Museum without Objects: A Phenomenological Study of the Cinema Museum

References

• Balsom, E. 2013. “Original Copies: How Film and Video Became Art Objects.” Cinema Journal 53 (1): 97–118. doi:10.1353/cj.2013.0054.
   Google Scholar
• Bandy, M. L. 1994. “The Movies at MOMA: The First Cinema Museum in the United States.” Museum International 46 (4): 26–31. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0033.1994.tb01203.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottomore, S. 1995. “‘The Collection of Rubbish.’ Animatographs, Archives and Arguments: London, 1896–97.” Film History 7 (3): 291–297.
   Google Scholar
• Bottomore, S. 2006. “Film Museums: A Bibliography.” Film History: An International Journal 18 (3): 327–349. doi:10.2979/FIL.2006.18.3.327.
   Google Scholar
• Chamarette, J. 2012. Phenomenology and the Future of Film: Rethinking Subjectivity Beyond French Cinema. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, I. 2012. “A Disturbing Presence? Scenes from the History of Film in the Museum.” In Film, Art, New Media: Museum without Walls?, edited by A. D. Vacche, 241–255. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Classen, C. 2007. “Museum Manners: The Sensory Life of the Early Museum.” Journal of Social History 40 (4): 895–914. doi:10.1353/jsh.2007.0089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classen, C., and D. Howes. 2006. “The Museum as Sensescape: Western Sensibilities and Indigenous Artefacts.” In Sensible Objects: Colonialism, Museums and Material Culture, edited by E. Edwards, C. Gosden, and R. Phillips, 199–222. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, M. 2013. “Shared Viesing: Moving Images in the Cinema and Museum.” Millennium Film Journal 58: 18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Crew, S. R., and J. E. Sims. 1991. “Locating Authenticity: Fragments of a Dialogue.” In Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display, edited by I. Karp, and S. Lavine, 159–175. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, S. H. 2012. Museum Objects: Experiencing the Properties of Things. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, S. 2014. “What's in the Drawer?” The Senses and Society 9 (3): 296–309. doi:10.2752/174589314X14023847039791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, C. 1995. Civilizing Rituals: Inside Public Art Museums. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., and L. D. Dierking. 1992. The Museum Experience. Washington, DC: Whalesback Books.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., and L. D. Dierking. 2000. Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., and L. D. Dierking. 2013. The Museum Experience Revisited. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Godard, J. L., and Y. Ishaghpour. 2005. Cinema: The Archaeology of Film and the Memory of a Century. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A. 2008. Shivers Down Your Spine: Cinema, Museums, and the Immersive View. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlyn, N. 2012. “What's Wrong with Cinema in the Gallery?” The Moving Image Review & Art Journal (MIRAJ) 1 (2): 265–269. doi:10.1386/miraj.1.2.265_4.
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, U., O. Landesman, B. Knappmeyer, I. Vallines, N. Rubin, and D. Heeger. 2008. “Neurocinematics: The Neuroscience of Film.” Projections 2 (1): 1–26. doi:10.3167/proj.2008.020102.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1950) 2002. Off the Beaten Track. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1971) 1975. “The Origin of the Work of Art.” In Poetry, Language, Thought, edited by A. Hofstadter, 15–56. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, G. E. 1998. Learning in the Museum. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D. 2014. “Introduction to Sensory Museology.” The Senses and Society 9 (3): 259–267. doi:10.2752/174589314X14023847039917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, D., and C. Classen. 2013. Ways of Sensing: Understanding the Senses in Society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• International Council of Museums. 2022. ICOM Approves a New Museum Definition, August 24. https://icom.museum/en/news/icom-approves-a-new-museum-definition/.
   Google Scholar
• Latsis, D. 2016. “The Beginnings of Cinema as a Museum Exhibit: The Cases of the Smithsonian Institution and the Science Museum in London.” The Moving Image: The Journal of the Association of Moving Image Archivists 16 (1): 17–34. doi:10.5749/movingimage.16.1.0017.
   Google Scholar
• Malraux, A. 1949. Museum without Walls: The Psychology of Art I. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelli, E. 2019. The Museum as a Cinematic Space: The Display of Moving Images in Exhibitions. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univerisity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matuszewski, B., L. U. Marks, and D. Koszarski. 1995. “A New Source of History.” Film History 7 (3): 322–324.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, L. 2012. Cinema and Contact: The Withdrawal of Touch in Nancy, Bresson, Duras and Denis. New York, NY: Legenda.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945) 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1948) 1964. Sense and Non-Sense. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1969) 1973. The Prose of the World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 2007. “Indirect Language and the Voices of Silence.” In The Merleau-Ponty Reader, edited by T. Toadvine, and L. Lawlor, 241–282. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Museum International. 1994. “Cinema Museums and Archives.” Museum International 46 (4): 4–4. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0033.1994.tb01196.x.
   Google Scholar
• Niver, K. R. 1985. Early Motion Pictures: The Paper Print Collection in the Library of Congress. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, F. 1972. “The Exploratorium: A Playful Museum Combines Perception and Art in Science Education.” American Journal of Physics 40 (7): 978–984. doi:10.1119/1.1986726.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, J., and R. Ballantyne. 2002. “Motivational Factors and the Visitor Experience: A Comparison of Three Sites.” Curator: The Museum Journal 45 (3): 183–198. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2002.tb00055.x.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, J., and R. Ballantyne. 2016. “Conceptualizing the Visitor Experience: A Review of Literature and Development of a Multifaceted Model.” Visitor Studies 19 (2): 128–143. doi:10.1080/10645578.2016.1144023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, M. 2012. “Still Separate … But Equal?” The Moving Image: The Journal of the Association of Moving Image Archivists 12 (1): 89–91. doi:10.1353/mov.2012.0036.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarik, A. J., Z. D. Doering, and D. A. Karns. 1999. “Exploring Satisfying Experiences in Museums.” Curator: The Museum Journal 42 (2): 152–173. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.1999.tb01137.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarik, A. J., J. B. Schreiber, N. Hanemann, K. Richmond, and B. Mogel. 2014. “IPOP: A Theory of Experience Preference.” Curator: The Museum Journal 57 (1): 5–27. doi:10.1111/cura.12048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penz, F. 2012. “Museums as Laboratories of Change: The Case for the Moving Image.” In Film, Art, New Media: Museum without Walls?, edited by A. D. Vacche, 278–300. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pine, B. J., and J. H. Gilmore. 2011. The Experience Economy. Updated ed. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rascaroli, L. 2014. The Personal Camera: Subjective Cinema and the Essay Film. London: Wallflower Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravelli, L. 2006. Museum Texts: Comunication Frameworks. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rentzhog, S. 2007. Open Air Museums: The History and Future of a Visionary Idea. Ostersund: Jamtli Folag and Carlsson Bokfolag.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K. 2007. “Regional Moving Image Archives in the United States.” Cinema Journal 46 (3): 118–123. doi:10.1353/cj.2007.0030.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. S. 1989. “Museums, Artefacts, and Meanings.” In The New Museology, edited by P. Vergo, 46–50. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Soares, B. B. 2016. “Provoking Museology: The Geminal Thinking of Zbyněk Z. Stránský.” Museologica Brunensia 5 (2): 5–17. doi:10.5817/MuB2016-2-1.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, B. (2001) 2011. Technics and Time, 3: Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stránský, Z. Z. 1970. “Múzejnictvo v Relácii Teórie a Praxe.” Múzeum 15 (3): 173–183.
   Google Scholar
• Stránský, Z. Z. 1971. “Der Begriff der Museologie.” Muzeologické Sešity 1: 14–39.
   Google Scholar
• Stránský, Z. Z. 1980. “Museology as a Science.” Museologia 11 (15): 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Vacche, A. D. 2012. Film, Art, New Media: Museum without Walls? London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• van Mensch, P. 2016. “Metamuseological Challenges in the Work of Zbyněk Stránský.” Museologica Brunensia 5 (2): 18–26. doi:10.5817/MuB2016-2-2.
   Google Scholar
• Wasson, H. 2005. Museum Movies: The Museum of Modern Art and the Birth of Art Cinema. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, S. 2011. “Lost Objects: The Museum of Cinema.” In The Renewal of Cultural Studies, edited by P. Smith, 93–102. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zoller, M. 2008. “Places of Projection: Re-Contextualising the European Experimental Film Canon.” Unpublished PhD diss., University of London.
   Google Scholar