656.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskala, Risto and Eeva Luhtakallio, eds. 2006. Uusi Jako. Miten Suomesta Tuli Kilpailukyky-Yhteiskunta? [The New Deal. How Did Finland Become a Competitiveness Society?]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, Bob. 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, Anita, and Esa Pirnes. 2015. “Kulttuuripoliittinen Päätöksenteko, Lainsäädäntö, Hallinto ja Rahoitus.” [Decision-making, Legislation, Administration and Financing in Cultural Policy.] In Taiteen ja Kulttuurin Kentät. Perusrakenteet, Hallinta ja Lainsäädäntö [Fields of Art and Culture. Basic Structures, Management and Legislation], edited by Ilkka Heiskanen, Anita Kangas and Ritva Mitchell, 23–108. Helsinki: Tietosanoma.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, Donald F. 2000. The Global Public Management Revolution. A Report on the Transformation of Governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kharkina, Anna. 2013. “From Kinship to Global Brand. The Discourse on Culture in Nordic Cooperation after World War II.” PhD diss., Stockholm University. Accessed December 22, 2019. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:639460/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mangset, Per. 2009. “The Arm’s Length Principle and the Art Funding System: A Comparative Approach.” In What About Cultural Policy? Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Culture and Politics, edited by Miikka Pyykkönen, Niina Simanainen, and Sakarias Sokka, 273–297. Helsinki: Minerva. Accessed December 22, 2019. https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/41953/978-952-492-320-0.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• McGuigan, Jim. 2005. “Neo-liberalism, Culture and Policy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 11 (3): 229–241. doi:10.1080/10286630500411168.
   Google Scholar
• Rutten, Kris. 2018. “Participation, Art and Digital Culture.” Critical Arts 32 (3): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, Kris, Helena Calleeuw, Griet Roets, and Angelo Van Gorp. 2019. “Cultural Policy and Participatory Art Practices in Flanders.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 32 (2): 266–281. doi:10.1108/JOCM-08-2018-0209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarinen, Arttu, Suvi Salmenniemi, and Harri Keränen. 2014. “Hyvinvointivaltiosta Hyvinvoivaan Valtioon. Hyvinvointi ja Kansalaisuus Suomalaisessa Poliittisessa Diskurssissa.” [“From Welfare State to Welfare of the State. Welfare and Citizenship in Finnish Political Discourse.”] Yhteiskuntapolitiikka 79 (6): 605–618. Accessed December 23, 2019. http://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/125354.
   Google Scholar
• Sokka, Sakarias, and Anita Kangas. 2007. “At the Roots of Finnish Cultural Policy. Intellectuals, Nationalism, and the Arts.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 13 (2): 185–202. doi:10.1080/10286630701342865.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, David, Gitte Balling, and Nanna Kann-Rasmussen. 2017. “Cultural Participation in Europe: Shared Problem or Shared Problematisation?” International Journal of Cultural Policy 23 (1): 89–106. doi:10.1080/10286632.2015.1043290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, Anne Scott. 2014. “Danish cultural policies and communication 1961-1914.” Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Cultural Policy Research, Hildesheim, Germany, September 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, Anne Scott. 2016. “‘Participation’. The New Cultural Policy and Communication Agenda.” Nordisk Kulturpolitisk Tidsskrift 19 (1): 4–18. Accessed December 22, 2019. https://www.idunn.no/nkt/2016/01/participation_-_the_new_cultural_policy_and_communication.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, Teun A. 1995. “Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Japanese Discourse 1 (1): 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Vestheim, Geir. 2007. “Theoretical Reflections.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 13 (2): 217–236. doi:10.1080/10286630701342907.
   Google Scholar
• Virolainen, Jutta. 2016. “Participatory Turn in Cultural Policy? An Analysis of the Concept of Cultural Participation in Finnish Cultural Policy.” Nordisk Kulturpolitisk Tidsskrift 19 (1): 59–77. Accessed December 22, 2019. https://www.idunn.no/nkt/2016/01/participatory_turn_in_culturalpolicy_-_an_analysis_of_the.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “What CDA is About—A Summary of its History, Important Concepts, and Its Developments.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–13. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar