Construing Community with a Shared Future in President Xi Jinping’s Diplomatic Discourse (2013–2018): The Role of Personal Pronouns we and they

References

• Abid, R. Z., and S. A. Manan. 2016. “Constructing the “Self” and the “Other” in Bush’s Political Discourse Before and After the Iraq War (2002–2008).” Journal of Language and Politics 15 (6): 710–726. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.6.03abi.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achugar, M. 2004. “The Events and Actors of 11 September 2001 as Seen from Uruguay: Analysis of Daily Newspaper Editorials.” Discourse and Society 15 (2–3): 291–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., N. Ahmad, and J. A. Tsang. 2002. “Four Motives for Community Involvement.” Journal of Social Issues 58 (3): 429–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R., and A. Gilman. 1960. “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in Language, edited by T. Sebeok, 253–276. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada Pérez, M. 2001. “A Three-Level Methodology for Descriptive-Explanatory Translation Studies.” Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 13 (2): 203–239.
   Google Scholar
• Carta, C. 2015. “The Swinging “We”: Framing the European Union International Discourse.” Journal of Language and Politics 14 (1): 65–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.04car.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIPG/China academy of translation and interpreting. 2016. Key Words to Understand China. Beijing: New World Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Matt. 2013. Oppositions and Ideology in News Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• de Cillia, R., M. Reisigl, and R. Wodak. 1999. “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse & Society 10 (2): 149–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Z. A. 2017. “Constructing New Type of International Relation and Building Community with a Shared Future for Mankind.” Administration Reform 11: 97–100.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J. 1997. “The Discourse of Colonial Withdrawal: A Case Study in the Creation of Mythic Discourse.” Discourse & Society 8 (4): 453–477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008004002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, R. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gardelle, L., and S. Sorlin. 2015. “Personal Pronouns: An Exposition.” In The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns, edited by Laure Gardelle and Sandrine Sorlin, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (revised by Christian Matthiessen). 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. New York: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. Essex: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, R. I. V., and G. R. Kress. 1993. Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. 2018. “Progressing Positive Discourse Analysis and/in Critical Discourse Studies: Reconstructing Resistance Through Progressive Discourse Analysis.” Review of Communication 18 (3): 193–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2018.1479880.
   Google Scholar
• Íñigo-Mora, I. 2004. “On the Use of the Personal Pronoun ‘We’ in Communities.” Journal of Language and Politics 3 (1): 27–52.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. M. 1994. “Who is We?: Constructing Communities in US-Mexico Border Discourse.” Discourse & Society 5 (2): 207–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, R. T. 1990. Talking Power: The Politics of Language in Our Lives. Glasgow: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, R. 1995. “Argument and Community.” Communication and Cognition 28 (4): 367–386.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 2004. “Positive Discourse Analysis: Solidarity and Change.” Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 49: 179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, A. 2003. Community, Solidarity and Belonging: Levels of Community and Their Normative Significance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, C. 1995. Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 1989. “In What Sense Must Socialism Be Communitarian?” Social Philosophy and Policy 6: 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. 1994. “The Politics of Pronouns.” ELT Journal 48 (2): 173–178.
   Google Scholar
• Petersoo, P. 2007. “What Does ‘We’ Mean? National Deixis in the Media.” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (3): 419–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, A. 1983. “Pronouns of Person and Power: A Study of Personal Pronouns in Public Discourse.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis., The University of Sheffield, Department of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Romagnuolo, A. 2009. “Political Discourse in Translation: A Corpus-Based Perspective on Presidential Inaugurals.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 4 (1): 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundle, C., and K. Sturge, eds. 2010. Translation Under Fascism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schãffner, C. 2004. “Political Discourse Analysis from the Point of View of Translation Studies.” Journal of Language and Politics 3 (1): 117–150.
   Google Scholar
• Schãffner, C., and S. Bassnett. 2010. Political Discourse, Media and Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• SCIO (The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China). 2019. China’s National Defense in the New Era. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-07/24/c_138253389.htm.
   Google Scholar
• SCIO (The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China). 2011. China's Peaceful Development (White Paper). Beijing: People's Publishing House. http://www.scio.gov.cn/zxbd/nd/2011/Document/999798/999798.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Sonwalker, P. 2005. “Banal Journalism: The Centrality of the ‘Us-Them’ Binary in News Discourse.” In Journalism: Critical Issues, 261–273, edited by Stuart Allan. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. 1991. Racism in the Press: Critical Studies in Racism and Migration. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wales, K. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. 1990. Politically Speaking. Oxford: Blackwells.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. 1997. “Das Ausland and Anti-Semitic Discourse: The Discursive Construction of the Other.” In The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse, 65–87, edited by Willibald Steinmetz. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Xi, J. 2019. Building a Human Community with a Shared Future. Beijing: Central Compilation & Translation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, F., and J. Su. 2018. “Shaping ‘A Community of Shared Future for Mankind’: New Elements of General Assembly Resolution 72/250 on Further Practical Measures for the PAROS.” Space Policy 44-45: 57–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, M. L. 2017. “命运共同体思想的四个层次.” [The Four Levels of the Idea of Community with a Shared Future].” 学习时报 [Study Times]. January 18. http://theory.people.com.cn/GB/n1/2017/0118/c40531-29033012.html.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H., and C. Wu. 2017. “Recreating the Image of Chan Master Huineng: The Role of Personal Pronouns.” Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 29 (1): 64–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/target.29.1.03yu.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H., and C. Wu. 2018. “Images of the Chinese Government Projected in Its Work Reports: Transformation Through Translation.” Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale 214: 74–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunespour, A. R. 2011. “Identity Politics: A Case Study of Afghanistan.” MA Thesis., University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar