Gender Influences on Parent-Child Science Problem-Solving Behaviors

References

• Adamson, L. B., Foster, M. A., Roark, M. L., & Reed, D. B. (1998). Doing a science project: Gender differences during childhood. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 845–857. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1997). Gender differences in small group discussion in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 393–406. doi:10.1080/0950069970190403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A., & Chambers, S. (1999). Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 719–747. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2008). Girls’ biology, boys’ physics: Evidence from free-choice science learning settings. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26, 75–92.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing source. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brickhouse, N., & Potter, J. (2001). Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965–980. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britner, S., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485–499. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, & K. Luscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context (pp. 619–647). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (2004). Making human beings human. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Byler, P. L. (2000). Middle school girls’ attitudes towards math and science: Does the setting make a difference? ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M., Jessup, D. L., & Fuller, D. (1999). Gender differences in first-grade mathematics strategy use: Parent and teacher contributions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 20–46. doi:10.2307/749628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clewell, B. C., & Campbell, R. B. (2002). Taking stock: Where we’ve been, where we are, where we’re going. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8, 255–284. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v8.i3-4.20
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Duszynska, A. (1978). Reasoning level test. Applications of Piaget’s theoretical model to the construction of a science test for elementary school. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, National Institute of Education. (ERIC document reproduction service #ED 144988).
   Google Scholar
• Farenga, S. J., & Joyce, B. A. (1999). Intentions of young students to enroll in science courses in the future: An examination of gender differences. Science Education, 83, 56–72. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<55::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. W. (1998). A longitudinal study of gender differences in young children’s mathematical thinking. Educational Researcher, 27, 6–11. doi:10.3102/0013189X027005006
   Google Scholar
• Ford, D., Brickhouse, N. W., Lottero-Perdue, P., & Kittleson, J. (2006). Elementary girls’ science reading at home and school. Science Education, 90, 270–288. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, M. E., & Schauble, L. (2000). Parents’ assistance of their children’s scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 343–378. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00399.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halim, M. L., Ruble, D. N., & Amodio, D. M. (2011). From pink frilly dresses to “one of the boys”: A social-cognitive analysis of gender identity development and gender bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(11), 933–949. doi:10.1111/spco.2011.5.issue-11
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., Howe, A., & Rua, M. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84, 180–192. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<>1.0.CO;2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children’s sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 82–173). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O’Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2013). Practical research: Planning and design (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. (2004). Children’s search for gender cues: Cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 67–70. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. F., & Iglesias, A. (2008). Systematic analysis of language transcripts (SALT), Bilingual SE Version 2008 [Computer software]. SALT Software, LLC, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Trends in international mathematics and science study, assessment questions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/TIMSS/educators.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011 (Special Report NSF 11-309). Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, H., Mantzicopoulus, P., & Samarapungavan, A. (2009). Motivation for learning science in kindergarten: Is there a gender gap and does integrated inquiry and literacy instruction make a difference? Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 46, 166–191. doi:10.1002/tea.20276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radziszewska, B., & Rogoff, B. (1988). Influence of adult and peer collaborators on the development of children’s planning skills. Developmental Psychology, 24, 840–848. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radziszewska, B., & Rogoff, B. (1991). Children’s guided participation in planning imaginary errands with skilled adult or peer partners. Developmental Psychology, 27, 381–389. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.3.381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, H., & Leaper, C. (2003). Parent-child conversations about science: The socialization of gender inequities? Developmental Psychology, 39, 34–47. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, H. R. (2009). You’d be good at that: Gender patterns in child-parent talk about courses. Social Development, 18(2), 447–463. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00487.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautner, H. M., Ruble, D. N., Cyphers, L., Kirsten, B., Behrendt, R., & Hartmann, P. (2005). Rigidity and flexibility of gender stereotypes in childhood: Developmental or differential? Infant & Child Development, 14(4), 365–381. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1522-7219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowbridge, L., & Bybee, R. (1994). Biological science curriculum study. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar